Innovation benefits from nuclear phase-out: can they compensate the costs?

被引:6
作者
De Cian, Enrica [1 ,2 ]
Carrara, Samuel [1 ,2 ]
Tavoni, Massimo [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] FEEM, Milan, Italy
[2] Euromediterranean Ctr Climate Change CMCC, Milan, Italy
关键词
TECHNICAL CHANGE; CO2; ABATEMENT; ELECTRICITY; POLICY;
D O I
10.1007/s10584-013-0870-9
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper investigates whether an inefficient allocation of abatement due to constraints on the use of currently available low carbon mitigation options can promote innovation in new technologies and have a positive impact on welfare. We focus on the case of a nuclear power phase-out and endogenous technical change in energy efficiency and alternative low carbon technologies. The research is inspired by the re-thinking about nuclear power deployment which took place in some countries, especially in Western Europe, after the Fukushima accident in March 2011. The analysis uses an Integrated Assessment Model, WITCH, which features multiple externalities related to greenhouse gas emissions and innovation market failures. Our results show that phasing out nuclear power stimulates R&D investments and deployment of technologies with large learning potential. The resulting technology benefits that would not otherwise occur due to intertemporal and international externalities almost completely offset the economic costs of foregoing nuclear power. The extent of technology benefits depends on the stringency of the climate policy and is distributed unevenly across countries.
引用
收藏
页码:637 / 650
页数:14
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   THE ECONOMIC-IMPLICATIONS OF LEARNING BY DOING [J].
ARROW, KJ .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 1962, 29 (80) :155-173
[2]   Subsidies for electricity-generating technologies: A review [J].
Badcock, Jeremy ;
Lenzen, Manfred .
ENERGY POLICY, 2010, 38 (09) :5038-5047
[3]  
Bosetti V, 2009, 200985 FONDAZIONE EN
[4]  
Bosetti V, 2006, ENERG J, P13
[5]   Allocation of pollution abatement under learning by doing [J].
Bramoullé, Y ;
Olson, LJ .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2005, 89 (9-10) :1935-1960
[6]   Do technology externalities justify restrictions on emission permit trading? [J].
De Cian, Enrica ;
Tavoni, Massimo .
RESOURCE AND ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2012, 34 (04) :624-646
[7]   Technology innovation and diffusion in "less than ideal" climate policies: An assessment with the WITCH model [J].
De Cian, Enrica ;
Bosetti, Valentina ;
Tavoni, Massimo .
CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2012, 114 (01) :121-143
[8]   Providing all global energy with wind, water, and solar power, Part II: Reliability, system and transmission costs, and policies [J].
Delucchi, Mark A. ;
Jacobson, Mark Z. .
ENERGY POLICY, 2011, 39 (03) :1170-1190
[9]   Optimal Timing of Climate Change Policy: Interaction Between Carbon Taxes and Innovation Externalities [J].
Gerlagh, Reyer ;
Kverndokk, Snorre ;
Rosendahl, Knut Einar .
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2009, 43 (03) :369-390
[10]  
Golombek R., 2006, Advances in Economic Analysis Policy, V6