Scaffolding design thinking in online STEM preservice teacher training

被引:53
作者
Wu, Bian [1 ,2 ]
Hu, Yiling [1 ]
Wang, Minhong [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] East China Normal Univ, Dept Educ Informat Technol, 3663 North Zhongshan Rd, Shanghai 200062, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[3] Univ Hong Kong, Fac Educ, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[4] East China Normal Univ, Shanghai, Peoples R China
关键词
INQUIRY;
D O I
10.1111/bjet.12873
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Despite growing awareness of the importance of incorporating integrated science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) learning into K-12 education, formal classroom implementation still faces obstacles. Teachers lack the knowledge and skills, especially design-thinking competence, required to design an interdisciplinary STEM curriculum. The goal of this study was to investigate different scaffolding modes that may influence the design-thinking competence development of STEM teachers. Twenty-four preservice teachers participated in this study, which was carried out in an online STEM preservice teacher training environment. The participants were assigned to six groups of two cohorts. Each group designed a STEM learning module. To support their online design meetings, the three groups from the static scaffolding cohort (SSC) received pre-defined guiding questions, while the other three groups from the adaptive scaffolding cohort (ASC) received contingent scaffolding from a human tutor. The Log data on the participants' conversations in the design meetings were collected and analysed using the epistemic network analysis (ENA) approach. The results revealed that the SSC and ASC had divergent design-thinking development trajectories and established distinct design-thinking patterns. Conversation analysis of the two cohorts confirmed the findings of the ENA analysis and provided evidence that the two scaffolding modes can help address challenges to collaborative STEM learning design and cultivate design-thinking competence from different perspectives.
引用
收藏
页码:2271 / 2287
页数:17
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   Dealing with conflicts on knowledge in tutorial groups [J].
Aarnio, Matti ;
Lindblom-Ylanne, Sari ;
Nieminen, Juha ;
Pyorala, Eeva .
ADVANCES IN HEALTH SCIENCES EDUCATION, 2013, 18 (02) :215-230
[2]  
An Y-J., 2014, Journal of Online Learning Teaching, V10, P552
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2015, DESIGN THINKING ED C
[4]   Synthesizing Results From Empirical Research on Computer-Based Scaffolding in STEM Education: A Meta-Analysis [J].
Belland, Brian R. ;
Walker, Andrew E. ;
Kim, Nam Ju ;
Lefler, Mason .
REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 2017, 87 (02) :309-344
[5]   Exploring teachers' use of TPACK in design talk: The collaborative design of technology-rich early literacy activities [J].
Boschman, Ferry ;
McKenney, Susan ;
Voogt, Joke .
COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2015, 82 :250-262
[6]   Changes in science teachers' conceptions and connections of STEM concepts and earthquake engineering [J].
Cavlazoglu, Baki ;
Stuessy, Carol .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 2017, 110 (03) :239-254
[7]   Modeling primary school pre-service teachers' Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) for meaningful learning with information and communication technology (ICT) [J].
Chai, Ching Sing ;
Koh, Joyce Hwee Ling ;
Tsai, Chin-Chung ;
Tan, Lynde Lee Wee .
COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2011, 57 (01) :1184-1193
[8]  
Chai CS., 2017, Learning, V3, P114, DOI [10.1080/23735082.2017.1360506, DOI 10.1080/23735082.2017.1360506]
[9]  
Chua BL, 2015, MOTIVATION, LEADERSHIP AND CURRICULUM DESIGN: ENGAGING THE NET GENERATION AND 21ST CENTURY LEARNERS, P119, DOI 10.1007/978-981-287-230-2_10
[10]  
Committee on STEM Education, 2018, AM STRAT STEM ED