Which is the most efficient candidate for the recovery of confined methane: Water, carbon dioxide or nitrogen?

被引:53
作者
Lin, Kui [1 ,2 ]
Yuan, Quanzi [1 ,2 ]
Zhao, Ya-Pu [1 ,2 ]
Cheng, Chemin [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Mech, State Key Lab Nonlinear Mech, Beijing 100190, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, 19 Yu Quan Rd, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Shale gas; Adsorption/desorption; Displacement; Molecular dynamics simulations; PORE-SIZE DISTRIBUTION; ENHANCED GAS RECOVERY; PHASE-DIAGRAM; ADSORPTION; SHALE; SIMULATION; SEQUESTRATION; STORAGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.eml.2016.05.014
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
In this paper, we explored the recovery dynamics of confined methane (CH4) with water (H2O), carbon dioxide (CO2) and nitrogen (N-2), by performing molecular dynamics simulations. Through theoretical analysis, we obtained a simple yet effective method to calculate the stress caused by adsorption/desorption. By comparing the adsorption energies and configurations of CH4, H2O, CO2 and N-2 on graphene surface, it indicated that CO2 is the best candidate in displacing CH4. The energy barriers of displacing one adsorbed CH4 molecule by CO2, H2O and N-2 were found to depend on the displacement angle, and that vertical displacement costs the lowest energy. The energy barriers of displacing one molecule in an adsorbed CH4 layer under different conditions were also obtained. Furthermore, displacement efficiencies of the adsorbed CH4 confined in the carbon nanotube were compared. The displacement efficiency is in the order of CO2 > N-2 > H2O. Our study may help to reveal the underlying mechanisms of adsorption/desorption phenomena, understand the shale gas recovery from the atomic level and provide new idea in shale gas exploitation technology. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:127 / 138
页数:12
相关论文
共 45 条
[11]   STRUCTURE AND ENERGETICS OF LIGAND-BINDING TO PROTEINS - ESCHERICHIA-COLI DIHYDROFOLATE REDUCTASE TRIMETHOPRIM, A DRUG-RECEPTOR SYSTEM [J].
DAUBEROSGUTHORPE, P ;
ROBERTS, VA ;
OSGUTHORPE, DJ ;
WOLFF, J ;
GENEST, M ;
HAGLER, AT .
PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND GENETICS, 1988, 4 (01) :31-47
[12]   Spontaneous Imbibition of Brine and Oil in Gas Shales: Effect of Water Adsorption and Resulting Microfractures [J].
Dehghanpour, H. ;
Lan, Q. ;
Saeed, Y. ;
Fei, H. ;
Qi, Z. .
ENERGY & FUELS, 2013, 27 (06) :3039-3049
[13]   Phase Diagram of H2O: Thermodynamic Functions of the Phase Transitions of High-Pressure Ices [J].
Dunaeva, A. N. ;
Antsyshkin, D. V. ;
Kuskov, O. L. .
SOLAR SYSTEM RESEARCH, 2010, 44 (03) :202-222
[14]   Slippage and viscosity predictions in carbon micropores and their influence on CO2 and CH4 transport [J].
Firouzi, Mahnaz ;
Wilcox, Jennifer .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 2013, 138 (06)
[15]   NATURE OF POROSITY IN AMERICAN COALS [J].
GAN, H ;
WALKER, PL ;
NANDI, SP .
FUEL, 1972, 51 (04) :272-&
[16]   Impact of rock fabric on water imbibition and salt diffusion in gas shales [J].
Ghanbari, Ebrahim ;
Dehghanpour, Hassan .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COAL GEOLOGY, 2015, 138 :55-67
[17]   Potential for enhanced gas recovery and CO2 storage in the Marcellus Shale in the Eastern United States [J].
Godec, Michael ;
Koperna, George ;
Petrusak, Robin ;
Oudinot, Anne .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COAL GEOLOGY, 2013, 118 :95-104
[18]   Opportunities for Using Anthropogenic CO2 for Enhanced Oil Recovery and CO2 Storage [J].
Godec, Michael L. ;
Kuuskraa, Vello A. ;
Dipietro, Phil .
ENERGY & FUELS, 2013, 27 (08) :4183-4189
[19]   Experimental investigation of matrix permeability of gas shales [J].
Heller, Rob ;
Vermylen, John ;
Zoback, Mark .
AAPG BULLETIN, 2014, 98 (05) :975-995
[20]   Adsorption of methane and carbon dioxide on gas shale and pure mineral samples [J].
Heller, Robert ;
Zoback, Mark .
JOURNAL OF UNCONVENTIONAL OIL AND GAS RESOURCES, 2014, 8 (0C) :14-24