Value of helical computed tomography in the management of upper esophageal foreign bodies

被引:69
作者
De Lucas, EM [1 ]
Sádaba, P [1 ]
García-Barón, PL [1 ]
Ruiz-Delgado, ML [1 ]
Sánchez, FG [1 ]
Ortiz, A [1 ]
Pagola, MA [1 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Univ Marques de Valdecila, Serv Radiodiagnost, Santander 39008, Cantabria, Spain
关键词
barium; esophagoscopy; esophagus; foreign body; helical computed; tomography;
D O I
10.1080/02841850410005516
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To analyze the utility of helical computed tomography (CT) in the diagnosis of Suspected upper esophageal foreign bodies. Material and Methods: A prospective study was performed on 36 patients (26 F, 10 M, mean age 70 years) with a history of foreign body impaction. All had negative findings at indirect laryngoscopy. Radiologic assessment included unenhanced helical CT and a barium contrast study. Patients with positive findings were taken to esophagoscopy. All patients had a posterior clinical surveillance. Results: Twenty patients had both normal CT and barium study and satisfactory clinical outcome. In 12 patients a foreign body was noted in the cervical esophagus by CT, barium study, and endoscopy. In one patient a fish bone was detected by CT (and not by barium) confirmed with esophagoscopy. Another patient bad a fish bone esophageal perforation which was observed only by CT and confirmed at surgery. Two patients with normal barium and endoscopy presented a false-positive CT result. Conclusion: Barium swallow is currently the first radiologic study, but may involve a risk of aspiration and can impede a subsequent esophagoscopy. Esophagoscopy is an invasive technique with a certain risk of serious complications that can be avoided with a satisfactory radiologic assessment. CT is easy, fast, has 100% sensitivity and is therefore the first choice technique for diagnosing suspected upper esophageal foreign bodies not expected to be visible on plain radiographs.
引用
收藏
页码:369 / 374
页数:6
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
BRAVERMAN I, 1993, J OTOLARYNGOL, V22, P311
[2]  
Douglas JV, 1999, M D COMPUT, V16, P11
[3]   Computed tomography diagnosis of esophageal bone impaction: A prospective study [J].
Eliashar, R ;
Dano, I ;
Dangoor, E ;
Braverman, I ;
Sichel, JY .
ANNALS OF OTOLOGY RHINOLOGY AND LARYNGOLOGY, 1999, 108 (07) :708-710
[4]  
ENDICOTT JN, 1986, LARYNGOSCOPE, V96, P751
[5]   THE LATERAL NECK RADIOGRAPH IN SUSPECTED IMPACTED FISH BONES - DOES IT HAVE A ROLE [J].
EVANS, RM ;
AHUJA, A ;
WILLIAMS, SR ;
VANHASSELT, CA .
CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 1992, 46 (02) :121-123
[6]   CT DIAGNOSIS OF AN ESOPHAGEAL FOREIGN-BODY [J].
GAMBA, JL ;
HEASTON, DK ;
LING, D ;
KOROBKIN, M .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1983, 140 (02) :289-290
[7]   MANAGEMENT OF INGESTED FOREIGN OBJECTS AND FOOD BOLUS IMPACTIONS [J].
GINSBERG, GG .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1995, 41 (01) :33-38
[8]   CT DEMONSTRATION OF AN AORTOESOPHAGEAL FISTULA [J].
LONGO, JM ;
LOPEZRASINES, G ;
ORTEGA, E ;
PAGOLA, MA .
CARDIOVASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 1987, 10 (02) :84-85
[9]   Use of plain radiography and computed tomography to identify fish bone foreign bodies [J].
Lue, AJ ;
Fang, WD ;
Manolidis, S .
OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2000, 123 (04) :435-438
[10]  
Morales-Angulo C, 1998, Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp, V49, P644