Dose calculation accuracy in proximity of a pacemaker: A multicenter study with threecommercial treatment planning systems

被引:5
作者
Delana, Anna [1 ]
Barbareschi, Agnese [2 ]
Consorti, Rita [3 ]
Falco, Maria Daniela [4 ]
机构
[1] Santa Chiara Hosp, Dept Med Phys, APSS Trento, Trento, Italy
[2] ASST Spedali Civili Brescia, Dept Med Phys, Brescia, Italy
[3] San Filippo Neri Hosp ASL Roma 1, Dept Med Phys, Rome, Italy
[4] Univ G dAnnunzio, SS Annunziata Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Chieti, Italy
来源
PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS | 2020年 / 80卷
关键词
Out-of-field dose; Pacemaker; Radiotherapy; Treatment planning; System; Dose calculation accuracy; OUT-OF-FIELD; MODULATED RADIATION-THERAPY; MONTE-CARLO; RADIOTHERAPY; BEAM; MANAGEMENT; DEVICES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.10.015
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
This study compares Treatment Planning System (TPS) out of field dose calculation on a pacemaker (PMK) during external beam radiotherapy treatment. We consider four TPSs (Elekta-Monaco, Oncentra-Masterplan and two Philips-Pinnacle3) commissioned for two linacs (Elekta Sinergy and Varian Clinac) delivering two test beams (a highly modulated one and a square field) and two clinical breast plans. To calculate and measure dose to a PMK we built a Real Water3 phantom with a PMK embedded in it. Measures are performed with thermo-luminescent dosimeters and Mosfet dosimeters. We evaluate differences between TPS calculated values for the dose to the PMK (both point dose and dose-volume histogram parameters) when the PMK is positioned in the first 10 cm outside the radiation fields. TPS calculation accuracy is evaluated comparing such values with measures. Differences in TPS calculations are on average 3.5 cGy Gy(-1) for the modulated beam, and always lower than 2 cGy Gy(-1) for the square beam. TPS dose calculation depends mostly on the TPS algorithm and model rather than the linac commissioned. TPSs considered show different degrees of calculation accuracy. In the first 4 cm to the field edge three out of four TPSs are in good agreement with measurements in the square beam, but only one keeps the agreement in the modulated beam: the others show over and underestimations up to +20% -40%. The same accuracy is found considering a homogeneous phantom. Our results confirm what reported in previous studies and highlight the impact of TPS commissioning.
引用
收藏
页码:201 / 208
页数:8
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] Low-dose measurement with a MOSFET in high-energy radiotherapy applications
    Cheung, T
    Yu, PKN
    Butson, MJ
    [J]. RADIATION MEASUREMENTS, 2005, 39 (01) : 91 - 94
  • [2] Quantification of beam complexity in intensity-modulated radiation therapy treatment plans
    Du, Weiliang
    Cho, Sang Hyun
    Zhang, Xiaodong
    Hoffman, Karen E.
    Kudchadker, Rajat J.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 41 (02)
  • [3] Near surface photon energy spectra outside a 6 MV field edge
    Edwards, CR
    Mountford, PJ
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2004, 49 (18) : N293 - N301
  • [4] Fast Monte Carlo dose calculation for photon beams based on the VMC electron algorithm
    Fippel, M
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1999, 26 (08) : 1466 - 1475
  • [5] Gauter-Fleckenstein B, RADIOTHER ONCOL
  • [6] Gauter-Fleckenstein B, 2015, STRAHLENTHER ONKOL, V191, P393, DOI 10.1007/s00066-015-0817-3
  • [7] Methodology for determining doses to in-field, out-of-field and partially in-field organs for late effects studies in photon radiotherapy
    Howell, Rebecca M.
    Scarboro, Sarah B.
    Taddei, Phillip J.
    Krishnan, Sunil
    Kry, Stephen F.
    Newhauser, Wayne D.
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2010, 55 (23) : 7009 - 7023
  • [8] Accuracy of out-of-field dose calculations by a commercial treatment planning system
    Howell, Rebecca M.
    Scarboro, Sarah B.
    Kry, S. F.
    Yaldo, Derek Z.
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2010, 55 (23) : 6999 - 7008
  • [9] Accuracy and sources of error of out-of field dose calculations by a commercial treatment planning system for intensity-modulated radiation therapy treatments
    Huang, Jessie Y.
    Followill, David S.
    Wang, Xin A.
    Kry, Stephen F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2013, 14 (02): : 186 - 197
  • [10] Management of radiation oncology patients with a pacemaker or ICD: A new comprehensive practical guideline in The Netherlands
    Hurkmans, Coen W.
    Knegjens, Joost L.
    Oei, Bing S.
    Maas, Ad J. J.
    Uiterwaal, G. J.
    van der Borden, Arnoud J.
    Ploegmakers, Marleen M. J.
    van Erven, Lieselot
    [J]. RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2012, 7