Endoscopic balloon dilatation in primary obstructive megaureter: Long-term results

被引:20
作者
Casal Beloy, I [1 ]
Somoza Argibay, I [1 ]
Garcia Gonzalez, M. [1 ]
Garcia Novoa, M. A. [1 ]
Miguez Fortes, L. M. [1 ]
Dargallo Carbonell, T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Childrens Hosp A Coruna, Dept Pediat Surg, Pediat Urol Div, As Xubias 84, La Coruna, Spain
关键词
Primary obstructive megaureter; Endoscopic balloon dilation; Long-term; Hydroureteronephrosis; PRIMARY NONREFLUXING MEGAURETER; URETEROVESICAL JUNCTION; URETERAL REIMPLANTATION; MANAGEMENT; DILATION; CHILDREN; EXPERIENCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jpurol.2017.10.016
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Background Open neoureterocystostomy is the traditional surgical treatment for primary obstructive megaureter (POM). Endoscopic balloon dilation is a new minimally invasive alternative. It has been shown to be a safe and effective endoscopic procedure over shortterm follow-up; however, few studies have shown its long-term efficacy. Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term results and complications of balloon dilation for the treatment of primary obstructive megaureter in infants. Materials and method A retrospective review was performed of patients with primary obstructive megaureter treated with balloon dilation. The diagnosis was made through ultrasonography, diuretic isotopic renogram, and voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG). The indications for surgery were: worsening hydronephrosis, renal function impairment, and recurrent urinary tract infections (UTI). All patients were followed 3 months after the endoscopic procedure with ultrasonography and MAG-3 renogram, and 6 months after surgery with VCUG and ultrasonography. Annual ultrasound and clinical follow-up were performed until present time. Results Seven boys and six girls were treated (median age 9 months, range 2-24). Ten patients had a prenatal diagnosis of hydronephrosis, and the diagnoses was made after UTI in three patients. No intraoperative complications were observed. One double-J stent was replaced after endoscopic procedure for malpositioning, and four patients developed UTIs after surgery. All patients had non-obstructive MAG-3 diuretic renogram 6 months after surgery. The mean washout on the renogram and the ultrasound pelvic diameter showed pre-operative and postoperative statistical differences (Summary Table). All patients maintained their results without recurrence or any other complications in the long-term follow-up. The median follow-up was 10.3 years (range 4.7-12.2). Discusion In 2014, Aparicio et al. first described balloon dilation being used as a definitive treatment for primary obstructive megaureter in infants. Bujons et al. also presented 20 cases with a mean follow-up of 6.9 years. The current study is the largest to date, with a median follow-up of 10.2 years. It demonstrated the value of balloon dilation as a definitive treatment for POM. Despite these results, it was difficult to establish endoscopic balloon dilation as a definitive treatment for POM, due to the absence of longterm studies like the current one. Conclusion Balloon dilation can be a safe and effective endoscopic procedure for the treatment of primary obstructive megaureter in infants, and has shown good outcomes in long-term follow-up. More studies are needed to demonstrate these results.
引用
收藏
页码:167.e1 / 167.e5
页数:5
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   Primary obstructive megaureter: Initial experience with endoscopic dilatation [J].
Angerri, Oriol ;
Caffaratti, Jorge ;
Maria Garat, Jose ;
Villavicencio, Humberto .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2007, 21 (09) :999-1004
[2]  
Angulo J M, 1998, Cir Pediatr, V11, P15
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2015, J PEDIATR UROL
[4]   Primary Obstructive Megaureter in Infants: Our Experience with Endoscopic Balloon Dilation and Cutting Balloon Ureterotomy [J].
Capozza, Nicola ;
Torino, Giovanni ;
Nappo, Simona ;
Collura, Giuseppe ;
Mele, Ermelinda .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2015, 29 (01) :1-5
[5]   Double-J stent insertion across vesicoureteral junction - Is it a valuable initial approach in neonates and infants with severe primary nonrefluxing megaureter? [J].
Castagnetti, Marco ;
Cimador, Marcello ;
Sergio, Maria ;
De Grazia, Enrico .
UROLOGY, 2006, 68 (04) :870-875
[6]   Endoscopic Management and the Role of Double Stenting for Primary Obstructive Megaureters [J].
Christman, Matthew S. ;
Kasturi, Sanjay ;
Lambert, Sarah M. ;
Kovell, R. Caleb ;
Casale, Pasquale .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 187 (03) :1018-1022
[7]   Results of tapered ureteral reimplantation for primary megaureter: Extravesical versus intravesical approach [J].
DeFoor, W ;
Minevich, E ;
Reddy, P ;
Polsky, E ;
Mcgregor, A ;
Wacksman, J ;
Sheldon, C .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2004, 172 (04) :1640-1643
[8]   Long-Term Followup of Primary Nonrefluxing Megaureter [J].
Di Renzo, Dacia ;
Aguiar, Liza ;
Cascini, Valentina ;
Di Nicola, Marta ;
McCarten, Kathleen M. ;
Ellsworth, Pamela I. ;
Chiesa, Pierluigi Lelli ;
Caldamone, Anthony A. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 190 (03) :1021-1026
[9]   The utilization of stents in the management of primary obstructive megaureters requiring intervention before 1 year of age [J].
Farrugia, Marie-Klaire ;
Steinbrecher, Henrik A. ;
Malone, Padraig S. .
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC UROLOGY, 2011, 7 (02) :198-202
[10]   Use of high-pressure balloon dilatation of the ureterovesical junction instead of ureteral reimplantation to treat primary obstructive megaureter: Is it justified? [J].
Garcia-Aparicio, L. ;
Blazquez-Gomez, E. ;
Martin, O. ;
Palazon, P. ;
Manzanares, A. ;
Garcia-Smith, N. ;
Bejarano, M. ;
de Haro, I. ;
Ribo, J. M. .
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC UROLOGY, 2013, 9 (06) :1229-1233