Optimized method for ureteric reconstruction in a mouse kidney transplant model

被引:4
作者
Wang, Zane Z.
Wang, Chuanmin
Cunningham, Eithne C.
Allen, Richard D. M.
Sharland, Alexandra F.
Bishop, George Alexander
机构
[1] Royal Prince Alfred Hosp, Bosch Inst, Collaborat Transplantat Res Grp, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Univ Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
anastomosis; kidney; mouse; transplantation; ureter; LIVER; MICE;
D O I
10.1111/ans.12395
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Murine kidney transplantation is an important model for studies of transplantation immunobiology. The most challenging aspect of the difficult surgical procedure is the ureteric anastomosis. Methods Two different approaches to ureteric reconstruction are compared here. Method 1, Patch: this involves anastomosis of the donor ureter together with a patch of donor bladder to recipient bladder. Method 2, Implant: this utilizes a 5-0 suture to pull the ureter through the bladder wall. The ureter's peripheral tissue is then fixed to the bladder wall at the implant site with 10-0 micro-sutures. Results In animals transplanted with the patch method, the initial success rate, defined as survival up to the third post-operative day, was 79% (n = 62), whereas the initial success rate for the implant method was 86.1% (n = 101; P = 0.28). The death rate from unknown and/or unspecified causes in the initial period was 16.1% (10/62) for the patch method, and 8.9% (9/101) for the implant method (P = 0.21). The average donor/recipient operation time with the implant method was 14.8 +/- 2.2/61.4 +/- 4.7min (76min per transplant), whereas operation time with the patch method was 28.3 +/- 2.4/77.8 +/- 5.5min (106min per transplant; P < 0.001). The ureteric implant method resulted in a lower rate of urinary leak compared with the patch method (1.1% versus 10.2%; P = 0.02). Conclusions The ureteric implant method for mouse kidney transplantation is a reliable approach with at least as high a success rate as the bladder patch method and with a shorter operation time.
引用
收藏
页码:481 / 485
页数:5
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]   SURVIVAL OF UNMODIFIED SPLEEN ALLOGRAFTS IN RATS [J].
BITTERSUERMANN, H .
NATURE, 1974, 247 (5441) :465-466
[2]   A novel mouse renal transplant technique [J].
Ge, Xupeng ;
Timsit, Marc-Olivier ;
Tullius, Stefan G. .
TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 24 (04) :e35-e37
[3]  
Han WR, 1999, MICROSURG, V19, P272, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2752(1999)19:6<272::AID-MICR3>3.0.CO
[4]  
2-L
[5]   A MICROSURGICAL TECHNIQUE FOR RENAL-TRANSPLANTATION IN MICE [J].
KALINA, SL ;
MOTTRAM, PL .
AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1993, 63 (03) :213-216
[6]   Learning curve, surgical results and operative complications for kidney transplantation in mice [J].
Martins, Paulo N. .
MICROSURGERY, 2006, 26 (08) :590-593
[7]  
Martins Paulo N., 2006, Int. braz j urol., V32, P713, DOI 10.1590/S1677-55382006000600013
[8]   KIDNEY-TRANSPLANTS IN MICE - ANALYSIS OF IMMUNE STATUS OF MICE BEARING LONG-TERM, H-2 INCOMPATIBLE TRANSPLANTS [J].
RUSSELL, PS ;
CHASE, CM ;
COLVIN, RB ;
PLATE, JMD .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 1978, 147 (05) :1449-1468
[9]  
SKOSKIEWICZ M, 1973, TRANSPL P, V5, P721
[10]   Spontaneous acceptance of mouse kidney allografts is associated with increased Foxp3 expression and differences in the B and T cell compartments [J].
Wang, Chuanmin ;
Cordoba, Shaun ;
Hu, Min ;
Bertolino, Patrick ;
Bowen, David G. ;
Sharland, Alexandra F. ;
Allen, Richard D. M. ;
Alexander, Stephen I. ;
McCaughan, Geoffrey W. ;
Bishop, G. Alex .
TRANSPLANT IMMUNOLOGY, 2011, 24 (03) :149-156