Measurements of auditory-verbal STM span in aphasia: Effects of item, task, and lexical impairment

被引:87
作者
Martin, N [1 ]
Ayala, J [1 ]
机构
[1] Temple Univ, Dept Commun Sci, Ctr Cognit Neurosci, Philadelphia, PA 19122 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.bandl.2003.12.004
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
In the first part of this study, we investigated effects of item and task type on span performance in a group of aphasic individuals with word processing and STM deficits. Group analyses revealed significant effects of item on span performance with span being greater for digits than for words. We also investigated associations between subjects' lexical-semantic and phonological processing abilities and performance on four measures of verbal span (digit and word span, each varied for type of response, verbal vs. pointing) as well as one measure of nonverbal span. We predicted and found that the patterns of association between verbal span tasks and lexical abilities reflected the integrity of language processes and representations deployed in each paradigm used to assess span. Performance on the pointing span task, which engages both lexical-semantic and phonological processes, correlated with measures of both lexical-semantic and phonological abilities. Performance on repetition span, which engages primarily input and output phonological processes, correlated with measures of phonological abilities but not measures of lexical-semantic abilities. However, when partial correlations were performed for two subject groups based on their relative preservation of lexical-semantic ability (less or more than phonological ability), repetition span correlated with lexical-semantic measures only in the subgroup with relatively impaired lexical-semantics. Additionally, performance on the nonverbal span task correlated with measures of phonological abilities, suggesting either a general cognitive deficit affecting verbal and nonverbal STM or possibly, the use of a verbal strategy to perform this task. Our discussion focuses on the interpretation of span measurements in clinical practice and research, as well as the implications of these data for theories of short-term memory and word processing. (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:464 / 483
页数:20
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]  
ALLPORT DA, 1984, ATTENTION PERFORM, V10, P313
[2]  
AMRTIN N, 2000, P 6 INT C SPOK LANG, V2, P20
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1990, Neuropsychological impairments os short term memory, DOI DOI 10.1017/CB09780511665547.016
[4]  
[Anonymous], NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL I
[5]  
Baddeley A., 1974, PSYCHOL LEARNING MOT, V8
[6]  
Baddeley A., 1986, WORKING MEMORY
[7]   An experimental investigation of memory span [J].
Brener, R .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1940, 26 (05) :467-482
[8]   FURTHER EVIDENCE OF THE INTRICACY OF MEMORY SPAN [J].
BROOKS, JO ;
WATKINS, MJ .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 1990, 16 (06) :1134-1141
[9]  
CAMPBELL R, 1984, ATTENTION PERFORM, V10, P300
[10]   WHERE DO SEMANTIC ERRORS COME FROM [J].
CARAMAZZA, A ;
HILLIS, AE .
CORTEX, 1990, 26 (01) :95-122