Analytical Review of Life-Cycle Environmental Impacts of Carbon Capture and Utilization Technologies

被引:80
作者
Garcia-Garcia, Guillermo [1 ]
Fernandez, Marta Cruz [2 ]
Armstrong, Katy [1 ]
Woolass, Steven [2 ]
Styring, Peter [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sheffield, UK Ctr CO2 Utilizat, Dept Chem & Biol Engn, Sir Robert Hadfield Bldg, Sheffield S1 3JD, S Yorkshire, England
[2] Tata Steel, Unit 2, Meadowhall Business Pk,Carbrook Hall Rd, Sheffield S9 2EQ, S Yorkshire, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
carbon capture and utilization; environmental analysis; life-cycle analysis; sustainable chemistry; renewable resources; POWER-TO-GAS; CO2; UTILIZATION; DIMETHYL ETHER; METHANOL PRODUCTION; TECHNOECONOMIC ASSESSMENT; DIOXIDE UTILIZATION; RENEWABLE HYDROGEN; ALTERNATIVE FUELS; ENERGY SYSTEM; CONVERSION;
D O I
10.1002/cssc.202002126
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
Carbon capture and utilization (CCU) has been proposed as a sustainable alternative to produce valuable chemicals by reducing the global warming impact and depletion of fossil resources. To guarantee that CCU processes have environmental advantages over conventional production processes, thorough and systematic environmental impact analyses must be performed. Life-Cycle Assessment (LCA) is a robust methodology that can be used to fulfil this aim. In this context, this article aims to review the life-cycle environmental impacts of several CCU processes, focusing on the production of methanol, methane, dimethyl ether, dimethyl carbonate, propane and propene. A systematic literature review is used to collect relevant published evidence of the environmental impacts and potential benefits. An analysis of such information shows that CCU generally provides a reduction of environmental impacts, notably global warming/climate change, compared to conventional manufacturing processes of the same product. To achieve such environmental improvements, renewable energy must be used, particularly to produce hydrogen from water electrolysis. Importantly, different methodological choices are identified that are being used in the LCA studies, making results not comparable. There is a clear need to harmonize LCA methods for the analyses of CCU systems, and more importantly, to document and justify such methodological choices in the LCA report.
引用
收藏
页码:995 / 1015
页数:21
相关论文
共 140 条
[1]   On the climate change mitigation potential of CO2 conversion to fuels [J].
Abanades, J. Carlos ;
Rubin, Edward S. ;
Mazzotti, Marco ;
Herzog, Howard J. .
ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2017, 10 (12) :2491-2499
[2]   Towards the electrochemical conversion of carbon dioxide into methanol [J].
Albo, J. ;
Alvarez-Guerra, M. ;
Castano, P. ;
Irabien, A. .
GREEN CHEMISTRY, 2015, 17 (04) :2304-2324
[3]   Methanol production via direct carbon dioxide hydrogenation using hydrogen from photocatalytic water splitting: Process development and techno-economic analysis [J].
Alsayegh, Sari ;
Johnson, J. R. ;
Ohs, Burkhard ;
Wessling, Matthias .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 208 :1446-1458
[4]   CO2 utilization: an enabling element to move to a resource- and energy-efficient chemical and fuel production [J].
Ampelli, Claudio ;
Perathoner, Siglinda ;
Centi, Gabriele .
PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY A-MATHEMATICAL PHYSICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES, 2015, 373 (2037)
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2018, Global Warming of 1.5C
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2015, FCCCCP2015L9REV1
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2006, ISO 14040 2006 ENV M, DOI DOI 10.1002/JTR
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2020, OBERON FUELS
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2019, PROP PROD MAN PROC I
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2011, KOGAS DME ACTIVITIES