Drinking Bottled and Tap Water for Healthier Living in Volcanic Areas: Are All Waters the Same?

被引:0
|
作者
Linhares, Diana [1 ]
Gaspar, Diogo [2 ]
Garcia, Patricia [2 ,3 ]
Rodrigues, Armindo [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Azores, Res Inst Volcanol & Risk Assessment, IVAR, Rua Mae de Deus,Apartado 1422, P-9501801 Ponta Delgada, Portugal
[2] Univ Azores, Fac Sci & Technol, P-9501801 Ponta Delgada, Portugal
[3] Univ Azores, Azorean Biodivers Grp, Ctr Ecol Evolut & Environm Changes, cE3c, P-9501801 Ponta Delgada, Portugal
关键词
fluoride; bottled water; daily intake; risk exposure assessment; volcanic regions; fluorosis; SAO-MIGUEL; FLUORIDE; AZORES; GROUNDWATER; CHILDREN; EXPOSURE; CONTEXT; HAZARDS; ISLAND;
D O I
10.3390/w14152424
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In most volcanic areas, the population considers the use of bottled waters as a healthier and safer option. This study aimed to (i) assess the fluoride concentrations in tap and bottled water consumed on Sao Miguel Island, (ii) confirm the accuracy of the labeling of fluoride levels on bottled water, and (iii) assess the fluoride daily intake and risk exposure and discuss the possible health effects in adults and children. Fluoride concentrations were measured in tap water (49 samples) and bottled water (23 samples) with a fluoride ion-selective electrode. The fluoride concentration was above the recommended limit in tap water from Sete Cidades (1.71 mg/L), in bottled waters no 5 and 7 from category C (2.05 +/- 0.04 mg/L and 2.36 +/- 0.14 mg/L, respectively), and in bottled water no 5 from category D (1.92 +/- 0.03 mg/L). Fluoride daily intake in children reached a maximum value in gasified water no 7 (0.059 mg F/day/kg). The risk assessment evidenced that all the brands with over 1.2 mgF/L might be a concern for potential non-cancer health effects, especially in adults. The most recognized brands of gasified and gasified flavored waters represent a higher risk of exceeding fluoride daily intake when compared to tap and mineral bottled waters.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] TOTAL SELENIUM CONCENTRATION IN TAP AND BOTTLED DRINKING-WATER AND COASTAL WATERS OF GREECE
    BRATAKOS, MS
    ZARIFOPOULOS, TF
    SISKOS, PA
    IOANNOU, PV
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 1988, 76 (01) : 49 - 54
  • [2] Comparison of the mineral content of tap water and bottled waters
    Azoulay A.
    Garzon P.
    Eisenberg M.J.
    Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2001, 16 (3) : 168 - 175
  • [3] Comparison of the mineral content of tap water and bottled waters
    Azoulay, A
    Garzon, P
    Eisenberg, MJ
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2001, 16 (03) : 168 - 175
  • [4] Abundance and characteristics of microplastics in drinking water treatment plants, distribution systems, water from refill kiosks, tap waters and bottled waters
    Acarer, Seren
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 884
  • [5] Monitoring of Pollutants Content in Bottled and Tap Drinking Water in Italy
    Russo, Giacomo
    Laneri, Sonia
    Di Lorenzo, Ritamaria
    Neri, Ilaria
    Dini, Irene
    Ciampaglia, Roberto
    Grumetto, Lucia
    MOLECULES, 2022, 27 (13):
  • [6] Minerals in tap water and bottled waters and their impact on human health
    Wysowska, Ewa
    Wiewiorska, Iwona
    Kicinska, Alicja
    DESALINATION AND WATER TREATMENT, 2022, 259 : 133 - 151
  • [7] Bacteriological Quality of Bottled Drinking Water and Municipal Tap Water in Northeastern Ethiopia
    Keleb, Awoke
    Ademas, Ayechew
    Sisay, Tadesse
    Lingerew, Mistir
    Adane, Metadel
    FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2022, 10
  • [8] Drinking water quality: Comparing inorganic components in bottled water and Italian tap water
    Cidu, Rosa
    Frau, Franco
    Tore, Paolo
    JOURNAL OF FOOD COMPOSITION AND ANALYSIS, 2011, 24 (02) : 184 - 193
  • [9] Bottled Water or Tap Water? A Comparative Study of Drinking Water Choices on University Campuses
    Qian, Neng
    WATER, 2018, 10 (01):
  • [10] Urinary fluoride levels in Saudi individuals drinking tap and bottled water
    Al-Saleh, I
    Al-Doush, I
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH RESEARCH, 2000, 10 (01) : 21 - 26