Beef quality assurance schemes: Can they improve farm economic performance?

被引:1
作者
Tsakiridis, Andreas [1 ,2 ]
Wallace, Michael [2 ]
Breen, James [2 ]
O'Donoghue, Cathal [3 ]
Hanrahan, Kevin [1 ]
机构
[1] TEAGASC, Agr Econ & Farm Surveys Dept, Mellows Campus, Athenry H65 R718, Galway, Ireland
[2] Univ Coll Dublin, Sch Agr & Food Sci, Div Agribusiness & Rural Dev, Dublin, Ireland
[3] Natl Univ Ireland Galway, Coll Arts Social Sci & Celt Studies, Galway, Ireland
关键词
beef quality assurance schemes; gross margins; impact assessment; Ireland; self‐ selection bias; TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION; SELECTION BIAS; EXTENSION SERVICES; SAMPLE SELECTION; PRICE PREMIUMS; FOOD SECURITY; DAIRY CALF; CATTLE; IMPACT; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1002/agr.21689
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
Beef quality assurance initiatives have been developed to assure consumers of the quality and safety of supplied beef, as well as the environmental-orientation of farm production practices. However, the potential economic benefits of quality schemes to European beef cattle farmers have been overlooked. This paper uses farm-level data to identify the drivers of Irish farmers' participation in Bord Bia's Beef and Lamb Quality Assurance Scheme (BLQAS) in 2012, and assesses the impact of participation on farm gross margins. After controlling for potential self-selection bias, we cannot find reliable evidence that the gross margins of participants in beef quality assurance schemes have been affected by their decision to participate. Consequently, lack of financial incentives can be a barrier to farmer participation in beef quality assurance schemes [EconLit citations: L25, M21, Q12].
引用
收藏
页码:451 / 471
页数:21
相关论文
共 102 条
  • [1] Dial "A" for agriculture: a review of information and communication technologies for agricultural extension in developing countries
    Aker, Jenny C.
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2011, 42 (06) : 631 - 647
  • [2] Illegal fishing and catch potentials among small-scale fishers: application of an endogenous Switching regression model
    Akpalu, Wisdom
    Normanyo, Ametefee K.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2014, 19 (02) : 156 - 172
  • [3] Improving Welfare Through Climate-Friendly Agriculture: The Case of the System of Rice Intensification
    Alem, Yonas
    Eggert, Hakan
    Ruhinduka, Remidius
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2015, 62 (02) : 243 - 263
  • [4] Andersson M, 2009, J INT FOOD AGRIBUS M, V21, P312, DOI 10.1080/08974430903007825
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2013, IRISH INDEPENDENT
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2017, IRISH INDEPENDENT
  • [7] Simulation modelling of temperate grassland based dairy calf to beef production systems
    Ashfield, A.
    Crosson, P.
    Wallace, M.
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2013, 115 : 41 - 50
  • [8] Ashfield A., 2014, Int. J. Agric. Manage., V3, P175, DOI [10.22004/ag.econ.236909, DOI 10.22004/AG.ECON.236909]
  • [9] Avent R. K., 2004, Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, V36, P173
  • [10] Impact of Product Familiarity on Beef Quality Perception
    Banovic, Marija
    Fontes, Magda Aguiar
    Barreira, Maria Madalena
    Grunert, Klaus G.
    [J]. AGRIBUSINESS, 2012, 28 (02) : 157 - 172