Environmental Policy, Innovation, and Productivity Growth: Controlling the Effects of Regulation and Endogeneity

被引:88
作者
Hille, Erik [1 ]
Moebius, Patrick [1 ]
机构
[1] HHL Leipzig Grad Sch Management, Jahnallee 59, D-04109 Leipzig, Germany
关键词
Environmental regulation; Productivity growth; Innovation; Shadow prices; Energy prices; Endogeneity; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; PANEL-DATA EVIDENCE; EMPIRICAL-EVIDENCE; PORTER HYPOTHESIS; TECHNICAL CHANGE; ECO-INNOVATION; COMPETITIVENESS; STRINGENCY; IMPACT; TECHNOLOGY;
D O I
10.1007/s10640-018-0300-6
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We analyze the environmental regulation-productivity nexus and add to the literature in two main ways. First, shadow prices of energy and industrial energy prices are employed as relative measures of policy stringency. To ensure the robustness of the results, the model is also estimated for five alternative measures that have been applied in prior research. Second, we address the endogeneity of environmental regulation, innovation, and trade openness. A cross-country multi-sectoral dataset is utilized, including newly industrialized countries and former transition economies. The estimates show that the positive effects of increases in environmental policy stringency on productivity, which have often been reported in the more recent studies, change to mainly insignificant effects once simultaneity is controlled for. Hence, no support for the strong Porter Hypothesis can be found. Instead, stricter environmental regulation fosters innovation and, therefore, has an indirect, yet not decisive, positive effect on productivity growth.
引用
收藏
页码:1315 / 1355
页数:41
相关论文
共 98 条
[1]   Distance to frontier, selection, and economic growth [J].
Acemoglu, D ;
Aghion, P ;
Zilibotti, F .
JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC ASSOCIATION, 2006, 4 (01) :37-74
[2]   IDENTIFICATION PROPERTIES OF RECENT PRODUCTION FUNCTION ESTIMATORS [J].
Ackerberg, Daniel A. ;
Caves, Kevin ;
Frazer, Garth .
ECONOMETRICA, 2015, 83 (06) :2411-2451
[3]   Corporate governance, competition policy and industrial policy [J].
Aghion, P ;
Dewatripont, M ;
Rey, P .
EUROPEAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1997, 41 (3-5) :797-805
[4]   Joseph Schumpeter Lecture - Appropriate growth policy: A unifying framework [J].
Aghion, Philippe ;
Howitt, Peter .
JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC ASSOCIATION, 2006, 4 (2-3) :269-314
[5]   Environmental policies and productivity growth: Evidence across industries and firms [J].
Albrizio, Silvia ;
Kozluk, Tomasz ;
Zipperer, Vera .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2017, 81 :209-226
[6]   The Competitiveness Impacts of Climate Change Mitigation Policies [J].
Aldy, Joseph E. ;
Pizer, William A. .
JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMISTS, 2015, 2 (04) :565-595
[7]   Productivity growth and environmental regulation in Mexican and US food manufacturing [J].
Alpay, E ;
Buccola, S ;
Kerkvliet, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2002, 84 (04) :887-901
[8]   Measuring climate policy stringency: a shadow price approach [J].
Althammer, Wilhelm ;
Hille, Erik .
INTERNATIONAL TAX AND PUBLIC FINANCE, 2016, 23 (04) :607-639
[9]   A theoretical foundation of the Porter hypothesis [J].
Ambec, S ;
Barla, P .
ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2002, 75 (03) :355-360
[10]   The Porter Hypothesis at 20: Can Environmental Regulation Enhance Innovation and Competitiveness? [J].
Ambec, Stefan ;
Cohen, Mark A. ;
Elgie, Stewart ;
Lanoie, Paul .
REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND POLICY, 2013, 7 (01) :2-22