Chinese patients' preference for pharmaceutical treatments of osteoporosis: a discrete choice experiment

被引:9
作者
Si, Lei [1 ,2 ]
Tu, Liudan [3 ]
Xie, Ya [3 ]
Palmer, Andrew J. [4 ,5 ]
Gu, Yuanyuan [6 ,7 ]
Zheng, Xuqi [3 ]
Li, Jiamin [3 ]
Lv, Qing [3 ]
Qi, Jun [3 ]
Lin, Zhiming [3 ]
Chen, Mingsheng [8 ]
Gu, Jieruo [3 ]
Hiligsmann, Mickael [9 ]
机构
[1] UNSW Sydney, George Inst Global Hlth, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] UNSW Sydney, UNSW Med, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Affiliated Hosp 3, Dept Rheumatol, 600 Tianhe Rd, Guangzhou 510630, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Tasmania, Menzies Inst Med Res, Hobart, Tas, Australia
[5] Univ Melbourne, Sch Populat & Global Hlth, Ctr Hlth Policy, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[6] Macquarie Univ, Ctr Hlth Econ, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia
[7] Univ York, Dept Econ & Related Studies, York YO10 5NG, N Yorkshire, England
[8] Nanjing Med Univ, Sch Hlth Policy & Management, Nanjing 211166, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[9] Maastricht Univ, CAPHRI Care & Publ Hlth Res Inst, Dept Hlth Serv Res, Maastricht, Netherlands
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Discrete choice experiment; Pharmaceutical treatment; Osteoporosis; Patient preferences; Chinese; POSTMENOPAUSAL WOMEN; DRUG-TREATMENT; HEALTH-CARE; PERSISTENCE; ADHERENCE; FRACTURES; RISK;
D O I
10.1007/s11657-019-0624-z
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
While adherence to osteoporosis treatment is low, patients' preference for osteoporosis treatment is unknown in Chinese patients. Chinese patients are willing to receive treatments with higher clinical efficacy and lower out-of-pocket cost. In addition, annual intravenous infusion and 6-month subcutaneous injection are preferred over weekly oral tablets.PurposeThis study was performed to elicit Chinese patients' preferences for osteoporosis medication treatment and to investigate the heterogeneities of the preferences in subgroups.MethodsA discrete choice experiment comprising 15 choice sets with 4 important attributes was conducted in a Chinese population at risk of osteoporotic fracture. The four attributes were treatment efficacy in reducing the risk of fracture, out-of-pocket cost per year, adverse effects of treatment, and mode of administration. The patients were asked to choose between two hypothetical treatments; they could also choose no treatment. Mixed logit models were used, and any observed heterogeneity in the patients' preferences was further assessed in subgroup analyses.ResultsIn total, 267 patients were analysed. On average, the patients preferred to receive treatment rather than no treatment. The patients preferred treatment with higher efficacy in preventing fracture and lower out-of-pocket cost. The least preferred adverse effect of medication was gastrointestinal disorders, followed by flu-like symptoms and finally skin reactions. The most preferred mode of administration was annual intravenous infusion, followed by 6-month subcutaneous injection, a weekly oral tablet, and daily nasal spray; daily oral tablets ranked as the least preferred mode of administration. The differences in the patients' preferences among all attributes were statistically significant (p<0.05). Patients' age was found to contribute to the observed preference heterogeneity in most of the included attributes.ConclusionsThis study revealed Chinese patients' preferences for osteoporosis treatments. Annual intravenous infusion and 6-month subcutaneous injection were significantly preferred over weekly oral tablets in this Chinese population.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [1] Amaya-Amaya M, 2008, ECON NON-MARK GOOD, V11, P13
  • [2] BLACK DM, 2007, NEW ENGL J MED, V356, P1809, DOI [DOI 10.1056/NEJMOA067312, 10.1056/NEJMoa067312]
  • [3] Breckenridge A., 2011, Drug Discov Today Technol, V8, pe11, DOI [DOI 10.1016/j.ddtec.2011.03.002, 10.1016/j.ddtec.2011.03, DOI 10.1016/J.DDTEC.2011.03]
  • [4] Cost-effectiveness of raloxifene in the treatment of osteoporosis in Chinese postmenopausal women: impact of medication persistence and adherence
    Chen, Mingsheng
    Si, Lei
    Winzenberg, Tania M.
    Gu, Jieruo
    Jiang, Qicheng
    Palmer, Andrew J.
    [J]. PATIENT PREFERENCE AND ADHERENCE, 2016, 10 : 415 - 423
  • [5] Who Pays for Health Care in China? The Case of Heilongjiang Province
    Chen, Mingsheng
    Zhao, Yuxin
    Si, Lei
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (10):
  • [6] Differences in Adherence to Osteoporosis Regimens: A 2-Year Analysis of a Population Treated Under Specific Guidelines
    Cheng, Tien-Tsai
    Yu, Shan-Fu
    Hsu, Chung-Yuan
    Chen, Sung-Hsiung
    Su, Ben Yu-Jih
    Yang, Tsong-Shing
    [J]. CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2013, 35 (07) : 1005 - 1015
  • [7] Understanding different beliefs held by adherers, unintentional nonadherers, and intentional nonadherers: Application of the Necessity-Concerns Frarnework
    Clifford, Sarah
    Barber, Nick
    Horne, Rob
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC RESEARCH, 2008, 64 (01) : 41 - 46
  • [8] Relationship Between Compliance and Persistence with Osteoporosis Medications and Fracture Risk in Primary Health Care in France: A Retrospective Case-Control Analysis
    Cotte, Francois-Emery
    Mercier, Florence
    De Pouvourville, Gerard
    [J]. CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2008, 30 (12) : 2410 - 2422
  • [9] Meta-analysis of calcitonin for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis
    Cranney, A
    Tugwell, P
    Zytaruk, N
    Robinson, V
    Weaver, B
    Shea, B
    Wells, G
    Adachi, J
    Waldegger, L
    Guyatt, G
    [J]. ENDOCRINE REVIEWS, 2002, 23 (04) : 540 - 551
  • [10] Denosumab for Prevention of Fractures in Postmenopausal Women with Osteoporosis
    Cummings, Steven R.
    San Martin, Javier
    McClung, Michael R.
    Siris, Ethel S.
    Eastell, Richard
    Reid, Ian R.
    Delmas, Pierre
    Zoog, Holly B.
    Austin, Matt
    Wang, Andrea
    Kutilek, Stepan
    Adami, Silvano
    Zanchetta, Jose
    Libanati, Cesar
    Siddhanti, Suresh
    Christiansen, Claus
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2009, 361 (08) : 756 - 765