Photomask dimensional metrology in the scanning electron microscope, part I:: Has anything really changed

被引:10
作者
Postek, MT [1 ]
Vladár, AE
Bennett, MH
机构
[1] Natl Inst Stand & Technol, Gaithersburg, MD 20899 USA
[2] Int SEMATECH, Austin, TX 78741 USA
[3] Texas Instruments Inc, Austin, TX 78741 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF MICROLITHOGRAPHY MICROFABRICATION AND MICROSYSTEMS | 2004年 / 3卷 / 02期
关键词
metrology; scanning electron microscope; charging; critical dimension; photomask; traceability; accuracy;
D O I
10.1117/1.1668271
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Photomask dimensional metrology in the scanning electron microscope has not evolved as rapidly as the metrology of resists and integrated circuit features on wafers. This has been due partly to the 4x (or 5x) reduction in optical steppers and scanners used in the lithography process, and partly for the lesser need to account for the real three dimensionality of the mask structures. So, where photomasks are concerned, many of the issues challenging wafer dimensional metrology at 1x are reduced by a factor of 4 or 5 and thus could be temporarily swept aside. This is rapidly changing with the introduction of advanced masks with optical proximity correction and phase shifting features used in 100 nm and smaller circuit generations. Fortunately, photomask metrology generally benefits from the advances made for wafer metrology, but there are still unique issues to be solved in this form of dimensional metrology. It is likely that no single metrology method or tool will ever provide all necessary answers. As with other types of metrology, resolution, sensitivity and linearity in three-dimensional measurements of the shape of the lines and phase shifting features in general (width, height and wall angles) and departure from the desired shape (surface and edge roughness, etc.) are the key parameters. Different methods and tools differ in their capability to collect average and localized signals at acceptable speed, but in any case, application of thorough knowledge of the physics of the given metrology is essential to extract the information needed. This paper will discuss the precision, accuracy and traceability in SEM metrology of photomasks. Current and possible new techniques utilized in the measurements of photomasks including suppression of charge and highly accurate modeling for electron beam metrology will also be explored to answer the question, Has anything really changed? (C) 2004 Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers.
引用
收藏
页码:212 / 223
页数:12
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 4032012 WST
[2]  
*BIPM, 1983, 17 C GEN POIDS MES R
[3]  
BULLIS WM, 1982, VLSI ELECTRONICS MIC, V3, P301
[4]  
*C RIV ASS, 1981, 493 CRA
[5]  
CROARKIN MC, 1982, 1164 NIST NBS
[6]  
DANILATOS GD, 1988, ADV ELECTRON EL PHYS, V71, P109
[7]   INTRODUCTION TO THE ESEM INSTRUMENT [J].
DANILATOS, GD .
MICROSCOPY RESEARCH AND TECHNIQUE, 1993, 25 (5-6) :354-361
[8]   An investigation of the effects of charging in SEM based CD metrology [J].
Davidson, M ;
Sullivan, NT .
METROLOGY, INSPECTION, AND PROCESS CONTROL FOR MICROLITHOGRAPHY XI, 1997, 3050 :226-242
[9]   An inverse scattering approach to SEM line width measurements [J].
Davidson, MP ;
Vladár, AE .
METROLOGY, INSPECTION, AND PROCESS CONTROL FOR MICROLITHOGRAPHY XIII, PTS 1 AND 2, 1999, 3677 :640-649
[10]  
DIXSON R, IN PRESS P SPIE, V4689