The Development of the Informant Five-Factor Borderline Inventory

被引:1
作者
Min, Jiwon [1 ]
Mullins-Sweatt, Stephanie N. [1 ]
Widiger, Thomas A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Oklahoma State Univ, Stillwater, OK 74078 USA
[2] Univ Kentucky, Lexington, KY USA
关键词
borderline personality disorder; informant report; five-factor model; dimensional model; PERSONALITY-DISORDER; DIMENSIONAL STRUCTURE; SELF-REPORTS; MODEL; TRAITS; CLASSIFICATION; COMORBIDITY; VALIDITY; FORM;
D O I
10.1177/1073191120959763
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is one of the most studied personality disorders and is associated with significant outcomes such as suicide. Although BPD is represented inDSM-5as a categorical diagnosis, it may be better characterized dimensionally, such as from the perspective of the five-factor model of general personality (FFM). The Five-Factor Borderline Inventory (FFBI) assesses BPD from the perspective of maladaptive variants of FFM traits. Previous research suggests that informant-reports may increase the validity of personality disorder assessment, providing additional information that may supplement self-report. Therefore, the current study developed an informant measure of the FFBI, Informant Five-Factor Borderline Inventory (IFFBI) and examined its convergent and discriminant validity compared with the self-report FFBI, FFM, and traditional measure of BPD. Overall, the IFFBI demonstrated good convergent validity and moderate discriminant validity with the FFBI, FFM, and other traditional measures of BPD.
引用
收藏
页码:1334 / 1344
页数:11
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2001, OMNI PERSONALITY INV
  • [2] TAXOMIETRIC EVIDENCE FOR THE DIMENSIONAL STRUCTURE OF CLUSTER-C, PARANOID, AND BORDERLINE PERSONALITY DISORDERS
    Arntz, Arnoud
    Bernstein, David
    Gielen, Dominique
    van Nieuwenhuyzen, Myrthe
    Penders, Krystle
    Haslam, Nick
    Ruscio, John
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY DISORDERS, 2009, 23 (06) : 606 - 628
  • [3] Association A.P, 2013, Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, DOI DOI 10.1176/APPI.BOOKS.9780890425596
  • [4] Are Informant Reports of Personality More Internally Consistent Than Self Reports of Personality?
    Balsis, Steve
    Cooper, Luke D.
    Oltmanns, Thomas F.
    [J]. ASSESSMENT, 2015, 22 (04) : 399 - 404
  • [5] THE ROLE OF METAPERCEPTION IN PERSONALITY DISORDERS: DO PEOPLE WITH PERSONALITY PROBLEMS KNOW HOW OTHERS EXPERIENCE THEIR PERSONALITY?
    Carlson, Erika N.
    Oltmanns, Thomas F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY DISORDERS, 2015, 29 (04) : 449 - 467
  • [6] Assessment and diagnosis of personality disorder: Perennial issues and an emerging reconceptualization
    Clark, Lee Anna
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 58 : 227 - 257
  • [7] THE 5-FACTOR MODEL OF PERSONALITY AND ITS RELEVANCE TO PERSONALITY-DISORDERS
    COSTA, PT
    MCCRAE, RR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY DISORDERS, 1992, 6 (04) : 343 - 359
  • [8] FFMPD Scales: Comparisons With the FFM, PID-5, and CAT-PD-SF
    Crego, Cristina
    Oltmanns, Joshua R.
    Widiger, Thomas A.
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2018, 30 (01) : 62 - 73
  • [9] The Discriminant (and Convergent) Validity of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5
    Crego, Cristina
    Gore, Whitney L.
    Rojas, Stephanie L.
    Widiger, Thomas A.
    [J]. PERSONALITY DISORDERS-THEORY RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2015, 6 (04) : 321 - 335
  • [10] THE SELF-IMAGE IN BORDERLINE PERSONALITY DISORDER: AN IN-DEPTH QUALITATIVE RESEARCH STUDY
    Dammann, Gerhard
    Huegli, Claudia
    Selinger, Joseph
    Gremaud-Heitz, Daniela
    Sollberger, Daniel
    Wiesbeck, Gerhard A.
    Kuechenhoff, Joachim
    Walter, Marc
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY DISORDERS, 2011, 25 (04) : 517 - 527