Informal government preferences and asymmetric land allocation in China

被引:15
作者
Wu, Shuping [1 ]
Yang, Zan [2 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Jiaotong Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing 100044, Peoples R China
[2] Tsinghua Univ, Dept Construct Management, Tsinghua Hang Lung Ctr Real Estate, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
基金
中国博士后科学基金; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Land allocation; Government preference; Political connection; China; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; POLICY; COMMODIFICATION; PROCUREMENT; CORRUPTION; FINANCE; FIRMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105085
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Whether governments have informal preferences toward firms when allocating land resources and the effects of such preferences on regional development remain unclear, particularly in countries with weak formal institutions. This paper investigates the government's informal preferences in land allocations in China. Substantial evidence is found that politically connected firms are preferred to win land auctions at lower prices due to two different reasons. These preferences are informally achieved through a two-stage auction mechanism rather than formal bid preference programs, and result in the asymmetrical allocation of urban land in terms of land quality, quantity, and price, across politically and non-politically connected firms in China. The state-owned enterprises are allocated poor quality land parcels at 55% land price discounts. In comparison, the manager-based politically connected firms are allocated regular land parcels at 6% price discounts, and other firms without connections with the government are allocated regular land at higher prices.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   Law, finance, and economic growth in China [J].
Allen, F ;
Qian, J ;
Qian, MJ .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2005, 77 (01) :57-116
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2017, CHINA LAND RESOURCES
[3]   Set-Asides and Subsidies in Auctions [J].
Athey, Susan ;
Coey, Dominic ;
Levin, Jonathan .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC JOURNAL-MICROECONOMICS, 2013, 5 (01) :1-27
[4]  
Bai C.E., 2019, DOCUMENTO TRABAJO 25, DOI [10.3386/w25839., DOI 10.3386/W25839]
[5]   The multitask theory of state enterprise reform: Empirical evidence from China [J].
Bai, Chong-En ;
Lu, Jiangyong ;
Tao, Zhigang .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2006, 96 (02) :353-357
[6]   Mergers, cartels, set-asides, and bidding preferences in asymmetric oral auctions [J].
Brannman, L ;
Froeb, LM .
REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 2000, 82 (02) :283-290
[7]   China's land market auctions: evidence of corruption? [J].
Cai, Hongbin ;
Henderson, J. Vernon ;
Zhang, Qinghua .
RAND JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2013, 44 (03) :488-521
[8]   Eat, Drink, Firms, Government: An Investigation of Corruption from the Entertainment and Travel Costs of Chinese Firms [J].
Cai, Hongbin ;
Fang, Hanming ;
Xu, Lixin Colin .
JOURNAL OF LAW & ECONOMICS, 2011, 54 (01) :55-78
[9]   BUSTING THE "PRINCELINGS": THE CAMPAIGN AGAINST CORRUPTION IN CHINA'S PRIMARY LAND MARKET [J].
Chen, Ting ;
Kung, James Kai-Sing .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2019, 134 (01) :185-226
[10]   Auction versus Negotiated Sale: Evidence from Real Estate Sales [J].
Chow, Yuen Leng ;
Hafalir, Isa E. ;
Yavas, Abdullah .
REAL ESTATE ECONOMICS, 2015, 43 (02) :432-470