Entropy of Simulated Liquids Using Multiscale Cell Correlation

被引:14
作者
Ali, Hafiz Saqib [1 ,2 ]
Higham, Jonathan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Henchman, Richard H. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manchester, Manchester Inst Biotechnol, 131 Princess St, Manchester M1 7DN, Lancs, England
[2] Univ Manchester, Sch Chem, Oxford Rd, Manchester M13 9PL, Lancs, England
[3] Univ Edinburgh, Western Gen Hosp, Inst Genet & Mol Med, Human Genet Unit, Crewe Rd South, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, Midlothian, Scotland
基金
英国生物技术与生命科学研究理事会; 英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
structure; thermodynamics; probability distribution; force; torque; coordination; conformation; molecular dynamics simulation; CONFIGURATIONAL ENTROPY; MOLECULAR-DYNAMICS; CONFORMATIONAL ENTROPY; EFFICIENT CALCULATION; ABSOLUTE ENTROPY; VAPOR-PRESSURE; CARBON-DIOXIDE; HEAT-CAPACITY; FREE-ENERGY; VAPORIZATION;
D O I
10.3390/e21080750
中图分类号
O4 [物理学];
学科分类号
0702 ;
摘要
Accurately calculating the entropy of liquids is an important goal, given that many processes take place in the liquid phase. Of almost equal importance is understanding the values obtained. However, there are few methods that can calculate the entropy of such systems, and fewer still to make sense of the values obtained. We present our multiscale cell correlation (MCC) method to calculate the entropy of liquids from molecular dynamics simulations. The method uses forces and torques at the molecule and united-atom levels and probability distributions of molecular coordinations and conformations. The main differences with previous work are the consistent treatment of the mean-field cell approximation to the approriate degrees of freedom, the separation of the force and torque covariance matrices, and the inclusion of conformation correlation for molecules with multiple dihedrals. MCC is applied to a broader set of 56 important industrial liquids modeled using the Generalized AMBER Force Field (GAFF) and Optimized Potentials for Liquid Simulations (OPLS) force fields with 1.14*CM1A charges. Unsigned errors versus experimental entropies are 8.7 J K-1 mol-1 for GAFF and 9.8 J K-1 mol-1 for OPLS. This is significantly better than the 2-Phase Thermodynamics method for the subset of molecules in common, which is the only other method that has been applied to such systems. MCC makes clear why the entropy has the value it does by providing a decomposition in terms of translational and rotational vibrational entropy and topographical entropy at the molecular and united-atom levels.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 72 条
[1]   Gromacs: High performance molecular simulations through multi-level parallelism from laptops to supercomputers [J].
Abraham, Mark James ;
Murtola, Teemu ;
Schulz, Roland ;
Páll, Szilárd ;
Smith, Jeremy C. ;
Hess, Berk ;
Lindah, Erik .
SoftwareX, 2015, 1-2 :19-25
[2]   On the calculation of entropy from covariance matrices of the atomic fluctuations [J].
Andricioaei, I ;
Karplus, M .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 2001, 115 (14) :6289-6292
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2018, NIST Chemistry WebBook, DOI DOI 10.18434/T4D303
[4]   DIRECT ENTROPY CALCULATION FROM COMPUTER-SIMULATION OF LIQUIDS [J].
BARANYAI, A ;
EVANS, DJ .
PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 1989, 40 (07) :3817-3822
[5]   Molecular Recognition and Ligand Association [J].
Baron, Riccardo ;
McCammon, J. Andrew .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY, VOL 64, 2013, 64 :151-175
[6]   CONFORMATION OF PIPERIDINE AND OF DERIVATIVES WITH ADDITIONAL RING HETEROATOMS [J].
BLACKBURNE, ID ;
KATRITZKY, AR ;
TAKEUCHI, Y .
ACCOUNTS OF CHEMICAL RESEARCH, 1975, 8 (09) :300-306
[7]   Organised chaos: entropy in hybrid inorganic-organic systems and other materials [J].
Butler, Keith T. ;
Walsh, Aron ;
Cheetham, Anthony K. ;
Kieslich, Gregor .
CHEMICAL SCIENCE, 2016, 7 (10) :6316-6324
[8]   Force Field Benchmark of Organic Liquids: Density, Enthalpy of Vaporization, Heat Capacities, Surface Tension, Isothermal Compressibility, Volumetric Expansion Coefficient, and Dielectric Constant [J].
Caleman, Carl ;
van Maaren, Paul J. ;
Hong, Minyan ;
Hub, Jochen S. ;
Costa, Luciano T. ;
van der Spoel, David .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL THEORY AND COMPUTATION, 2012, 8 (01) :61-74
[9]  
Case D., 2015, AMBER 2015
[10]   Evaluating the accuracy of the quasiharmonic approximation [J].
Chang, CE ;
Chen, W ;
Gilson, MK .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL THEORY AND COMPUTATION, 2005, 1 (05) :1017-1028