Which is the most efficient candidate for the recovery of confined methane: Water, carbon dioxide or nitrogen?

被引:53
作者
Lin, Kui [1 ,2 ]
Yuan, Quanzi [1 ,2 ]
Zhao, Ya-Pu [1 ,2 ]
Cheng, Chemin [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Mech, State Key Lab Nonlinear Mech, Beijing 100190, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, 19 Yu Quan Rd, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Shale gas; Adsorption/desorption; Displacement; Molecular dynamics simulations; PORE-SIZE DISTRIBUTION; ENHANCED GAS RECOVERY; PHASE-DIAGRAM; ADSORPTION; SHALE; SIMULATION; SEQUESTRATION; STORAGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.eml.2016.05.014
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
In this paper, we explored the recovery dynamics of confined methane (CH4) with water (H2O), carbon dioxide (CO2) and nitrogen (N-2), by performing molecular dynamics simulations. Through theoretical analysis, we obtained a simple yet effective method to calculate the stress caused by adsorption/desorption. By comparing the adsorption energies and configurations of CH4, H2O, CO2 and N-2 on graphene surface, it indicated that CO2 is the best candidate in displacing CH4. The energy barriers of displacing one adsorbed CH4 molecule by CO2, H2O and N-2 were found to depend on the displacement angle, and that vertical displacement costs the lowest energy. The energy barriers of displacing one molecule in an adsorbed CH4 layer under different conditions were also obtained. Furthermore, displacement efficiencies of the adsorbed CH4 confined in the carbon nanotube were compared. The displacement efficiency is in the order of CO2 > N-2 > H2O. Our study may help to reveal the underlying mechanisms of adsorption/desorption phenomena, understand the shale gas recovery from the atomic level and provide new idea in shale gas exploitation technology. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:127 / 138
页数:12
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]   Comparisons of pore size distribution: A case from the Western Australian gas shale formations [J].
Al Hinai, Adnan ;
Rezaee, Reza ;
Esteban, Lionel ;
Labani, Mehdi .
JOURNAL OF UNCONVENTIONAL OIL AND GAS RESOURCES, 2014, 8 (0C) :1-13
[2]   Comparative Study of Methane Adsorption on Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes [J].
Albesa, Alberto G. ;
Fertitta, Edgardo A. ;
Vicente, Jose L. .
LANGMUIR, 2010, 26 (02) :786-795
[3]  
[Anonymous], SPE UNC GAS C SOC PE
[4]   Thermodynamics and structure of hydrogen, methane, argon, oxygen, and carbon dioxide adsorbed on single-wall carbon nanotube bundles [J].
Bienfait, M ;
Zeppenfeld, P ;
Dupont-Pavlovsky, N ;
Muris, M ;
Johnson, MR ;
Wilson, T ;
DePies, M ;
Vilches, OE .
PHYSICAL REVIEW B, 2004, 70 (03) :035410-1
[5]   PHASE-DIAGRAM OF N2 DETERMINED BY RAMAN-SPECTROSCOPY FROM 15 TO 300 K AT PRESSURES TO 52 GPA [J].
BUCHSBAUM, S ;
MILLS, RL ;
SCHIFERL, D .
JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY, 1984, 88 (12) :2522-2525
[6]   Life-Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Shale Gas, Natural Gas, Coal, and Petroleum [J].
Burnham, Andrew ;
Han, Jeongwoo ;
Clark, Corrie E. ;
Wang, Michael ;
Dunn, Jennifer B. ;
Palou-Rivera, Ignasi .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 46 (02) :619-627
[7]   Methane and CO2 sorption and desorption measurements on dry Argonne premium coals:: pure components and mixtures [J].
Busch, A ;
Gensterblum, Y ;
Krooss, BM .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COAL GEOLOGY, 2003, 55 (2-4) :205-224
[8]   High-pressure adsorption of gases on shales: Measurements and modeling [J].
Chareonsuppanimit, Pongtorn ;
Mohammad, Sayeed A. ;
Robinson, Robert L., Jr. ;
Gasem, Khaled A. M. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COAL GEOLOGY, 2012, 95 :34-46
[9]   INFLUENCE OF PORE GEOMETRY ON THE DESIGN OF MICROPOROUS MATERIALS FOR METHANE STORAGE [J].
CRACKNELL, RF ;
GORDON, P ;
GUBBINS, KE .
JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY, 1993, 97 (02) :494-499
[10]   Fractured shale-gas systems [J].
Curtis, JB .
AAPG BULLETIN, 2002, 86 (11) :1921-1938