What Visual Targets Are Viewed by Users With a Handheld Mobile Magnifier App

被引:7
作者
Luo, Gang [1 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Med Sch, Schepens Eye Res Inst, Massachusetts Eye & Ear, Dept Ophthalmol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
来源
TRANSLATIONAL VISION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY | 2021年 / 10卷 / 03期
关键词
smartphone; low vision; visual demands;
D O I
10.1167/tvst.10.3.16
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: Mobile video magnifier apps are used by many visually impaired people for seeing details that are beyond their visual capacity. Understanding the common types of visual targets will be importantly informative for low-vision research and assistive technology development. This study addressed this question through analysis of images captured by magnifier app users pursuing their daily activities. Methods: An iOS magnifier app, free to the public, was used to capture and upload images to the Azure Computer Vision cloud service for object recognition. Returned object tag results for each image were uploaded to the Umeng analytics server for aggregated tallies. Consolidated data from 24,295 users across 1 month were analyzed. More than 1300 types of object tags found in 152,819 images were grouped into 11 categories. The data collection and analyses were conducted separately for users who toggled on or off iOS vision-accessibility features. Results: For accessibility and nonaccessibility user groups, 60% to 70% of objects were nontextual, such as an indoor scene, human, or art. More than 40% of the images contained more than one object category. Accessibility users viewed textual objects more frequently than nonaccessibility users (41.1% vs. 29.8%), but overall, the probability ranking of categories was not significantly different between the two groups. Conclusions: Nontextual objects make up a major portion of visual needs of magnifier users across a wide range of vision loss. Translational Relevance: Low-vision research and vision assistance technology development should address the need for nontextual object viewing.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [11] Massof RW, 2003, INVEST OPHTHALMOL VI, V44, P1284
  • [12] Assessment of the Apple iPad as a low-vision reading aid
    Morrice, E.
    Johnson, A. P.
    Marinier, J-A
    Wittich, W.
    [J]. EYE, 2017, 31 (06) : 865 - 871
  • [13] Reading with a head-mounted video magnifier
    Ortiz, A
    Chung, STL
    Legge, GE
    Jobling, JT
    [J]. OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 1999, 76 (11) : 755 - 763
  • [14] Timed instrumental activities of daily living tasks: Relationship to visual function in older adults
    Owsley, C
    McGwin, G
    Sloane, ME
    Stalvey, BT
    Wells, J
    [J]. OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 2001, 78 (05) : 350 - 359
  • [15] A Mobile Application for Keyword Search in Real World Scenes
    Pundlik, Shrinivas
    Singh, Anikait
    Baghel, Gautam
    Baliutaviciute, Vilte
    Luo, Gang
    [J]. IEEE JOURNAL OF TRANSLATIONAL ENGINEERING IN HEALTH AND MEDICINE, 2019, 7
  • [16] Satgunam P, 2018, OPTOM VIS SCI, V95, P452
  • [17] Effects of Contour Enhancement on Low-Vision Preference and Visual Search
    Satgunam, PremNandhini
    Woods, Russell L.
    Luo, Gang
    Bronstad, P. Matthew
    Reynolds, Zachary
    Ramachandra, Chaithanya
    Mel, Bartlett W.
    Peli, Eli
    [J]. OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 2012, 89 (09) : E1364 - E1373
  • [18] Everyday visual demands of people with low vision: A mixed methods real-life recording study
    Starke, Sandra D.
    Golubova, Eugenie
    Crossland, Michael D.
    Wolffsohn, James S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VISION, 2020, 20 (09): : 1 - 16
  • [19] How does age-related macular degeneration affect real-world visual ability and quality of life? A systematic review
    Taylor, Deanna J.
    Hobby, Angharad E.
    Binns, Alison M.
    Crabb, David P.
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2016, 6 (12):
  • [20] The value of Tablets as reading aids for individuals with central visual field loss: an evaluation of eccentric reading with static and scrolling text
    Walker, Robin
    Bryan, Lauren
    Harvey, Hannah
    Riazi, Afsane
    Anderson, Stephen J.
    [J]. OPHTHALMIC AND PHYSIOLOGICAL OPTICS, 2016, 36 (04) : 459 - 464