A comparison of remifentanil and morphine sulfate for acute postoperative analgesia after total intravenous anesthesia with remifentanil and propofol

被引:90
作者
Yarmush, J
DAngelo, R
Kirkhart, B
OLeary, C
Pitts, MC
Graf, G
Sebel, P
Watkins, WD
Miguel, R
Streisand, J
Maysick, LK
Vujic, D
机构
[1] WAKE FOREST UNIV,BOWMAN GRAY SCH MED,SECT OBSTET ANESTHESIA,WINSTON SALEM,NC
[2] SUNY HLTH SCI CTR,DEPT ANESTHESIOL,SYRACUSE,NY 13210
[3] EMORY UNIV,DEPT ANESTHESIOL,ATLANTA,GA 30322
[4] UNIV CALIF LOS ANGELES,DEPT ANESTHESIOL,LOS ANGELES,CA 90024
[5] UNIV PITTSBURGH,MED CTR,DEPT ANESTHESIOL,PITTSBURGH,PA 15260
[6] UNIV S FLORIDA,DEPT ANESTHESIOL,TAMPA,FL 33620
[7] UNIV UTAH,DEPT ANESTHESIOL,SALT LAKE CITY,UT 84112
[8] MONTEFIORE MED CTR,DEPT ANESTHESIOL,BRONX,NY 10467
关键词
analgesics; opioids; remifentanil; morphine; pain; postoperative; prevention; control; pain management; double-blind method;
D O I
10.1097/00000542-199708000-00009
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background. The transition from remifentanil intraoperative anesthesia to postoperative analgesia must be planned carefully due to the short duration of action (3-10 min) of remifentanil hydrochloride, a potent, esterase-metabolized mu- opioid agonist. This study compared the efficacy and safety of transition regimens using remifentanil or morphine sulfate for immediate postoperative pain relief in patients who had surgery under general anesthesia with remifentanil/propofol. Methods: One hundred fifty patients who had received open-label remifentanil and propofol for intraoperative anesthesia participated in this multicenter, double-blind, double-dummy study and were randomly assigned to either the remifentanil (R) group or the morphine sulfate (M) group. Twenty minutes before the anticipated end of surgery, the propofol infusion was decreased by 50%, and patients received either a placebo bolus (R group) or a bolus of 0.15 mg/kg morphine (M group). At the end of surgery, the propofol and remifentanil maintenance infusions were discontinued and the analgesic infusion was started: either 0.1 mu g.kg(-1).min(-1) remifentanil (R group) or placebo analgesic infusion (M group). During the 25 min after tracheal extubation, remifentanil titrations in increments of 0.025 mu g.kg(-1).min(-1) and placebo boluses (R group), or 2 mg intravenous morphine boluses and placebo rate increases (M group) were administered as necessary at 5-min intervals to control pain. Patients received the 0.075 mg/kg intravenous morphine bolus (R group) or placebo (hi group) at 25 and 30 min after extubation, and the analgesic infusion was discontinued at 35 min. From 35 to 65 minutes after extubation, both groups received 2-6 mg open-label morphine analgesia every 5 min as needed. Results: Successful analgesia, defined as no or mild pain with adequate respiration (respiratory rate [RR] greater than or equal to 8 breaths/ min and pulse oximetry greater than or equal to 90%), was achieved in more patients in the R group than in the M group (58% vs. 33%, respectively) at 25 min after extubation (P < 0.05). The median remifentanil rate for successful analgesia was 0.125 mu g.kg(-1).min(-1) (range, 0.05-0.23 mu g.kg(-1).min(-1)), and the median number of 2-mg morphine boluses used was 2 (range, 0-5 boluses). At 35 min after extubation, greater than or equal to 74% of patients in both groups experienced moderate to severe pain. Median recovery times from the end of surgery were similar between groups. Transient respiratory depression, apnea, or both were the most frequent adverse events (14% for the R group vs. 6% for the M group; P > 0.05). Conclusions: Remifentanil provided safe and effective postoperative analgesia when administered at a final rate of 0.05-0.23 mu g.kg(-1).min(-1) in the immediate postextubation period. Remifentanil provided more effective postoperative analgesia than did intraoperative treatment with morphine (0.15 mg/kg) followed by morphine boluses (less than or equal to five 2-mg boluses). The effects of remifentanil dissipated rapidly after ending the infusion, and alternate analgesia was required. Further studies are underway to define transition regimens that will improve postoperative analgesia in patients receiving anesthesia with remifentanil.
引用
收藏
页码:235 / 243
页数:9
相关论文
共 10 条
  • [1] ALDRETE JA, 1970, ANESTH ANAL CURR RES, V49, P924
  • [2] A multicenter evaluation of remifentanil for early postoperative analgesia
    Bowdle, TA
    Camporesi, EM
    Maysick, L
    Hogue, CW
    Miguel, RV
    Pitts, M
    Streisand, JB
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1996, 83 (06) : 1292 - 1297
  • [3] THE PHARMACOKINETICS OF THE NEW SHORT-ACTING OPIOID REMIFENTANIL (GI87084B) IN HEALTHY ADULT MALE-VOLUNTEERS
    EGAN, TD
    LEMMENS, HJM
    FISET, P
    HERMANN, DJ
    MUIR, KT
    STANSKI, DR
    SHAFER, SL
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1993, 79 (05) : 881 - 892
  • [4] DESIGN, SYNTHESIS, AND PHARMACOLOGICAL EVALUATION OF ULTRASHORT-ACTING TO LONG-ACTING OPIOID ANALGESICS
    FELDMAN, PL
    JAMES, MK
    BRACKEEN, MF
    BILOTTA, JM
    SCHUSTER, SV
    LAHEY, AP
    LUTZ, MW
    JOHNSON, MR
    LEIGHTON, HJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 1991, 34 (07) : 2202 - 2208
  • [5] GLASS PSA, 1993, ANESTH ANALG, V77, P1031
  • [6] A multicenter evaluation of total intravenous anesthesia with remifentanil and propofol for elective inpatient surgery
    Hogue, CW
    Bowdle, TA
    OLeary, C
    Duncalf, D
    Miguel, R
    Pitts, M
    Streisand, J
    Kirvassilis, G
    Jamerson, B
    McNeal, S
    Batenhorst, R
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1996, 83 (02) : 279 - 285
  • [7] JAMES MK, 1991, J PHARMACOL EXP THER, V259, P712
  • [8] James MK, 1994, EXPERT OPIN INV DRUG, V3, P331
  • [9] MEASURED CONTEXT-SENSITIVE HALF-TIMES OF REMIFENTANIL AND ALFENTANIL
    KAPILA, A
    GLASS, PSA
    JACOBS, JR
    MUIR, KT
    HERMANN, DJ
    SHIRAISHI, M
    HOWELL, S
    SMITH, RL
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1995, 83 (05) : 968 - 975
  • [10] PHARMACOKINETICS OF REMIFENTANIL (GI87084B) AND ITS MAJOR METABOLITE (GI90291) IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING ELECTIVE INPATIENT SURGERY
    WESTMORELAND, CL
    HOKE, JF
    SEBEL, PS
    HUG, CC
    MUIR, KT
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1993, 79 (05) : 893 - 903