Accuracy of Contrast-enhanced US for Differentiating Benign from Malignant Solid Small Renal Masses

被引:37
作者
Atri, Mostafa [1 ]
Tabatabaeifar, Leila [1 ]
Jang, Hyun-Jung [1 ]
Finelli, Anthony [2 ]
Moshonov, Hadas [3 ]
Jewett, Michael [2 ]
机构
[1] Toronto Gen Hosp, Univ Hlth Network, Dept Med Imaging, Toronto, ON M5G 2N2, Canada
[2] Toronto Gen Hosp, Univ Hlth Network, Dept Urol, Toronto, ON M5G 2N2, Canada
[3] Toronto Gen Hosp, Univ Hlth Network, Dept Stat, Toronto, ON M5G 2N2, Canada
关键词
NEEDLE CORE BIOPSY; CELL CARCINOMA; PERCUTANEOUS BIOPSY; HELICAL CT; UNITED-STATES; TUMOR SIZE; NEOPLASMS; DIAGNOSIS; SCANS;
D O I
10.1148/radiol.2015140907
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To test the hypothesis that qualitative and quantitative features of contrast material-enhanced ultrasonography (US) can be used to differentiate benign from malignant small renal masses. Materials and Methods: This is an institutional review board approved, HIPAA-compliant prospective study with written informed consent. Patients with histologically characterized solid small renal masses, excluding lipid-rich angiomyolipomas, underwent qualitative contrast-enhanced US with a combination of three different US machines. A subgroup of patients underwent quantitative contrast-enhanced US. Patients received a bolus injection of 0.2 mL of contrast material for qualitative and quantitative evaluations and were followed for 3 minutes. Two radiologists independently reviewed video-taped qualitative contrast-enhanced US examinations and were blinded to the final diagnoses. Features that were evaluated included lesion vascularity relative to the adjacent cortex in the arterial phase, the presence of a capsule, homogeneity, the pattern of vascularity, and washout. One radiologist separately reviewed a subset of contrast-enhanced US examinations that were performed with all three machines. Parameters of a first-pass time intensity curve were calculated for quantitative analysis. The Mann-Whitney test was used for quantitative parameters, the x(2) or Fisher exact test was used for qualitative parameters, and k statistics and Fleiss methodology were used to determine interobserver and intermachine agreement. Results: The study population consisted of 91 patients (35 women and 56 men) with 94 lesions. The mean age was 62 years +/- 14 (range, 21-91). Three patients had two lesions each, which were evaluated at two different sessions. There were 26 benign small renal masses (including 18 oncocytomas, seven lipid-poor angiomyolipomas, and one hemangioblastoma) and 68 malignant masses (including 41 clear cell, 20 papillary, and seven chromophobe renal cell carcinomas [RCCs[) that were 1.1-4.0 cm in diameter (mean, 2.7 cm +/- 6 0.9). All patients underwent contrast-enhanced US on the same one machine, and 68 patients were imaged on all three machines. Vascularity was present in all lesions (n = 94) at contrast-enhanced US. Lesion hypovascularity relative to the adjacent cortex in the arterial phase was seen in only malignant lesions by both reviewers; reviewer 1 saw hypovascularity in 24 of 94 lesions (P = .0001), and reviewer 2 saw hypovascularity in 21 of 94 lesions (P =.0006), for a specificity of 100% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 84, 100). This feature had kappa values of 0.91 (95% CI: 0.82, 1.00) between the two reviewers and 0.85 (95% CI: 0.72, 0.99) between the three machines. Eighteen of 20 papillary RCCs were hypovascular. Quantitative parameters of area under the receiver operating characteristics curve, peak intensity, wash-in slope of 10%-90% and 5%-45%, and washout slope of 100%-10% and 50%-10% were significantly higher in malignant renal masses (P =.018, P = .002, P = .036, P = .016, P = .001, and P = .005, respectively) than in benign lesions. Conclusion: Excluding lipid-rich angiomyolipoma, hypovascularity-which has high interobserver and intermachine agreement-of solid small renal masses relative to the cortex in the arterial phase has 100% specificity (95% CI: 84, 100) for detecting malignancy, most often papillary RCC. (C) RSNA, 2015
引用
收藏
页码:900 / 908
页数:9
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] RANDOM-WALK TYPE MODELS FOR INDICATOR-DILUTION STUDIES - COMPARISON OF A LOCAL DENSITY RANDOM-WALK AND A 1ST PASSAGE TIMES DISTRIBUTION
    BOGAARD, JM
    JANSEN, JRC
    VONRETH, EA
    VERSPRILLE, A
    WISE, ME
    [J]. CARDIOVASCULAR RESEARCH, 1986, 20 (11) : 789 - 796
  • [2] Focal liver masses: Enhancement patterns on contrast-enhanced images - Concordance of US scans with CT scans and MR images
    Burns, Peter N.
    Wilson, Stephanie R.
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2007, 242 (01) : 162 - 174
  • [3] Rising incidence of renal cell cancer in the United States
    Chow, WH
    Devesa, SS
    Warren, JL
    Fraumeni, JF
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1999, 281 (17): : 1628 - 1631
  • [4] Fleiss J. L., 1981, STAT METHODS RATES P
  • [5] Solid renal tumors: An analysis of pathological features related to tumor size
    Frank, I
    Blute, ML
    Cheville, JC
    Lohse, CM
    Weaver, AL
    Zincke, H
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2003, 170 (06) : 2217 - 2220
  • [6] Small Renal Mass
    Gill, Inderbir S.
    Aron, Monish
    Gervais, Debra A.
    Jewett, Michael A. S.
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2010, 362 (07) : 624 - 634
  • [7] Enhancement characteristics of papillary renal neoplasms revealed on triphasic helical CT of the kidneys
    Herts, BR
    Coll, DM
    Novick, AC
    Obuchowski, N
    Linnell, G
    Wirth, SL
    Baker, ME
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2002, 178 (02) : 367 - 372
  • [8] The use of opposed-phase chemical shift MRI in the diagnosis of renal angiomyolipomas
    Israel, GM
    Hindman, N
    Hecht, E
    Krinsky, G
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2005, 184 (06) : 1868 - 1872
  • [9] Clear cell renal cell carcinoma: Contrast-enhanced ultrasound features relation to tumor size
    Jiang, Jun
    Chen, Yaqing
    Zhou, Yongchang
    Zhang, Huizhen
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2010, 73 (01) : 162 - 167
  • [10] Dynamic CT evaluation of tumor vascularity in renal cell carcinoma
    Jin, HW
    Peng, GM
    Pei, JW
    Wei, XC
    Xiu, HZ
    Yu, W
    Xiao, HZ
    Xin, QM
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2006, 186 (05) : 1423 - 1430