The occurrence of adverse events potentially attributable to nursing care in medical units: Cross sectional record review

被引:45
|
作者
D'Amour, Danielle [1 ]
Dubois, Carl-Ardy [1 ]
Tchouaket, Eric [2 ]
Clarke, Sean [3 ]
Blais, Regis [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Montreal, Fac Nursing, Montreal, PQ H3C 3J7, Canada
[2] Univ Quebec Outaouais, Gatineau, PQ, Canada
[3] McGill Univ, Susan E French Chair Nursing Res, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[4] Univ Montreal, Fac Med, Dept Hlth Adm, Montreal, PQ H3C 3J7, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
Adverse events; Nursing-sensitive outcomes; Patient safety; Pressure sores; Falls; Medication administration errors; Inappropriate use of restraints; Pneumonia; Urinary infections; ORGANIZATIONAL SILENCE; INPATIENT FALLS; SAFETY; PREVALENCE; HOSPITALS; OUTCOMES; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2013.10.017
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Background: Ensuring the safety of hospitalized patients remains a major challenge for healthcare systems, and nursing services are at the center of hospital care. Yet our knowledge about safety of nursing care is quite limited. In fact, most earlier studies examined one, or at most two, indicators, thus presenting an incomplete picture of safety at an institutional or broader level. Furthermore, methodologies have differed from one study to another, making benchmarking difficult. Objectives: The aim of this study was to describe the frequencies of six adverse events widely considered in the literature to be nursing-sensitive outcomes and to estimate the degree to which these events could be attributed to nursing care. Method: Cross-sectional review of charts of 2699 patients hospitalized on 22 medical units in 11 hospitals in Quebec, Canada. The events included: pressure sores, falls, medication administration errors, pneumonias, urinary infections, and inappropriate use of restraints. Experienced nurse reviewers abstracted patients' charts based on a grid developed for the study. Results: Patient-level risk for at least one of these six adverse events was 15.3%, ranging from 9% to 28% across units. Of the 412 patients who experienced an event, 30% experienced two or more, for a total of 568 events. The risk of experiencing an adverse event with consequences was 6.2%, with a unit-level range from 3.2% to 13.5%. Abstractors concluded that 76.8% of the events were attributable to nursing care. Conclusion: While the measurement approach adopted here has limitations stemming from reliance on review of documentation, it provided a practical means of assessing several nursing-sensitive adverse events simultaneously. Given that patient safety issues are so complex, tracking their prevalence and impact is important, as is finding means of evaluating progress in reducing them. Crown Copyright (C) 2013 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:882 / 891
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Adverse events and contributing factors in Chinese nursing homes: a multisite cross-sectional study
    Wang, Zhangan
    Qi, Xiang
    Shi, Ying
    Shao, Lu
    Li, Wei
    Xie, Xiyan
    Wu, Bei
    Zhang, June
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2025, 13
  • [22] Missed nursing care in newborn units: a cross-sectional direct observational study
    Gathara, David
    Serem, George
    Murphy, Georgina A. V.
    Obengo, Alfred
    Tallam, Edna
    Jackson, Debra
    Brownie, Sharon
    English, Mike
    BMJ QUALITY & SAFETY, 2020, 29 (01) : 19 - 30
  • [23] Association between nursing work conditions and adverse events in neonatal and pealatric Intensive Care Units
    Sanches Maziero, Eliane Cristina
    de Almeida Cruz, Elaine Drehmer
    Alpendre, Francine Taporosky
    Brandao, Marilise Borges
    Rodrigues Teixeira, Fabiana Ferreira
    Krainski, Elias Teixeira
    REVISTA DA ESCOLA DE ENFERMAGEM DA USP, 2020, 54 : 1 - 8
  • [24] Adverse events and potentially preventable deaths in Dutch hospitals: results of a retrospective patient record review study
    Zegers, M.
    de Bruijne, M. C.
    Wagner, C.
    Hoonhout, L. H. F.
    Waaijman, R.
    Smits, M.
    Hout, F. A. G.
    Zwaan, L.
    Christiaans-Dingelhoff, I.
    Timmermans, D. R. M.
    Groenewegen, P. P.
    van der Wal, G.
    QUALITY & SAFETY IN HEALTH CARE, 2009, 18 (04): : 297 - U79
  • [25] Doctors are to blame for perceived medical adverse events. A cross sectional population study. The Tromso study
    Hotvedt, Ragnar
    Forde, Olav Helge
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2013, 13
  • [26] Adverse events at the end of life of hospital patients with or without a condition relevant for palliative care: a nationwide retrospective record review study in the Netherlands
    Schouten, B.
    van Schoten, S. M.
    Bijnsdorp, F. M.
    Merten, H.
    Nanayakkara, P. W. B.
    Reyners, A. K. L.
    Francke, A. L.
    Wagner, C.
    BMC PALLIATIVE CARE, 2024, 23 (01):
  • [27] Adverse events related to physical restraint use in intensive care units: A review of the literature
    Berger, Sebastian
    Grzonka, Pascale
    Amacher, Simon A.
    Hunziker, Sabina
    Frei, Anja I.
    Sutter, Raoul
    JOURNAL OF INTENSIVE MEDICINE, 2024, 4 (03): : 318 - 325
  • [28] Adverse events are common on the intensive care unit: results from a structured record review
    Nilsson, L.
    Pihl, A.
    Tagsjo, M.
    Ericsson, E.
    ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2012, 56 (08) : 959 - 965
  • [29] Adverse events identified by the global trigger tool at a university hospital: A retrospective medical record review
    Hu, Qiaozhi
    Wu, Bin
    Zhan, Mei
    Jia, Weiguo
    Huang, Yimei
    Xu, Ting
    JOURNAL OF EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE, 2019, 12 (02) : 91 - 97
  • [30] Assessing nursing quality in paediatric intensive care units: a cross-sectional study in China
    Zhang, Yuxia
    Liu, Linxia
    Hu, Jing
    Zhang, Yanhong
    Lu, Guoping
    Li, Guangyu
    Zuo, Zelan
    Lu, Hua
    Zou, Huan
    Wang, Zaihua
    Huang, Quelan
    NURSING IN CRITICAL CARE, 2017, 22 (06) : 355 - 361