Treatment Outcome of Second-Line Chemotherapy for Gynecologic Carcinosarcoma

被引:9
|
作者
Ebata, Takahiro [1 ]
Yonemori, Kan [1 ]
Nishikawa, Tadaaki [1 ,3 ]
Sudo, Kazuki [1 ]
Shimomura, Akihiko [1 ]
Noguchi, Emi [1 ]
Fujiwara, Yasuhiro [1 ]
Kato, Tomoyasu [2 ]
Hasegawa, Kosei [3 ]
Fujiwara, Keiichi [3 ]
Tamura, Kenji [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Canc Ctr, Dept Breast & Med Oncol, Tokyo, Japan
[2] Natl Canc Ctr, Dept Gynecol, Tokyo, Japan
[3] Saitama Med Univ, Dept Gynecol Oncol, Int Med Ctr, Hidaka City, Japan
关键词
Carcinosarcoma; Chemotherapy; Second-line chemotherapy; Treatment-free interval; PHASE-II EVALUATION; STAGE UTERINE CARCINOSARCOMA; RECURRENT; SURVIVAL; PLATINUM; UTERUS; IMPACT; TRIAL; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1159/000507333
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Introduction:Carcinosarcoma is a rare cancer, and its prognosis is poor. There are few reports on the prognostic factors of patients with carcinosarcoma who receive second-line chemotherapy.Objective:To investigate the outcome and prognostic factors of patients who received second-line chemotherapy for gynecologic carcinosarcoma.Methods:We retrospectively investigated patients with ovarian or uterine carcinosarcoma, who were treated at two institutions from July 2006 to March 2018. All patients who had received second-line chemotherapy for advanced or recurrent disease were eligible. The efficacy of second-line chemotherapy and prognostic factors were evaluated.Results:Forty-six patients were eligible. Combination chemotherapy was used in approximately half (52.2%) of the patients. The response rate and disease control rate of second-line chemotherapy were 32.6 and 60.9%, respectively. The median follow-up period was 11.0 (range, 8.8-107.5) months. The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 6.3 (95% CI, 3.2-7.5) months and 12.9 (95% CI, 7.8-16.0) months, respectively. In the multivariate analysis of overall survival, a treatment-free interval >180 days was a significant good prognostic factor. The median overall survival was 7.8 (95% CI, 5.1-10.5) months in the <180 days group and 16.4 (95% CI, 13.1-130.6) months in the >180 days group (p= 0.0052; hazard ratio, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.10-0.66), respectively.Conclusion:The outcome of gynecologic carcinosarcoma in the second-line setting is poor, especially in patients with a short treatment-free interval.
引用
收藏
页码:699 / 705
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Outcome of Second-Line Treatment After First-Line Chemotherapy With the GONO FOLFOXIRI Regimen
    Fornaro, Lorenzo
    Vasile, Enrico
    Masi, Gianluca
    Loupakis, Fotios
    Baldi, Giacomo Giulio
    Allegrini, Giacomo
    Salvatore, Lisa
    Cremolini, Chiara
    Cupini, Samanta
    Cortesi, Enrico
    Tuzi, Alessandro
    Granetto, Cristina
    Brunetti, Isa Maura
    Ricci, Sergio
    Falcone, Alfredo
    CLINICAL COLORECTAL CANCER, 2012, 11 (01) : 71 - 76
  • [2] A phase II evaluation of weekly gemcitabine and docetaxel for second-line treatment of recurrent carcinosarcoma of the uterus: A gynecologic oncology group study
    Miller, Brigitte E.
    Blessing, John A.
    Stehman, Frederick B.
    Shahin, Mark S.
    Yamada, S. Diane
    Secord, Angeles Alvarez
    Warshal, David P.
    Abulafia, Ovadia
    Richards, William E.
    Van Le, Linda
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2010, 118 (02) : 139 - 144
  • [3] Poor Treatment Outcomes with Second-Line Chemotherapy in Advanced Synovial Sarcoma
    Kojima, Yuki
    Shimoi, Tatsunori
    Seo, Takuji
    Yazaki, Shu
    Okuya, Toshihiro
    Ohtake, Yohei
    Okuma, Hitomi S.
    Shimomura, Akihiko
    Nishikawa, Tadaaki
    Tanioka, Maki
    Sudo, Kazuki
    Noguchi, Emi
    Tamura, Kenji
    Yoshida, Akihiko
    Iwata, Shintaro
    Kobayashi, Eisuke
    Kawai, Akira
    Fujiwara, Yasuhiro
    Yonemori, Kan
    ONCOLOGY, 2022, 100 (07) : 370 - 375
  • [4] Second-line chemotherapy in biliary tract cancer: Outcome and prognostic factors
    Schweitzer, Nora
    Kirstein, Martha M.
    Kratzel, Anna-Maria
    Mederacke, Young-Seon
    Fischer, Mareike
    Manns, Michael P.
    Vogel, Arndt
    LIVER INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 39 (05) : 914 - 923
  • [5] Treatment Choices for Second-Line Chemotherapy of Metastatic Breast Cancer
    Christoph C. Zielinski
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2003, 81 (Suppl 1) : 33 - 36
  • [6] Treatment choices for second-line chemotherapy of metastatic breast cancer
    Zielinski, CC
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2003, 81 : S33 - S36
  • [7] Is combination chemotherapy superior to single-agent chemotherapy in second-line treatment?
    González-Martín, A
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2003, 13 : 185 - 191
  • [8] Efficacy and survival analysis of apatinib combined with capecitabine chemotherapy for second-line treatment of advanced esophageal cancer
    Xu, Jinfa
    Cai, Qing
    Zhang, Xiufang
    Zhang, Jianhua
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 29 (06) : 793 - 798
  • [9] Efficacy and toxicities of doxorubicin plus ifosfamide in the second-line treatment of uterine leiomyosarcoma
    Niu, Szu-Yun
    Sun, Lou
    Hsu, Shih-Tien
    Hwang, Sheau-Feng
    Liu, Chih-Ku
    Shih, Yu-Hsiang
    Lu, Ting-Fang
    Chen, Yen-Fu
    Lai, Li-Ching
    Chang, Pei-Lun
    Lu, Chien-Hsing
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2023, 13
  • [10] Chemotherapy beyond second-line in advanced gastric cancer
    Kim, Sung Min
    Park, Se Hoon
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2015, 21 (29) : 8811 - 8816