Mood Induction Differently Affects Early Neural Correlates of Evaluative Word Processing in L1 and L2

被引:21
作者
Kissler, Johanna [1 ]
Bromberek-Dyzman, Katarzyna [2 ]
机构
[1] Bielefeld Univ, Dept Psychol, Bielefeld, Germany
[2] Adam Mickiewicz Univ, Fac English, Poznan, Poland
来源
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY | 2021年 / 11卷
关键词
mood; emotion; language; bilingualism; word processing; context; EVENT-RELATED POTENTIALS; TIME-COURSE; BRAIN POTENTIALS; EMOTIONAL STATE; EYE-MOVEMENTS; LANGUAGE; RECOGNITION; 2ND-LANGUAGE; RESPONSES; VALENCE;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2020.588902
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
We investigate how mood inductions impact the neural processing of emotional adjectives in one's first language (L1) and a formally acquired second language (L2). Twenty-three student participants took part in an EEG experiment with two separate sessions. Happy or sad mood inductions were followed by series of individually presented positive, negative, or neutral adjectives in L1 (German) or L2 (English) and evaluative decisions had to be performed. Visual event-related potentials elicited during word processing were analyzed during N1 (125-200 ms), Early Posterior Negativities (EPN, 200-300 ms and 300-400 ms), N400 (350-450 ms), and the Late Positive Potential (LPP, 500-700 ms). Mood induction differentially impacted word processing already on the N1, with stronger left lateralization following happy than sad mood induction in L1, but not in L2. Moreover, regardless of language, early valence modulation was found following happy but not sad mood induction. Over occipital areas, happy mood elicited larger amplitudes of the mood-congruent positive words, whereas over temporal areas mood-incongruent negative words had higher amplitudes. In the EPN-windows, effects of mood and valence largely persisted, albeit with no difference between L1 and L2. N400 amplitude was larger for L2 than for L1. On the LPP, mood-incongruent adjectives elicited larger amplitudes than mood-congruent ones. Results reveal a remarkably early valence-general effect of mood induction on cortical processing, in line with previous reports of N1 as a first marker of contextual integration. Interestingly, this effect differed between L1 and L2. Moreover, mood-congruent effects were found in perceptual processing and mood-incongruent ERP amplification in higher-order evaluative stages.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 101 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2018, STUD SURREAL, DOI DOI 10.1002/9781119170174.EPCN310
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2003, PSYCHOL EVAL
[3]   BRAIN RESPONSES TO SEMANTIC INCONGRUITY IN BILINGUALS [J].
ARDAL, S ;
DONALD, MW ;
MEUTER, R ;
MULDREW, S ;
LUCE, M .
BRAIN AND LANGUAGE, 1990, 39 (02) :187-205
[4]   Embodiment and Emotional Memory in First vs. Second Language [J].
Baumeister, Jenny C. ;
Foroni, Francesco ;
Conrad, Markus ;
Rumiati, Raffaella I. ;
Winkielman, Piotr .
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2017, 8
[5]   P1 and beyond: Functional separation of multiple emotion effects in word recognition [J].
Bayer, Mareike ;
Sommer, Werner ;
Schacht, Annekathrin .
PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2012, 49 (07) :959-969
[6]  
Beck A.T., 2001, BECK DEPRESSIONS INV, V1
[7]   Presidential Address 2014: The more-or-less interrupting effects of the startle response [J].
Blumenthal, Terry D. .
PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2015, 52 (11) :1417-1431
[8]   MOOD AND MEMORY [J].
BOWER, GH .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1981, 36 (02) :129-148
[9]   MEASURING EMOTION - THE SELF-ASSESSMENT MANNEQUIN AND THE SEMANTIC DIFFERENTIAL [J].
BRADLEY, MM ;
LANG, PJ .
JOURNAL OF BEHAVIOR THERAPY AND EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHIATRY, 1994, 25 (01) :49-59
[10]   Emotion word recognition: Discrete information effects first, continuous later? [J].
Briesemeister, Benny B. ;
Kuchinke, Lars ;
Jacobs, Arthur M. .
BRAIN RESEARCH, 2014, 1564 :62-71