Evidence for Health II: Overcoming barriers to using evidence in policy and practice

被引:43
作者
Andermann, Anne [1 ,2 ]
Pang, Tikki [3 ]
Newton, John N. [4 ]
Davis, Adrian [5 ]
Panisset, Ulysses [6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Fac Med, Dept Family Med, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[2] McGill Univ, Fac Med, Dept Epidemiol Biostat & Occupat Hlth, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[3] Natl Univ Singapore, Lee Kuan Yew Sch Publ Policy, Singapore 117548, Singapore
[4] Univ Manchester, Fac Med & Human Sci, Inst Populat Hlth, Manchester, Lancs, England
[5] Publ Hlth England, London, England
[6] Univ Fed Minas Gerais, Fac Med, Dept Prevent & Social Med Hlth Policy, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
[7] WHO, Evidence Informed Policy Network EVIPNet, Steering Grp, CH-1211 Geneva, Switzerland
来源
HEALTH RESEARCH POLICY AND SYSTEMS | 2016年 / 14卷
关键词
Barriers; Decision-making; Evidence based medicine; Health policy; Public health; Research; SECONDHAND SMOKE; RESEARCH IMPACT; TOBACCO;
D O I
10.1186/s12961-016-0086-3
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Even the highest quality evidence will have little impact unless it is incorporated into decision-making for health. It is therefore critical to overcome the many barriers to using evidence in decision-making, including (1) missing the window of opportunity, (2) knowledge gaps and uncertainty, (3) controversy, irrelevant and conflicting evidence, as well as (4) vested interests and conflicts of interest. While this is certainly not a comprehensive list, it covers a number of main themes discussed in the knowledge translation literature on this topic, and better understanding these barriers can help readers of the evidence to be more savvy knowledge users and help researchers overcome challenges to getting their evidence into practice. Thus, the first step in being able to use research evidence for improving population health is ensuring that the evidence is available at the right time and in the right format and language so that knowledge users can take the evidence into consideration alongside a multitude of other factors that also influence decision-making. The sheer volume of scientific publications makes it difficult to find the evidence that can actually help inform decisions for health. Policymakers, especially in low-and middle-income countries, require context-specific evidence to ensure local relevance. Knowledge synthesis and dissemination of policy-relevant local evidence is important, but it is still not enough. There are times when the interpretation of the evidence leads to various controversies and disagreements, which act as barriers to the uptake of evidence. Research evidence can also be influenced and misused for various aims and agendas. It is therefore important to ensure that any new evidence comes from reliable sources and is interpreted in light of the overall body of scientific literature. It is not enough to simply produce evidence, nor even to synthesize and package evidence into a more user-friendly format. Particularly at the policy level, political savvy is also needed to ensure that vested interests do not undermine decisions that can impact the health of individuals and populations.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [11] Brach C., 2008, Will it work here? A decisionmaker's guide to adopting innovations
  • [12] Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination, 1994, CAN GUID CLIN PREV H
  • [13] The ethics of the cash register: taking tobacco research dollars
    Chapman, S
    Shatenstein, S
    [J]. TOBACCO CONTROL, 2001, 10 (01) : 1 - 2
  • [14] Cluzeau F, 2003, QUAL SAF HEALTH CARE, V12, P18
  • [15] Commission on Health Research for Development, 1990, HLTH RES ESS LINK EQ
  • [16] Finkel M.L., 2005, Understanding the mammography controversy: science, politics, and breast cancer screening
  • [17] Garba Stephen, 2010, Oman Med J, V25, P311, DOI 10.5001/omj.2010.89
  • [18] Gotzsche P.C., 2001, COCHRANE DB SYST REV, P001877
  • [19] Screening for breast cancer with mammography
    Gotzsche, Peter C.
    Nielsen, Margrethe
    [J]. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2011, (01):
  • [20] Breast screening: the facts-or maybe not
    Gotzsche, Peter C.
    Hartling, Ole J.
    Nielsen, Margrethe
    Brodersen, John
    Jorgensen, Karsten Juhl
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2009, 338 : b86