Comparing the neuropsychiatric inventory and the revised memory and behavior problems checklist for associations with caregiver burden and depressive symptoms

被引:16
作者
Jackson, Mark A. [1 ]
Fauth, Elizabeth B. [1 ]
Geiser, Christian [2 ]
机构
[1] Utah State Univ, Dept Family Consumer & Human Dev, Logan, UT 84321 USA
[2] Utah State Univ, Dept Psychol, Logan, UT 84321 USA
关键词
dementia; depression; carers; behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD); rating scales; ALZHEIMERS-DISEASE; DEMENTIA; RELIABILITY; VALIDATION; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1017/S1041610213002421
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Background: Few empirical studies compare the ability of prominent measures of behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) to explain key caregiver outcomes. We compared the respective abilities of the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) and the Revised Memory and Behavior Problems Checklist (RMBPC) to detect associations between BPSD and caregiver depressive symptoms. Our results may facilitate measurement decisions for researchers and clinicians. Methods: The NPI and the RMBPC, which measure BPSD frequency and corresponding caregiver appraisals, were administered to 164 caregivers of persons with dementia to compare the measures' ability to explain caregiver depressive symptoms. Depressive symptoms were measured using the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS), and caregiver burden was measured (using the Zarit Burden Interview) as a mediator between BPSD frequency/appraisal and caregiver depressive symptoms. Path analysis using Mplus facilitated the comparison between the RMBPC and the NPI. Results: Significant indirect associations were present when NPI frequency, NPI appraisal, RMBPC frequency, and RMBPC appraisal were modeled separately with burden and depressive symptoms, although indirect relationships are not associated with increases in R-2. Only RMBPC appraisal produced both a significant direct association with depressive symptoms and a significant increase in R-2 when modeled separately (beta = 0.24, p < 0.01; Delta R-2 = 0.04, p < 0.05). When all independent variables were modeled together, only RMBPC appraisal demonstrated significant direct (beta = 0.23, p < 0.01) and indirect associations. Conclusion: The RMBPC might be more suitable than the NPI in studies measuring BPSD to explain key caregiver outcomes such as depressive symptoms.
引用
收藏
页码:1021 / 1031
页数:11
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] Aiken LS., 1991, MULTIPLE REGRESSION
  • [2] Reliability generalization of responses by care providers to the Zarit Burden Interview
    Bachner, Y. G.
    O'Rourke, N.
    [J]. AGING & MENTAL HEALTH, 2007, 11 (06) : 678 - 685
  • [3] Impact of behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia on caregivers
    Ballard, C
    Lowery, K
    Powell, I
    O'Brien, J
    James, I
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL PSYCHOGERIATRICS, 2000, 12 : 93 - 105
  • [4] BENTLER PM, 1990, PSYCHOL BULL, V107, P238, DOI 10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588
  • [5] Factor structure and reliability of the brain impairment behavior scale
    Cameron, Jill I.
    Cheung, Angela M.
    Streiner, David L.
    Coyte, Peter C.
    Singh, Mina D.
    Stewart, Donna E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE NURSING, 2008, 40 (01) : 40 - 47
  • [6] Predicting caregiver burden and depression in Alzheimer's disease
    Clyburn, LD
    Stones, MJ
    Hadjistavropoulos, T
    Tuokko, H
    [J]. JOURNALS OF GERONTOLOGY SERIES B-PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES, 2000, 55 (01): : S2 - S13
  • [7] The neuropsychiatric inventory: Assessing psychopathology in dementia patients
    Cummings, JL
    [J]. NEUROLOGY, 1997, 48 (05) : S10 - S16
  • [8] THE NEUROPSYCHIATRIC INVENTORY - COMPREHENSIVE ASSESSMENT OF PSYCHOPATHOLOGY IN DEMENTIA
    CUMMINGS, JL
    MEGA, M
    GRAY, K
    ROSENBERGTHOMPSON, S
    CARUSI, DA
    GORNBEIN, J
    [J]. NEUROLOGY, 1994, 44 (12) : 2308 - 2314
  • [9] de Jonghe J F M, 2003, Tijdschr Gerontol Geriatr, V34, P74
  • [10] Self-destructive behaviors in nursing home residents
    Draper, B
    Brodaty, H
    Low, LF
    Richards, V
    Paton, H
    Lie, D
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2002, 50 (02) : 354 - 358