A framework for assessing the quality of green infrastructure in the built environment in the UK

被引:38
|
作者
Jerome, Gemma [1 ,2 ]
Sinnett, Danielle [1 ]
Burgess, Sarah [1 ]
Calvert, Thomas [1 ]
Mortlock, Roger [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ West England, Ctr Sustainable Planning & Environm, Bristol, Avon, England
[2] Gloucestershire Wildlife Trust, Gloucester, England
基金
“创新英国”项目;
关键词
Built environment; Benchmark; Sustainable development; Ecosystem services; Nature conservation; PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY; MANAGEMENT; SPACE; BIODIVERSITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ufug.2019.04.001
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
The advocacy argument for green infrastructure has largely been won. Policy and statutory guidance for green infrastructure planning and development exists at international, national and regional/local levels and the functions and benefits of green infrastructure interventions are well evidenced in academic literature. To support this, professional bodies and experts from the built and natural environment have produced a multitude of practice guidance on the delivery of individual green infrastructure features. And yet, examples of high quality green infrastructure in new development schemes remain difficult to find, and the success of statutory guidance to accelerate this phenomenon surprisingly ineffective to manage change within the development sector. This paper presents a new framework for the delivery of high quality green infrastructure. Consultation with stakeholders in the UK suggested that a key factor affecting the translation of green infrastructure evidence, and policy and practice guidance, into delivery through planning and development is a lack of confidence amongst practitioners regarding the qualifies and characteristics of high quality green infrastructure in the built environment. The key characteristics of high quality green infrastructure, based on a review of both academic and grey literature, and extensive work with stakeholders are grouped into principles that underpin high quality green infrastructure (including the presence of a multifunctional network, and provision for long-term management), and principles related to health and wellbeing, water management and nature conservation. The resulting framework is presented as twenty three principles for delivering green infrastructure. This can be used internationally as a set of standards to assess the quality of green infrastructure to ensure that it contributes to quality of life, health and wellbeing of individuals and communities, flood resilient towns and cities, and places where nature can flourish and be more viable as a result of development.
引用
收藏
页码:174 / 182
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Challenges of mainstreaming green infrastructure in built environment professions
    Zuniga-Teran, Adriana A.
    Staddon, Chad
    de Vito, Laura
    Gerlak, Andrea K.
    Ward, Sarah
    Schoeman, Yolandi
    Hart, Aimee
    Booth, Giles
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2020, 63 (04) : 710 - 732
  • [2] Challenges of mainstreaming green infrastructure in built environment professions
    Zuniga-Teran, Adriana A.
    Staddon, Chad
    de Vito, Laura
    Gerlak, Andrea K.
    Ward, Sarah
    Schoeman, Yolandi
    JOURNAL OF PLANNING LITERATURE, 2022, 37 (01) : 178 - 178
  • [3] Infrastructure for the Built Environment
    Rowlinson, Steve
    CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND ECONOMICS, 2007, 25 (03) : 333 - 334
  • [4] CHICAGO WILDERNESS GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE VISION: CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES FOR THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT
    Dreher, Dennis
    JOURNAL OF GREEN BUILDING, 2009, 4 (03): : 72 - 88
  • [5] Infrastructure challenges for the built environment
    Roberts, Simon
    ENERGY POLICY, 2008, 36 (12) : 4563 - 4567
  • [6] Enhancing quality of teaching in the built environment higher education, UK
    Gomis, Kasun
    Saini, Mandeep
    Pathirage, Chaminda
    Arif, Mohammed
    QUALITY ASSURANCE IN EDUCATION, 2022, 30 (04) : 523 - 538
  • [7] A Methodological Framework of Assessing National Quality Infrastructure Efficacy for Quality Management
    Shen, Jing
    Zhang, Yang
    Zheng, Suli
    2019 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT (IEEM), 2019, : 1573 - 1577
  • [8] A framework for measuring social value in infrastructure and built environment projects: an industry perspective
    Fujiwara, Daniel
    Dass, Daniel
    King, Emily
    Vriend, Myriam
    Houston, Richard
    Keohane, Kieran
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERS-ENGINEERING SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 175 (04) : 175 - 185
  • [9] Resilient Built Environment: New Framework for Assessing the Residential Construction Market
    Zhao, Dong
    McCoy, Andrew P.
    Smoke, Jonathan
    JOURNAL OF ARCHITECTURAL ENGINEERING, 2015, 21 (04)
  • [10] Topological infrastructure analysis of the built environment
    Deleuran, Anders Holden
    Derix, Christian
    ENVISIONING ARCHITECTURE: DESIGN, EVALUATION, COMMUNICATION, 2013, : 419 - 426