Lamotrigine and valproic acid have different effects on motorcortical neuronal excitability

被引:33
作者
Li, Xingbao [1 ]
Ricci, Raffaella [1 ]
Large, Charles H. [2 ]
Anderson, Berry [1 ]
Nahas, Ziad [1 ]
George, Mark S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ S Carolina, Brain Stimulat Lab, Dept Psychiat, MUSC IOP, Charleston, SC 29425 USA
[2] GlaxoSmithKline SpA, Med Res Ctr, Verona, Italy
关键词
Lamotrigine; Valproic acid; Transcranial magnetic stimulation; Motorcortical excitability; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; HUMAN MOTOR CORTEX; CORTICAL EXCITABILITY; SILENT PERIOD; CORTICOSPINAL PROJECTIONS; BRAIN-STIMULATION; INHIBITION; MECHANISMS; EPILEPSY; HUMANS;
D O I
10.1007/s00702-009-0195-z
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
To investigate different cortical effects of lamotrigine and valproic acid, 30 paid healthy adult men were given, in a randomized/blinded fashion on three separate days (separated by a week), either a single dose of lamotrigine 325 mg, or a single dose of valproic acid 1,250 mg, or placebo. Resting motor threshold (RMT), cortical silent period (CSP) and motor evoked potential recruitment curves (RC) were assessed at baseline and 3 h after administration of each medication (or placebo). Lamotrigine caused a significant increase (63.32 vs. 69.25) in the RMT, compared with an insignificant increase following valproic acid (62.50 vs. 63.35), and a decrease (62.60 vs. 62.36) following placebo (F (2,26) = 18.58, P < 0.0001). No significant difference in CSP was found between placebo and drugs (F (2,26) = 0.119, P > 0.05). RCs were significantly suppressed by lamotrigine (t = 2.07, P < 0.05) and enhanced by valproic acid (t = 2.39, P < 0.05). Lamotrigine and valproic acid have different effects on cortical neuronal excitability as demonstrated by TMS.
引用
收藏
页码:423 / 429
页数:7
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] A CLASSIFICATION OF HAND PREFERENCE BY ASSOCIATION ANALYSIS
    ANNETT, M
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1970, 61 (03) : 303 - &
  • [2] Estimating resting motor thresholds in transcranial magnetic stimulation research and practice: A computer simulation evaluation of best methods
    Borckardt, Jeffrey J.
    Nahas, Ziad
    Koola, Jejo
    George, Mark S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECT, 2006, 22 (03) : 169 - 175
  • [3] Pharmacologic influences on TMS effects
    Boroojerdi, B
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2002, 19 (04) : 255 - 271
  • [4] Mechanisms influencing stimulus-response properties of the human corticospinal system
    Boroojerdi, B
    Battaglia, F
    Muellbacher, W
    Cohen, LG
    [J]. CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2001, 112 (05) : 931 - 937
  • [5] CORTICOSPINAL PROJECTIONS TO UPPER AND LOWER-LIMB SPINAL MOTONEURONS IN MAN
    BROUWER, B
    ASHBY, P
    [J]. ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1990, 76 (06): : 509 - 519
  • [6] BROUWER B, 1992, EXP BRAIN RES, V89, P649
  • [7] Bryk A.S., 1992, HIERACHICAL LINEAR M
  • [8] APPLICATION OF HIERARCHICAL LINEAR-MODELS TO ASSESSING CHANGE
    BRYK, AS
    RAUDENBUSH, SW
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1987, 101 (01) : 147 - 158
  • [9] Excitability of the human epileptic cortex after chronic valproate: A reappraisal
    Cantello, Roberto
    Civardi, Carlo
    Varrasi, Claudia
    Vicentini, Roberta
    Cecchin, Michela
    Boccagni, Cristina
    Monaco, Francesco
    [J]. BRAIN RESEARCH, 2006, 1099 : 160 - 166
  • [10] Input-output properties and gain changes in the human corticospinal pathway
    Devanne, H
    Lavoie, BA
    Capaday, C
    [J]. EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 1997, 114 (02) : 329 - 338