Evaluating the performance of futures hedging using multivariate realized volatility

被引:2
作者
Ubukata, Masato [1 ]
Watanabe, Toshiaki [2 ]
机构
[1] Kushiro Publ Univ Econ, Dept Econ, Kushiro, Hokkaido 0858585, Japan
[2] Hitotsubashi Univ, Inst Econ Res, Tokyo, Japan
关键词
Realized covariance matrix; Optimal hedge ratio; Conditional hedging model; High-frequency data; HIGH-FREQUENCY DATA; MICROSTRUCTURE NOISE; COVARIANCE ESTIMATION; ECONOMETRIC-ANALYSIS; QUANTILE FORECASTS; ECONOMIC VALUE; GARCH; VARIANCE; RETURNS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.jjie.2015.07.001
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper investigates the performance of a conditional hedging model using the realized covariance measure (RCM) with noisy high-frequency data. We employ a bivariate realized exponential GARCH (BREG) model with some RCMs to estimate conditional optimal hedge ratios in the Japanese stock and futures markets. The bivariate Student's t-distribution as well as the bivariate normal distribution are used for the return distribution. The out-of-sample results show that the BREG model outperforms the DCC-EGARCH model and the OLS approach using daily returns for a short hedge in the period without unpredictably large fluctuations in returns such as the Lehman aftermath and the economic impact of the Great East Japan Earthquake. The BREG model with a Student's t-distribution is likely to be superior to that with a normal distribution. The use of RCMs with methods reducing bias induced by microstructure noise and non-synchronous trading improves the performance. We also find that the joint model of returns and RCM such as the BREG model yields better performance for a short hedge than a model in which RCM is included as an exogenous variable. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:148 / 171
页数:24
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]   Answering the skeptics: Yes, standard volatility models do provide accurate forecasts [J].
Andersen, TG ;
Bollerslev, T .
INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1998, 39 (04) :885-905
[2]   Modeling and forecasting realized volatility [J].
Andersen, TG ;
Bollerslev, T ;
Diebold, FX ;
Labys, P .
ECONOMETRICA, 2003, 71 (02) :579-625
[3]   Roughing it up: Including jump components in the measurement, modeling, and forecasting of return volatility [J].
Andersen, Torben G. ;
Bollerslev, Tim ;
Diebold, Francis X. .
REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 2007, 89 (04) :701-720
[4]   Jump-robust volatility estimation using nearest neighbor truncation [J].
Andersen, Torben G. ;
Dobrev, Dobrislav ;
Schaumburg, Ernst .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 2012, 169 (01) :75-93
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1997, The econometrics of financial markets, DOI DOI 10.1515/9781400830213
[6]  
Ashiya M., 2003, OIKONOMIKA, V39, P1
[7]   BIVARIATE GARCH ESTIMATION OF THE OPTIMAL COMMODITY FUTURES HEDGE [J].
BAILLIE, RT ;
MYERS, RJ .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECONOMETRICS, 1991, 6 (02) :109-124
[8]   Microstructure noise, realized variance, and optimal sampling [J].
Bandi, F. M. ;
Russell, J. R. .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 2008, 75 (02) :339-369
[9]   Using high-frequency data in dynamic portfolio choice [J].
Bandi, Federico M. ;
Russell, Jeffrey R. ;
Zhu, Yinghua .
ECONOMETRIC REVIEWS, 2008, 27 (1-3) :163-198
[10]   Realized volatility forecasting and option pricing [J].
Bandi, Federico M. ;
Russell, Jeffrey R. ;
Yang, Chen .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 2008, 147 (01) :34-46