Treatment Outcome of Second-Line Chemotherapy for Gynecologic Carcinosarcoma

被引:9
|
作者
Ebata, Takahiro [1 ]
Yonemori, Kan [1 ]
Nishikawa, Tadaaki [1 ,3 ]
Sudo, Kazuki [1 ]
Shimomura, Akihiko [1 ]
Noguchi, Emi [1 ]
Fujiwara, Yasuhiro [1 ]
Kato, Tomoyasu [2 ]
Hasegawa, Kosei [3 ]
Fujiwara, Keiichi [3 ]
Tamura, Kenji [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Canc Ctr, Dept Breast & Med Oncol, Tokyo, Japan
[2] Natl Canc Ctr, Dept Gynecol, Tokyo, Japan
[3] Saitama Med Univ, Dept Gynecol Oncol, Int Med Ctr, Hidaka City, Japan
关键词
Carcinosarcoma; Chemotherapy; Second-line chemotherapy; Treatment-free interval; PHASE-II EVALUATION; STAGE UTERINE CARCINOSARCOMA; RECURRENT; SURVIVAL; PLATINUM; UTERUS; IMPACT; TRIAL; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1159/000507333
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Introduction:Carcinosarcoma is a rare cancer, and its prognosis is poor. There are few reports on the prognostic factors of patients with carcinosarcoma who receive second-line chemotherapy.Objective:To investigate the outcome and prognostic factors of patients who received second-line chemotherapy for gynecologic carcinosarcoma.Methods:We retrospectively investigated patients with ovarian or uterine carcinosarcoma, who were treated at two institutions from July 2006 to March 2018. All patients who had received second-line chemotherapy for advanced or recurrent disease were eligible. The efficacy of second-line chemotherapy and prognostic factors were evaluated.Results:Forty-six patients were eligible. Combination chemotherapy was used in approximately half (52.2%) of the patients. The response rate and disease control rate of second-line chemotherapy were 32.6 and 60.9%, respectively. The median follow-up period was 11.0 (range, 8.8-107.5) months. The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 6.3 (95% CI, 3.2-7.5) months and 12.9 (95% CI, 7.8-16.0) months, respectively. In the multivariate analysis of overall survival, a treatment-free interval >180 days was a significant good prognostic factor. The median overall survival was 7.8 (95% CI, 5.1-10.5) months in the <180 days group and 16.4 (95% CI, 13.1-130.6) months in the >180 days group (p= 0.0052; hazard ratio, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.10-0.66), respectively.Conclusion:The outcome of gynecologic carcinosarcoma in the second-line setting is poor, especially in patients with a short treatment-free interval.
引用
收藏
页码:699 / 705
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The role of second-line chemotherapy in colorectal cancer
    Schmoll, HJ
    Buchele, T
    Schober, C
    ONKOLOGIE, 1997, 20 (04): : 288 - 294
  • [22] Combination Chemotherapy with Itraconazole for Treating Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer in the Second-line or Additional Setting
    Tsubamoto, Hiroshi
    Sonoda, Takashi
    Ikuta, Shinichi
    Tani, Satoshi
    Inoue, Kayo
    Yamanaka, Naoki
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2015, 35 (07) : 4191 - 4196
  • [23] Second-line palliative chemotherapy, survival, and prognostic factors in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer
    Ekstrom, Anders
    Brun, Eva
    Eberhard, Jakob
    Segerlantz, Mikael
    ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2021, 60 (12) : 1580 - 1588
  • [24] Maintenance Chemotherapy in Patients with Platinum-Sensitive Relapsed Epithelial Ovarian Cancer after Second-Line Chemotherapy
    Chen, Yen-Fu
    Hsu, Shih-Tien
    Hwang, Sheau-Feng
    Sun, Lou
    Liu, Chih-Ku
    Shih, Yu-Hsiang
    Lu, Ting-Fang
    Wang, Jun-Sing
    Lu, Chien-Hsing
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2024, 13 (02)
  • [25] Gemcitabine and paclitaxel chemotherapy as a second-line treatment for advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma
    Matsumoto, Kazumasa
    Irie, Akira
    Satoh, Takefumi
    Okazaki, Miyoko
    Iwamura, Masatsugu
    Baba, Shiro
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2007, 14 (11) : 1000 - 1004
  • [26] Accelerated second-line or maintenance chemotherapy versus treatment at disease progression in NSCLC
    Velez, Michel
    Belalcazar, Astrid
    Domingo, Gelenis
    Blaya, Marcelo
    Raez, Luis E.
    Santos, Edgardo S.
    EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTICANCER THERAPY, 2010, 10 (04) : 549 - 557
  • [27] Treatment outcomes of nanoliposomal irinotecan as second-line chemotherapy after gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel in metastatic and recurrent pancreatic cancer
    Mie, Takafumi
    Sasaki, Takashi
    Okamoto, Takeshi
    Takeda, Tsuyoshi
    Mori, Chinatsu
    Furukawa, Takaaki
    Kasuga, Akiyoshi
    Matsuyama, Masato
    Ozaka, Masato
    Sasahira, Naoki
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 52 (12) : 1399 - 1407
  • [28] Adjuvant Treatment Modalities, Prognostic Factors, and Outcome of the Uterine Carcinosarcoma
    Kahramanoglu, Ilker
    Demirkiran, Fuat
    Turan, Hasan
    Bese, Tugan
    Cebi, Sukru
    Ilvan, Sennur
    Arvas, Macit
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA, 2021, 43 (01) : 34 - 42
  • [29] Platinum rechallenge in second-line treatment for endometrial carcinoma
    Pereira Souza, R.
    Pinheiro Soares, G.
    Valente Lage, L.
    Baiocchi, G.
    da Costa, A. A. B. A.
    Eestevez Diz, M. del Pilar
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GYNAECOLOGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 40 (06) : 963 - 969
  • [30] Clinical Outcome of Paclitaxel and Carboplatin as Second-Line Chemotherapy for Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma Resistant to First-Line Therapy with Gemcitabine and Cisplatin
    Terakawa, Tomoaki
    Miyake, Hideaki
    Yokoyama, Naoki
    Miyazaki, Akira
    Tanaka, Hiroyuki
    Inoue, Takaaki
    Fujisawa, Masato
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2014, 92 (02) : 180 - 185