Cross Pressure Scores: An Individual-Level Measure of Cumulative Partisan Pressures Arising from Social Group Memberships

被引:28
作者
Brader, Ted [1 ]
Tucker, Joshua A. [2 ]
Therriault, Andrew [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Ctr Polit Studies, Ann Arbor, MI 48106 USA
[2] NYU, New York, NY 10012 USA
[3] Lightbox Analyt, Los Angeles, CA 90046 USA
关键词
Cross pressures; Social groups; Partisanship; Political participation; Measurement; Political behavior; United States; Poland; POLITICAL TALK; NETWORKS; CONSEQUENCES; DISAGREEMENT; AMBIVALENCE; DEMOCRACY; HETEROGENEITY; INDIFFERENCE; CONTEXT;
D O I
10.1007/s11109-013-9222-8
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Early studies of voting behavior hypothesized that the degree to which an individual was "cross-pressured" might affect how she participates in politics. However, attention to this topic waned before returning in recent years, mainly within the narrower confines of social networks analysis. In an effort to encourage broader consideration of the role of cross-pressures in political behavior, we present a new approach to estimating cross-pressures that (1) is individual-specific, (2) reflects the cumulative cross-pressures faced by an individual from her many intersecting social strata and group memberships, irrespective of the mechanism by which those pressures are experienced, and (3) can be estimated using widely-available data in party systems of any size, thus making it easier to study the effect of cross-pressures cross-nationally and over time. We demonstrate that these estimates are robust to many estimation choices, correspond well to existing measures of cross-pressures, and are correlated with patterns of political engagement and participation predicted by extant theories.
引用
收藏
页码:23 / 51
页数:29
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] Measurement validity: A shared standard for qualitative and quantitative research
    Adcock, R
    Collier, D
    [J]. AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2001, 95 (03) : 529 - 546
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2000, PARTIES PARTISANS PO
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2005, The Social Logic of Politics: Personal Networks as Contexts for Political Behavior
  • [4] [Anonymous], 1998, Impersonal Influence: How Perceptions of Mass Collectives Affect Political Attitudes
  • [5] Ambivalence, information, and electoral choice
    Basinger, SJ
    Lavine, H
    [J]. AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2005, 99 (02) : 169 - 184
  • [6] Berelson B. R., 1954, VOTING STUDY OPINION
  • [7] Brader TED, 2008, POST-SOV AFF, V24, P1
  • [8] Campbell Angus., 1960, AM VOTER
  • [9] Converse PhilipE., 1968, Group dynamics, P199
  • [10] Craig SC, 2005, AMBIVALENCE AND THE STRUCTURE OF POLITICAL OPINION, P1, DOI 10.1057/9781403979094