The Empirical Study on the Efficiency of Regional Energy Conservation and Emissions Reduction in China

被引:0
作者
Wang La-fang [1 ]
Wang Shao-jun [1 ]
Zeng Chen [1 ]
机构
[1] Hunan Univ, Sch Econ & Trade, Changsha 410006, Hunan, Peoples R China
来源
2014 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT SCIENCE & ENGINEERING (ICMSE) | 2014年
关键词
DEA-Malmquist; Efficiency; Energy conservation and emissions reduction; Panel data; Region;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; O22 [运筹学];
学科分类号
070105 ; 12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
This paper using DEA-Malmquist productivity index evaluation method, build an evaluation index system of provincial energy conservation and emissions reduction including the energy conservation, emission reduction, desirable output and undesirable output indicators. The result shows that the efficiency of China's energy conservation and emissions reduction is promoted, mainly owes to technological progress; the efficiency of energy conservation and emissions reduction between regions are different. With the exception of Shanxi, Guizhou, Beijing, Inner Mongolia and Zhejiang having bigger than 1.1 in the efficiency of energy conservation and emissions reduction, all other regions present an obvious gap from the highest one. In particular, the efficiency in Qinghai, Guangxi, Chongqing, Sichuan and Xingjiang is lesser than 1, indicating that the efficiency has much space to improve. And then, the redundancy of the input is used to further analyze the cause of the efficiency of energy conservation and emissions reduction. We find that the redundancy of energy consumption is the largest among all the input in nation and regions, which reflect that the low energy efficiency is the most important reason restricts the efficiency of the energy conservation and emissions reduction. Generally, the input efficiency in eastern region is higher than the central and western regions, which can explain why the energy conservation and emissions reduction is most efficient in eastern region.
引用
收藏
页码:1540 / 1546
页数:7
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], J ENV ENG TECHNOL
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1978, EUR J OPER RES
[3]   MULTILATERAL COMPARISONS OF OUTPUT, INPUT, AND PRODUCTIVITY USING SUPERLATIVE INDEX NUMBERS [J].
CAVES, DW ;
CHRISTENSEN, LR ;
DIEWERT, WE .
ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 1982, 92 (365) :73-86
[4]  
Chen W, 2012, J CHANGCHUN U SCI TE, V25, P54
[5]  
Chen Y, 2010, J ECOLOGICAL ENV, V19, P419
[6]  
FARE R, 1989, REV ECON STAT, V71, P90
[7]  
Fare R., 1992, Journal of Productivity Analysis, V3, P85, DOI [DOI 10.1007/BF00158770, 10.1007/BF00158770]
[8]  
Guo Y, 2009, ENV PROTECTION, P8
[9]  
IAEA, 2005, EN IND SUST DEV GUID
[10]  
Joseph S, 2004, J ENV ASSESSMENT POL, P91