Methodology to evaluate the uncertainty associated with nanoparticle dimensional measurements by SEM

被引:17
作者
Crouzier, L. [1 ,2 ]
Delvallee, A. [1 ]
Allard, A. [3 ]
Devoille, L. [1 ]
Ducourtieux, S. [1 ]
Feltin, N. [1 ]
机构
[1] Lab Natl Metrol & Essais, Nanometrol, 29 Ave Hennequin, F-78197 Trappes, France
[2] Inst Pprime, Dept Phys & Mecan Mat, 11 Bd Marie & Pierre Curie, F-86962 Futuroscope, France
[3] Math & Stat Dept, Lab Natl Metrol & Essais, 29 Ave Hennequin, F-78197 Trappes, France
关键词
nanoparticles; size distribution; SEM; uncertainty budget; ELECTRON; DIAMETER; BEAM;
D O I
10.1088/1361-6501/ab1495
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The scanning electron microscopy (SEM) technique is widely used for the characterizing of nanoparticle (NP) size, but very few papers deal with NP dimensional metrology. This article reports on a methodology with which to evaluate the uncertainty budget associated with the measurement of the mean diameter of a standard silica NP population by SEM. In this context, the effects of potential error sources have been evaluated though a metrological qualification of the instrument. The measuring method, consisting of determining the area equivalent diameter taken at middle height (Deq-FEHM), has been tested on a reference silica NP with an indicative certification value given by SEM/TEM (number-based modal diameter). Because agglomeration phenomena can cause measurements errors, semi-automatic homemade software has been employed to build the diameter distribution histogram, selecting only isolated particles. Finally, an uncertainty budget, including the main experimental components, has been established for the mean diameter measurement of this silica NP population. The main contributors to this uncertainty budget are the resolution linked to the dimension of the electron beam diameter at the focal plane, the calibration uncertainty on reference NPs, and the measurement repeatability.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2008, 92766 ISO
[2]  
[Anonymous], 28037 ISOTS
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2014, ISO 13322-1
[4]   Technique to automatically measure electron-beam diameter and astigmatism: BEAMETR [J].
Babin, S. ;
Gaevski, M. ;
Joy, D. ;
Machin, M. ;
Martynov, A. .
JOURNAL OF VACUUM SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY B, 2006, 24 (06) :2956-2959
[5]  
Carl Zeiss SMT-Nano Technology Systems Division, DET PRINC BAS GEMINI
[6]   Closed-Loop Autofocus Scheme for Scanning Electron Microscope [J].
Cui, Le ;
Marturi, Naresh ;
Marchand, Eric ;
Dembele, Sounkalo ;
Piat, Nadine .
INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM OF OPTOMECHATRONICS TECHNOLOGY (ISOT 2015), 2015, 32
[7]   Size measurement uncertainties of near-monodisperse, near-spherical nanoparticles using transmission electron microscopy and particle-tracking analysis [J].
De Temmerman, Pieter-Jan ;
Verleysen, Eveline ;
Lammertyn, Jeroen ;
Mast, Jan .
JOURNAL OF NANOPARTICLE RESEARCH, 2014, 16 (10)
[8]   Direct comparison of AFM and SEM measurements on the same set of nanoparticles [J].
Delvallee, A. ;
Feltin, N. ;
Ducourtieux, S. ;
Trabelsi, M. ;
Hochepied, J. F. .
MEASUREMENT SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 26 (08)
[9]   Uncertainties of size measurements in electron microscopy characterization of nanomaterials in foods [J].
Dudkiewicz, Agnieszka ;
Boxall, Alistair B. A. ;
Chaudhry, Qasim ;
Molhave, Kristian ;
Tiede, Karen ;
Hofmann, Peter ;
Linsinger, Thomas P. J. .
FOOD CHEMISTRY, 2015, 176 :472-479
[10]  
Feltin N, 2017, NANOTECH INNOV APPL, P197