Effect of a Checklist on Advanced Trauma Life Support Workflow Deviations during Trauma Resuscitations without Pre-Arrival Notification

被引:28
|
作者
Kelleher, Deirdre C. [1 ]
Bose, R. P. Jagadeesh Chandra [2 ]
Waterhouse, Lauren J. [1 ]
Carter, Elizabeth A. [1 ]
Burd, Randall S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Childrens Natl Med Ctr, Div Trauma & Burn Surg, Washington, DC 20010 USA
[2] Eindhoven Univ Technol, Dept Math & Comp Sci, NL-5600 MB Eindhoven, Netherlands
关键词
EMERGENCY-DEPARTMENT; ERRORS; PATIENT; TIME; CARE; COMMUNICATION; MORTALITY; SYSTEM; SAFETY; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.11.021
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: Trauma resuscitations without pre-arrival notification are often initially chaotic, which can potentially compromise patient care. We hypothesized that trauma resuscitations without pre-arrival notification are performed with more variable adherence to ATLS protocol and that implementation of a checklist would improve performance. STUDY DESIGN: We analyzed event logs of trauma resuscitations from two 4-month periods before (n = 222) and after (n = 215) checklist implementation. Using process mining techniques, individual resuscitations were compared with an ideal workflow model of 6 ATLS primary survey tasks performed by the bedside evaluator and given model fitness scores (range 0 to 1). Mean fitness scores and frequency of conformance (fitness 1) were compared (using Student's t-test or chi-square test, as appropriate) for activations with and without notification both before and after checklist implementation. Multivariable linear regression, controlling for patient and resuscitation characteristics, was also performed to assess the association between pre-arrival notification and model fitness before and after checklist implementation. RESULTS: Fifty-five (12.6%) resuscitations lacked pre-arrival notification (23 pre-implementation and 32 post-implementation; p = 0.15). Before checklist implementation, resuscitations without notification had lower fitness (0.80 vs 0.90; p < 0.001) and conformance (26.1% vs 50.8%; p = 0.03) than those with notification. After checklist implementation, the fitness (0.80 vs 0.91; p = 0.007) and conformance (26.1% vs 59.4%; p = 0.01) improved for resuscitations without notification, but still remained lower than activations with notification. In multivariable analysis, activations without notification had lower fitness both before (b = -0.11, p < 0.001) and after checklist implementation (b = -0.04, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Trauma resuscitations without pre-arrival notification are associated with a decreased adherence to key components of the ATLS primary survey protocol. The addition of a checklist improves protocol adherence and reduces the effect of notification on task performance. (C) 2014 by the American College of Surgeons
引用
收藏
页码:459 / 466
页数:8
相关论文
共 4 条
  • [1] Effect of a Checklist on Advanced Trauma Life Support Task Performance During Pediatric Trauma Resuscitation
    Kelleher, Deirdre C.
    Carter, Elizabeth A.
    Waterhouse, Lauren J.
    Parsons, Samantha E.
    Fritzeen, Jennifer L.
    Burd, Randall S.
    ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2014, 21 (10) : 1129 - 1134
  • [2] Effect of Family Presence on Advanced Trauma Life Support Task Performance During Pediatric Trauma Team Evaluation
    O'Connell, Karen J.
    Carter, Elizabeth A.
    Fritzeen, Jennifer L.
    Waterhouse, Lauren J.
    Burd, Randall S.
    PEDIATRIC EMERGENCY CARE, 2021, 37 (12) : E905 - E909
  • [3] Association Between Prearrival Notification Time and Advanced Trauma Life Support Protocol Adherence
    Ahmed, Omar Z.
    Yang, Sen
    Farneth, Richard A.
    Sarcevic, Aleksandra
    Marsic, Ivan
    Burd, Randall S.
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2019, 242 : 231 - 238
  • [4] Speak the same language. The importance of the Pre-Hospital Trauma Life Support® (PHTLS®) concept in the preclinical and the Advanced Trauma Life Support® (ATLS®) concept in the clinical emergency treatment of severely injured patients
    Scholz, B.
    Gliwitzky, B.
    Bouillon, B.
    Lackner, C. K.
    Hauer, T.
    Woelfl, C. G.
    NOTFALL & RETTUNGSMEDIZIN, 2010, 13 (01): : 58 - 64