[F18] FDG-PET/CT for manual or semiautomated GTV delineation of the primary tumor for radiation therapy planning in patients with esophageal cancer: is it useful?

被引:1
作者
Walter, Franziska [1 ]
Jell, Constanze [1 ]
Zollner, Barbara [1 ]
Andrae, Claudia [1 ]
Gerum, Sabine [2 ]
Ilhan, Harun [3 ]
Belka, Claus [1 ]
Niyazi, Maximilian [1 ]
Roeder, Falk [2 ]
机构
[1] Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munchen, Univ Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Munich, Germany
[2] Paracelsus Med Univ PMU, Landeskrankenhaus, Dept Radiotherapy & Radiat Oncol, Salzburg, Austria
[3] Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munchen, Univ Hosp, Dept Nucl Oncol, Munich, Germany
关键词
Radiotherapy; PERCIST-TLG; Contouring; Gross tumor volume; Interobserver variability; POSITRON-EMISSION-TOMOGRAPHY; SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA; GROSS TUMOR; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; ADDITIONAL VALUE; CHEMORADIOTHERAPY; RADIOTHERAPY; NEOADJUVANT; JUNCTION; VOLUMES;
D O I
10.1007/s00066-020-01701-0
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background Target volume definition of the primary tumor in esophageal cancer is usually based on computed tomography (CT) supported by endoscopy and/or endoscopic ultrasound and can be difficult given the low soft-tissue contrast of CT resulting in large interobserver variability. We evaluated the value of a dedicated planning [F18] FDG-Positron emission tomography/computer tomography (PET/CT) for harmonization of gross tumor volume (GTV) delineation and the feasibility of semiautomated structures for planning purposes in a large cohort. Methods Patients receiving a dedicated planning [F18] FDG-PET/CT (06/201103/2016) were included. GTV was delineated on CT and on PET/CT (GTVCT and GTVPET/CT, respectively) by three independent radiation oncologists. Interobserver variability was evaluated by comparison of mean GTV and mean tumor lengths, and via SorensenDice coefficients (DSC) for spatial overlap. Semiautomated volumes were constructed based on PET/CT using fixed standardized uptake values (SUV) thresholds (SUV30, 35, and 40) or background- and metabolically corrected PERCIST-TLG and Schaefer algorithms, and compared to manually delineated volumes. Results 45 cases were evaluated. Mean GTVCT and GTVPET/CT were 59.2/58.0 ml, 65.4/64.1 ml, and 60.4/59.2 ml for observers AC. No significant difference between CT- and PET/CT-based delineation was found comparing the mean volumes or lengths. Mean Dice coefficients on CT and PET/CT were 0.79/0.77, 0.81/0.78, and 0.8/0.78 for observer pairs AB, AC, and BC, respectively, with no significant differences. Mean GTV volumes delineated semiautomatically with SUV30/SUV35/SUV40/Schaefers and PERCIST-TLG threshold were 69.1/23.9/18.8/18.6 and 70.9 ml. The best concordance of a semiautomatically delineated structure with the manually delineated GTVCT/GTVPET/CT was observed for PERCIST-TLG. Conclusion We were not able to show that the integration of PET/CT for GTV delineation of the primary tumor resulted in reduced interobserver variability. The PERCIST-TLG algorithm seemed most promising compared to other thresholds for further evaluation of semiautomated delineation of esophageal cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:780 / 790
页数:11
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   Positron emission tomography changes management and prognostic stratification in patients with oesophageal cancer: results of a multicentre prospective study [J].
Chatterton, B. E. ;
Shon, I. Ho ;
Baldey, A. ;
Lenzo, N. ;
Patrikeos, A. ;
Kelley, B. ;
Wong, D. ;
Ramshaw, J. E. ;
Scott, A. M. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2009, 36 (03) :354-361
[2]   Intra-tumour 18F-FDG uptake heterogeneity decreases the reliability on target volume definition with positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging [J].
Dong, Xinzhe ;
Wu, Peipei ;
Sun, Xiaorong ;
Li, Wenwu ;
Wan, Honglin ;
Yu, Jinming ;
Xing, Ligang .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING AND RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2015, 59 (03) :338-345
[3]   Initial report on feasibility of PET/CT-based image-guided moderate hypofractionated thoracic irradiation in node-positive non-small cell lung Cancer patients with poor prognostic factors and strongly diminished lung function: a retrospective analysis [J].
Eze, Chukwuka ;
Taugner, Julian ;
Roengvoraphoj, Olarn ;
Schmidt-Hegemann, Nina-Sophie ;
Kaesmann, Lukas ;
Wijaya, Cherylina ;
Belka, Claus ;
Manapov, Farkhad .
RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2019, 14 (01)
[4]  
Grosu AL, 2005, STRAHLENTHER ONKOL, V181, P483, DOI 10.1007/s00066-005-1422-7
[5]  
Haefner MF, 2018, STRAHLENTHER ONKOL, V194, P116, DOI 10.1007/s00066-017-1211-0
[6]   COMPARISON OF 18F-FLUOROTHYMIDINE AND 18F-FLUORODEOXYGLUCOSE PET/CT IN DELINEATING GROSS TUMOR VOLUME BY OPTIMAL THRESHOLD IN PATIENTS WITH SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA OF THORACIC ESOPHAGUS [J].
Han, Dali ;
Yu, Jinming ;
Yu, Yonghua ;
Zhang, Guifang ;
Zhong, Xaojun ;
Lu, Jie ;
Yin, Yong ;
Fu, Zheng ;
Mu, Dianbin ;
Zhang, Baijiang ;
He, Wei ;
Huo, Zhijun ;
Liu, Xijun ;
Kong, Lei ;
Zhao, Shuqiang ;
Sun, Xiangyu .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2010, 76 (04) :1235-1241
[7]  
Hegemann NS, 2018, STRAHLENTHER ONKOL, V194, P435, DOI 10.1007/s00066-018-1261-y
[8]   COMBINED CHEMOTHERAPY AND RADIOTHERAPY COMPARED WITH RADIOTHERAPY ALONE IN PATIENTS WITH CANCER OF THE ESOPHAGUS [J].
HERSKOVIC, A ;
MARTZ, K ;
ALSARRAF, M ;
LEICHMAN, L ;
BRINDLE, J ;
VAITKEVICIUS, V ;
COOPER, J ;
BYHARDT, R ;
DAVIS, L ;
EMAMI, B .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1992, 326 (24) :1593-1598
[9]   Radiotherapy volume delineation using 18F-FDG-PET/CT modifies gross node volume in patients with oesophageal cancer [J].
Jimenez-Jimenez, E. ;
Mateos, P. ;
Aymar, N. ;
Roncero, R. ;
Ortiz, I. ;
Gimenez, M. ;
Pardo, J. ;
Salinas, J. ;
Sabater, S. .
CLINICAL & TRANSLATIONAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 20 (11) :1460-1466
[10]   The additional value of integrated PET/CT over PET in initial lymph node staging of esophageal cancer [J].
Kato, Hiroyuki ;
Kimura, Hitoshi ;
Nakajima, Masanobu ;
Sakai, Makoto ;
Sano, Akihiko ;
Tanaka, Naritaka ;
Inose, Takanori ;
Faried, Ahmad ;
Saito, Kana ;
Ieta, Keisuke ;
Sohda, Makoto ;
Fukai, Yasuyuki ;
Miyazaki, Tatsuya ;
Masuda, Norihiro ;
Fukuchi, Minoru ;
Ojima, Hitoshi ;
Tsukada, Katsuhiko ;
Oriuchi, Noboru ;
Endo, Keigo ;
Kuwano, Hiroyuki .
ONCOLOGY REPORTS, 2008, 20 (04) :857-862