Labor market reforms and allocative efficiency in Italy

被引:9
作者
Gnocato, Nicola [1 ]
Modena, Francesca [2 ]
Tomasi, Chiara [3 ]
机构
[1] Bocconi Univ, Milan, Italy
[2] Bank Italy, Trento Branch, Econ Res Unit, Trento, Italy
[3] Univ Trento, Dept Econ & Management, Via Inama 5, I-38122 Trento, Italy
关键词
Allocative efficiency; Resource allocation; Labor market reforms; Italy; CROSS-COUNTRY DIFFERENCES; TOTAL FACTOR PRODUCTIVITY; EMPLOYMENT; MISALLOCATION; DYNAMICS; IMPACT; POLICY; WAGES; TFP;
D O I
10.1016/j.labeco.2020.101938
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper examines the extent to which labor market reforms of temporary contracts introduced in Italy at the beginning of the century influenced aggregate productivity via their effects on allocative efficiency. Using firm level data from the Italian manufacturing sector, we compute the extent of resource allocation by the covariance between firm size and productivity, and we identify the impact of the reforms by exploiting the variation in their implementation across sectors and regions. Our results suggest that the reform of apprenticeship contracts has increased the size-productivity covariance, and this aggregate effect can be rationalized through a theoretical model where the apprenticeship contract reform allows highly productive firms to gain market shares by improving their training efficiency, and by inducing them to turn a higher fraction of apprentices into permanent workforce. By contrast, the deregulation of the use of fixed-term contracts shows heterogeneous effects, with negative results among regions with long labor court disputes, and positive ones among those with less lengthy settlement procedures. The legal uncertainty associated with the reform might have reduced the incentive to use fixed-term contracts for productive firms located in regions where judicial disputes take longer to be settled.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Corporate Tax Rates, Allocative Efficiency, and Aggregate Productivity [J].
Dinerstein, Marcos ;
Pena, Fausto Patino .
B E JOURNAL OF MACROECONOMICS, 2024, 24 (02) :633-675
[22]   Labor market reforms in Europe: Towards more flexicure labor markets? [J].
Eichhorst W. ;
Marx P. ;
Wehner C. .
Journal for Labour Market Research, 2017, 51 (1) :1-17
[23]   Labor market reforms, growth, and unemployment in labor-exporting countries in the Middle East and North Africa [J].
Agenor, Pierre-Richard ;
Nabli, Mustapha K. ;
Yousef, Tarik ;
Jensen, Henning Tarp .
JOURNAL OF POLICY MODELING, 2007, 29 (02) :277-309
[24]   Did the German Model Survive the Labor Market Reforms? [J].
Moeller, Joachim .
JOURNAL FOR LABOUR MARKET RESEARCH, 2015, 48 (02) :151-168
[25]   Pareto Efficiency and Allocative Efficiency [J].
Esposito, Fabrizio .
MATERIALI PER UNA STORIA DELLA CULTURA GIURIDICA, 2016, 46 (01) :225-236
[26]   Labor Market Reforms, Temporary Workers and Wage Inequality [J].
Kim, Hyeon-Kyeong ;
Skott, Peter .
METROECONOMICA, 2016, 67 (02) :313-333
[27]   The Quality-Weighted Matching Function: Did the German Labor Market Reforms Trade-Off Efficiency against Job Quality? [J].
Gartner, Hermann ;
Rothe, Thomas ;
Weber, Enzo .
JOURNAL OF MONEY CREDIT AND BANKING, 2024, 56 (07) :1905-1914
[28]   Tax reforms under market distortions in product and labour markets [J].
Angelopoulos, Konstantinos ;
Jiang, Wei ;
Malley, James R. .
EUROPEAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2013, 61 :28-42
[29]   Corporate governance and labor investment efficiency: International evidence from board reforms [J].
Le, Anh-Tuan ;
Thao Phuong Tran .
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE-AN INTERNATIONAL REVIEW, 2022, 30 (05) :555-583
[30]   EFFICIENCY AND LABOR MARKET DYNAMICS IN A MODEL OF LABOR SELECTION [J].
Chugh, Sanjay K. ;
Merkl, Christian .
INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2016, 57 (04) :1371-1404