Reducing predictive uncertainty in model simulations: a comparison of two methods using the European Soil Erosion Model (EUROSEM)

被引:69
作者
Quinton, JN
机构
[1] Dept. of Nat. Resources Management, Sch. of Agric., Food and Environment, Cranfield University, Silsoe
关键词
soil erosion model; uncertainty; validation; calibration; evaluation; modelling;
D O I
10.1016/S0341-8162(97)00022-2
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
The simulation results from physically-based hydrology and erosion models contain uncertainty. This is largely the result of uncertainty over the value of the model's input parameters. if such uncertainties are in the form of probability distributions of model output, it becomes apparent that they are not inconsiderable. Such variation in model output may reduce the utility of the simulations and it is therefore desirable for it to be reduced. Two methods are considered: one which relies on improved parameter set selection, and a second which derives physical parameters from observed hydrographs. Both methods are compared with a blind application of the model and observed data. The results suggest that, while both methods may be successful in reducing the variation in model output, the coincidence with the observed data deteriorates. (C) 1997 Elsevier Science B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:101 / 117
页数:17
相关论文
共 35 条
[31]  
*SOIL SURV STAFF, 1975, AGR HDB USDA, V436
[32]  
TEMPLE DM, 1982, T ASAE, V25, P1300
[33]  
VANELEWIJCK L, 1989, BRIT GEOM RES GROUP
[34]  
Warrick A.W., 1980, APPL SOIL PHYS, P319, DOI [10.1016/B978-0-12-348580-9.50018-3, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-348580-9.50018-3]
[35]  
WOOLHISER DA, 1989, KINEROS KINEMATIC RU