Baseline value specification and sensitivity analysis in multiattribute project portfolio selection

被引:24
作者
Liesio, Juuso [1 ]
Punkka, Antti [1 ]
机构
[1] Aalto Univ, Sch Sci, Dept Math & Syst Anal, Syst Anal Lab, Aalto 00076, Finland
基金
芬兰科学院;
关键词
Decision analysis; Multiattribute project portfolio selection; Resource allocation; Linear-additive portfolio value; RESOURCE-ALLOCATION; DECISION-ANALYSIS; INFORMATION; INTERDEPENDENCIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejor.2014.02.009
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
A key issue in applying multi-attribute project portfolio models is specifying the baseline value - a parameter which defines how valuable not implementing a project is relative to the range of possible project values. In this paper we present novel baseline value specification techniques which admit incomplete preference statements and, unlike existing techniques, make it possible to model problems where the decision maker would prefer to implement a project with the least preferred performance level in each attribute. Furthermore, we develop computational methods for identifying the optimal portfolios and the value-to-cost -based project rankings for all baseline values. We also show how these results can be used to (i) analyze how sensitive project and portfolio decision recommendations are to variations in the baseline value and (ii) provide project decision recommendations in a situation where only incomplete information about the baseline value is available. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:946 / 956
页数:11
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], [No title captured]
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1990, Knapsack Problems: Algorithms and ComputerImplementations
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2013, J Bus Econ
[4]   Optimizing military capital planning [J].
Brown, GG ;
Dell, RF ;
Newman, AM .
INTERFACES, 2004, 34 (06) :415-425
[5]   On the Choice of Baselines in Multiattribute Portfolio Analysis: A Cautionary Note [J].
Clemen, Robert T. ;
Smith, James E. .
DECISION ANALYSIS, 2009, 6 (04) :256-262
[6]   MEASURABLE MULTIATTRIBUTE VALUE FUNCTIONS [J].
DYER, JS ;
SARIN, RK .
OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 1979, 27 (04) :810-822
[7]  
Ewing P.L., 2006, DECIS ANAL, V3, P33, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1287/deca.1060.0062, DOI 10.1287/DECA.1060.0062]
[8]   SELECTING A PORTFOLIO OF SOLAR-ENERGY PROJECTS USING MULTIATTRIBUTE PREFERENCE THEORY [J].
GOLABI, K ;
KIRKWOOD, CW ;
SICHERMAN, A .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1981, 27 (02) :174-189
[9]   An integrated decision-making approach for improving European air traffic management [J].
Grushka-Cockayne, Yael ;
De Reyck, Bert ;
Degraeve, Zeger .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2008, 54 (08) :1395-1409
[10]  
Kirkwood CW., 1997, Strategic Decision Making: Multiobjective Decision Analysis with Spreadsheets