Efficacy of psychosocial interventions for smoking cessation in patients with coronary heart disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:37
|
作者
Barth, Juergen [1 ]
Critchley, Julia
Bengel, Juergen
机构
[1] Univ Freiburg, Inst Psychol, Dept Rehabil Pscyhol, D-79085 Freiburg, Germany
[2] Newcastle Univ, Sch Populat & Hlth Sci, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 7RU, Tyne & Wear, England
关键词
D O I
10.1207/s15324796abm3201_2
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Background: Quitting smoking improves prognosis after a cardiac event. Therefore smoking cessation is highly recommended for patients with coronary heart disease (CHD), but many patients continue to smoke, and improved cessation aids are urgently required. Purpose: The objective was to conduct a systematic review of the efficacy of psychosocial interventions to quit smoking in patients with CHD. Methods: Seven electronic databases were searched from the start of the database to August 2003. Search terms were coronary or cardio or heart or cvd or chd and smok* and cessation or absti*. Results were supplemented by cross-checking references. More than 2,000 papers were screened in a first step. Eligibility of studies was assessed (by reviewer Airgen Barth) and reasons for exclusion were coded. Abstinence rates were computed both according to an intention to treat analysis, and based on follow-up results only. Results: We found 19 randomized controlled trials, comparing a specific psychosocial intervention with "usual care," with a minimum of 6-month follow-up. Interventions consist of behavioral therapeutic approaches, telephone support, and self-help material. The trials mostly included older male patients with CHD, predominantly myocardial infarction. Overall results found a positive effect of interventions on abstinence after 6 to 12 months (OR = 1.66, 95% CI = 1.24-2.21), but substantial heterogeneity between trials. Clustering the trials by type of intervention reduced heterogeneity, although many trials used more than one type of intervention.. Trials involving behavioral therapies or telephone contact were little different from self-help techniques (OR = 1.65, 95% CI = 1.28-2.13 for behavioral therapies; OR = 1.58, 95% CI = 1.26-1.98 for telephone support; OR = 1.47, 95% CI = 1.10-1.97 for self-help). Treatment intensity was associated with study outcome. More intense interventions showed increased quit rates (OR = 1.95, 95% CI = 1.61-2.35) whereas interventions of low intensity did not appear effective (OR = 0.92, 95% CI = 0.70-1.22). Studies with validated assessment of smoking status atfollow-up had lower efficacy than nonvalidated trials. Conclusions: Smoking cessation interventions are effective in promoting abstinence up to I year, provided they are of sufficient intensity with a minimum length of I month. Further studies should compare different psychosocial intervention strategies, or the combination of a psychosocial intervention strategy with nicotine replacement therapy or bupropion compared with nicotine replacement or bupropion alone.
引用
收藏
页码:10 / 20
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The effectiveness of smoking cessation interventions after cancer diagnosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Scholten, Peter R.
    Stalpers, Lukas J. A.
    Bronsema, Iris
    van Os, Rob M.
    Westerveld, Henrike
    van Lonkhuijzen, Luc R. C. W.
    JOURNAL OF CANCER POLICY, 2024, 39
  • [42] COMMUNITY PHARMACY PERSONNEL INTERVENTIONS FOR SMOKING CESSATION: A COCHRANE SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Carson, K.
    To-A-Nan, R.
    Robertson, M.
    King, C.
    Smith, B.
    RESPIROLOGY, 2015, 20 : 16 - 16
  • [43] Text Messaging-Based Interventions for Smoking Cessation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Scott-Sheldon, Lori A. J.
    Lantini, Ryan
    Jennings, Ernestine G.
    Thind, Herpreet
    Rosen, Rochelle K.
    Salmoirago-Blotcher, Elena
    Bock, Beth C.
    JMIR MHEALTH AND UHEALTH, 2016, 4 (02): : 337 - 360
  • [44] Self-help smoking cessation interventions in pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Naughton, Felix
    Prevost, A. Toby
    Sutton, Stephen
    ADDICTION, 2008, 103 (04) : 566 - 579
  • [45] Smoking cessation interventions on health-care workers: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    La Torre, Giuseppe
    Tiberio, Generosa
    Sindoni, Alessandro
    Dorelli, Barbara
    Cammalleri, Vittoria
    PEERJ, 2020, 8
  • [46] Cytisine for smoking cessation: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ofori, Sandra
    Lu, Clara
    Olasupo, Omotola O.
    Dennis, Brittany B.
    Fairbairn, Nadia
    Devereaux, P. J.
    Mbuagbaw, Lawrence
    DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE, 2023, 251
  • [47] Effectiveness of Peer-Support Interventions for Smoking Cessation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Yuan, Patrick
    Westmaas, J. Lee
    Thrul, Johannes
    Toussaert, Severine
    Hilton, Joan F.
    White, Justin S.
    NICOTINE & TOBACCO RESEARCH, 2023, 25 (09) : 1515 - 1524
  • [48] PHARMACOLOGICAL INTERVENTIONS FOR SMOKING CESSATION AMONG PEOPLE WITH SCHIZOPHRENIA: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Siskind, Dan
    Wu, Brian
    Wong, Tommy
    Kisely, Steve
    SCHIZOPHRENIA BULLETIN, 2020, 46 : S168 - S168
  • [49] Conversational artificial intelligence interventions to support smoking cessation: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Bendotti, Hollie
    Lawler, Sheleigh
    Chan, Gary C. K.
    Gartner, Coral
    Ireland, David
    Marshall, Henry M.
    DIGITAL HEALTH, 2023, 9
  • [50] Smoking cessation interventions for adults aged 50 or older: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chen, Danhong
    Wu, Li-Tzy
    DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE, 2015, 154 : 14 - 24