Shock-induced termination of reentrant cardiac arrhythmias: Comparing monophasic and biphasic shock protocols

被引:14
作者
Bragard, Jean [1 ]
Simic, Ana [1 ]
Elorza, Jorge [1 ]
Grigoriev, Roman O. [2 ]
Cherry, Elizabeth M. [3 ]
Gilmour, Robert F., Jr. [4 ]
Otani, Niels F. [3 ,5 ]
Fenton, Flavio H. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Navarra, Dept Phys & Appl Math, E-31080 Pamplona, Spain
[2] Georgia Inst Technol, Sch Phys, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
[3] Rochester Inst Technol, Sch Math Sci, Rochester, NY 14623 USA
[4] Univ Prince Edward Isl, Charlottetown, PE C1A 4P3, Canada
[5] Cornell Univ, Dept Biomed Sci, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会; 美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
FAR-FIELD; DEFIBRILLATION EFFICACY; WAVE-FORMS; MECHANISM; ALTERNANS; MODEL; ANNIHILATION; FIBRILLATION; STIMULATION; SIMULATION;
D O I
10.1063/1.4829632
中图分类号
O29 [应用数学];
学科分类号
070104 ;
摘要
In this article, we compare quantitatively the efficiency of three different protocols commonly used in commercial defibrillators. These are based on monophasic and both symmetric and asymmetric biphasic shocks. A numerical one-dimensional model of cardiac tissue using the bidomain formulation is used in order to test the different protocols. In particular, we performed a total of 4.8 x 10(6) simulations by varying shock waveform, shock energy, initial conditions, and heterogeneity in internal electrical conductivity. Whenever the shock successfully removed the reentrant dynamics in the tissue, we classified the mechanism. The analysis of the numerical data shows that biphasic shocks are significantly more efficient (by about 25%) than the corresponding monophasic ones. We determine that the increase in efficiency of the biphasic shocks can be explained by the higher proportion of newly excited tissue through the mechanism of direct activation. (C) 2013 AIP Publishing LLC.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Adaptive detached eddy simulations of incident shock-induced separation
    Vayala, Siva
    Vadlamani, Nagabhushana Rao
    Sriram, R.
    PHYSICS OF FLUIDS, 2025, 37 (01)
  • [32] Reynolds Number and Mach Number Effects on the Shock-Induced Separation
    Zuo, Feng-Yuan
    Shen, Yu
    Wei, Jia-Rui
    Hu, Shu-Ling
    AIAA JOURNAL, 2024, 62 (04) : 1618 - 1625
  • [33] Numerical prediction of envelope oscillation phenomena of shock-induced combustion
    Matsuo, A
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE JAPAN SOCIETY FOR AERONAUTICAL AND SPACE SCIENCES, 1998, 41 (133) : 140 - 143
  • [34] Comparison of multiphase models for computing shock-induced bubble collapse
    Goncalves Da Silva, Eric
    Parnaudeau, Philippe
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NUMERICAL METHODS FOR HEAT & FLUID FLOW, 2020, 30 (08) : 3845 - 3877
  • [35] A level set approach for shock-induced α-γ phase transition of RDX
    Josyula, Kartik
    Rahul
    De, Suvranu
    COMPUTATIONAL MECHANICS, 2018, 61 (1-2) : 19 - 32
  • [36] Similarity between Shock-Induced Polymorphic Transitions in the Silica System
    Kinelovskii, S. A.
    TECHNICAL PHYSICS, 2023, 68 (SUPPL 2) : S273 - S279
  • [37] Influence of length on shock-induced breaking behavior of copper nanowires
    Liu, Yunhong
    Zhao, Jianwei
    Wang, Fenying
    PHYSICAL REVIEW B, 2009, 80 (11)
  • [38] Numerical investigation of shock-induced bubble collapse near a rigid wall
    Shukla, Ratnesh K.
    IUTAM SYMPOSIUM ON MULTIPHASE FLOWS WITH PHASE CHANGE: CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES, 2015, 15 : 158 - 164
  • [39] Examination of the α-ω Two-Phase Shock-Induced Microstructure in Zirconium and Titanium
    Morrow, Benjamin M.
    Escobedo, J. Pablo
    Field, Robert D.
    Dickerson, Robert M.
    Dickerson, Patricia O.
    Trujillo, Carl P.
    Cerreta, Ellen K.
    SHOCK COMPRESSION OF CONDENSED MATTER - 2015, 2017, 1793
  • [40] Shock-induced vorticity variation model of supersonic planar mixing layers
    Feng, Junhong
    Lu, Junyong
    Shen, Chibing
    MODERN PHYSICS LETTERS B, 2021, 35 (03):