Beyond the Energy System: Modeling Frameworks Depicting Distributional Impacts for Interdisciplinary Policy Analysis

被引:8
作者
Montenegro, Roland Cunha [1 ]
Fragkos, Panagiotis [2 ]
Dobbins, Audrey Helen [1 ]
Schmid, Dorothea [1 ]
Pye, Steve [3 ]
Fahl, Ulrich [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Stuttgart, IER Inst Energy Econ & Rat Energy Use, Hessbruhlstr 49A, D-70565 Stuttgart, Germany
[2] E3Modelling, 70-72 Panormou St, Athens 11523, Greece
[3] UCL, UCL Energy Inst, Gower St, London WC1E 6BT, England
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
distributional impacts; energy policies; energy system modeling; environmental impacts; general equilibrium modeling; micro‐ simulation; model coupling; INPUT-OUTPUT MODEL; INCOME-DISTRIBUTION; PERSONAL EXPOSURE; SUBSIDY REMOVAL; STREET-LEVEL; CARBON TAXES; CGE MODELS; EMISSIONS; TAXATION; POVERTY;
D O I
10.1002/ente.202000668
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Since the signing of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development by the United Nations Member States and the Yellow vest movement, it is clear that emission-reducing policies should consider their distributional impacts to ensure a sustainable and equitable growth compatible with the Paris Agreement goals. To this end, the design of environmental and energy policies should be accompanied by an interdisciplinary analysis that includes potential effects on distinct groups of society (defined by income, age, or location), regions, and sectors. This work synthesizes common modeling frameworks used to assess technical, socio-economic, and environmental aspects in policy analysis and the recent progress to portray distributional impacts in each of them. Furthermore, the main indicators produced by each method are highlighted and a critical review pointing to gaps and limitations that could be addressed by future research is presented.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 106 条
  • [1] Adelman I., 1978, INCOME DISTRTIBUTION
  • [2] Climate volatility and poverty vulnerability in Tanzania
    Ahmed, Syud Amer
    Diffenbaugh, Noah S.
    Hertel, Thomas W.
    Lobell, David B.
    Ramankutty, Navin
    Rios, Ana R.
    Rowhani, Pedram
    [J]. GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2011, 21 (01): : 46 - 55
  • [3] Ahmed V., 2007, CGE-microsimulation modelling: a survey
  • [4] Distributional effects of subsidy removal and implementation of carbon taxes in Mexican households
    Alberto Rosas-Flores, Jorge
    Bakhat, Mohcine
    Rosas-Flores, Dionicio
    Fernandez Zayas, Jose Luis
    [J]. ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2017, 61 : 21 - 28
  • [5] The value-added of sectoral disaggregation: Implications on competitive consequences of climate change policies
    Alexeeva-Talebi, Victoria
    Boehringer, Christoph
    Loeschel, Andreas
    Voigt, Sebastian
    [J]. ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2012, 34 : S127 - S142
  • [6] Anand R., 2013, The Fiscal and Welfare Impacts of Reforming. IMF Working Paper,WP/13/128
  • [7] Combining Microsimulation and Agent-Based Model for Micro-Level Population Dynamics
    Bae, Jang Won
    Paik, Euihyun
    Kim, Kiho
    Singh, Karandeep
    Sajjad, Mazhar
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTATIONAL SCIENCE 2016 (ICCS 2016), 2016, 80 : 507 - 517
  • [8] Quadratic engel curves and consumer demand
    Banks, J
    Blundell, R
    Lewbel, A
    [J]. REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 1997, 79 (04) : 527 - 539
  • [9] The distributional effects of a carbon tax and its impact on fuel poverty: A microsimulation study in the French context
    Berry, Audrey
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2019, 124 : 81 - 94
  • [10] Bickel P., 2005, EXTERNE EXTERNALITIE