Informal government preferences and asymmetric land allocation in China

被引:14
|
作者
Wu, Shuping [1 ]
Yang, Zan [2 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Jiaotong Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing 100044, Peoples R China
[2] Tsinghua Univ, Dept Construct Management, Tsinghua Hang Lung Ctr Real Estate, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 中国博士后科学基金;
关键词
Land allocation; Government preference; Political connection; China; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; POLICY; COMMODIFICATION; PROCUREMENT; CORRUPTION; FINANCE; FIRMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105085
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Whether governments have informal preferences toward firms when allocating land resources and the effects of such preferences on regional development remain unclear, particularly in countries with weak formal institutions. This paper investigates the government's informal preferences in land allocations in China. Substantial evidence is found that politically connected firms are preferred to win land auctions at lower prices due to two different reasons. These preferences are informally achieved through a two-stage auction mechanism rather than formal bid preference programs, and result in the asymmetrical allocation of urban land in terms of land quality, quantity, and price, across politically and non-politically connected firms in China. The state-owned enterprises are allocated poor quality land parcels at 55% land price discounts. In comparison, the manager-based politically connected firms are allocated regular land parcels at 6% price discounts, and other firms without connections with the government are allocated regular land at higher prices.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Land ownership and the likelihood of land development at the urban fringe: The case of Shenzhen, China
    Tong, De
    Wang, Xiaoguang
    Wu, Lingjing
    Zhao, Nanqi
    HABITAT INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 73 : 43 - 52
  • [22] The social politics of dispossession: Informal institutions and land expropriation in China
    Kan, Karita
    URBAN STUDIES, 2020, 57 (16) : 3331 - 3346
  • [23] Why the Central government prefers to centralize spatial planning approval authority in China? An explanation based on land risk
    Zhou, Tianxiao
    Hu, Rumei
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2023, 66 (14) : 2832 - 2853
  • [24] Engines of Growth in China: The Limits of Informal Institutions
    Cunningham, Christopher
    Dibooglu, Sel
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC ISSUES, 2020, 54 (01) : 252 - 275
  • [25] Rural Land Use Change Driven by Informal Industrialization: Evidence from Fengzhuang Village in China
    Yin, Jie
    Zhao, Xu
    Zhang, Wenjia
    Wang, Pei
    LAND, 2020, 9 (06)
  • [26] Fiscal policy choices of local governments in China: Land finance or local government debt?
    Cheng, Yudan
    Jia, Shanghui
    Meng, Huan
    INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ECONOMICS & FINANCE, 2022, 80 : 294 - 308
  • [27] Analyzing the Land Leasing Behavior of the Government of Beijing, China, via the Multinomial Logit Model
    Cheng, Jing
    Luo, Xiaowei
    LAND, 2022, 11 (03)
  • [28] Understanding the role of government in regional industrial evolution: Evidence from land supply in China
    Huang, Zhiji
    Shi, Tao
    Tong, De
    PAPERS IN REGIONAL SCIENCE, 2025, 104 (01)
  • [29] Better Government, Happier Residents? Quality of Government and Life Satisfaction in China
    Liu, Huaxing
    Gao, Hong
    Huang, Qing
    SOCIAL INDICATORS RESEARCH, 2020, 147 (03) : 971 - 990
  • [30] Housing and land financialization under the state ownership of land in China
    Chen, Jie
    Wu, Fulong
    LAND USE POLICY, 2022, 112