Real Solutions for Fake News? Measuring the Effectiveness of General Warnings and Fact-Check Tags in Reducing Belief in False Stories on Social Media

被引:301
作者
Clayton, Katherine [1 ]
Blair, Spencer [1 ]
Busam, Jonathan A. [1 ]
Forstner, Samuel [1 ]
Glance, John [1 ]
Green, Guy [1 ]
Kawata, Anna [1 ]
Kovvuri, Akhila [1 ]
Martin, Jonathan [1 ]
Morgan, Evan [1 ]
Sandhu, Morgan [1 ]
Sang, Rachel [1 ]
Scholz-Bright, Rachel [1 ]
Welch, Austin T. [1 ]
Wolff, Andrew G. [1 ]
Zhou, Amanda [1 ]
Nyhan, Brendan [2 ]
机构
[1] Dartmouth Coll, Hanover, NH 03755 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
Fake news; Fact check; Warnings; Corrections; Social media; Misperceptions; CONTINUED INFLUENCE; MISINFORMATION; SCIENCE; BALANCE; ONLINE;
D O I
10.1007/s11109-019-09533-0
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Social media has increasingly enabled "fake news" to circulate widely, most notably during the 2016 U.S. presidential campaign. These intentionally false or misleading stories threaten the democratic goal of a well-informed electorate. This study evaluates the effectiveness of strategies that could be used by Facebook and other social media to counter false stories. Results from a pre-registered experiment indicate that false headlines are perceived as less accurate when people receive a general warning about misleading information on social media or when specific headlines are accompanied by a "Disputed" or "Rated false" tag. Though the magnitudes of these effects are relatively modest, they generally do not vary by whether headlines were congenial to respondents' political views. In addition, we find that adding a "Rated false" tag to an article headline lowers its perceived accuracy more than adding a "Disputed" tag (Facebook's original approach) relative to a control condition. Finally, though exposure to the "Disputed" or "Rated false" tags did not affect the perceived accuracy of unlabeled false or true headlines, exposure to a general warning decreased belief in the accuracy of true headlines, suggesting the need for further research into how to most effectively counter false news without distorting belief in true information.
引用
收藏
页码:1073 / 1095
页数:23
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]   Perceptions of scientific dissent undermine public support for environmental policy [J].
Aklin, Michael ;
Urpelainen, Johannes .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2014, 38 :173-177
[2]   Social Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election [J].
Allcott, Hunt ;
Gentzkow, Matthew .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 2017, 31 (02) :211-235
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2018, NIEMAN JOURNALISM LA
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2018, WHO FALLS FAKE UNPUB
[5]  
[Anonymous], pital Epidemiology, DOI [DOI 10.1017/ICE.2019.29, DOI 10.1017/xps.2014.7]
[6]  
Atkins L., 2017, Huffpost
[7]   Evaluating Online Labor Markets for Experimental Research: Amazon.com's Mechanical Turk [J].
Berinsky, Adam J. ;
Huber, Gregory A. ;
Lenz, Gabriel S. .
POLITICAL ANALYSIS, 2012, 20 (03) :351-368
[8]   In Related News, That Was Wrong: The Correction of Misinformation Through Related Stories Functionality in Social Media [J].
Bode, Leticia ;
Vraga, Emily K. .
JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION, 2015, 65 (04) :619-638
[9]   Counteracting the Politicization of Science [J].
Bolsen, Toby ;
Druckman, James N. .
JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION, 2015, 65 (05) :745-769
[10]   Balance as bias: global warming and the US prestige press [J].
Boykoff, MT ;
Boykoff, JM .
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2004, 14 (02) :125-136