FDG-PET might not contribute to improving survival in patients with locally advanced inoperable esophageal cancer

被引:7
|
作者
Jingu, Keiichi [1 ]
Umezawa, Rei [1 ]
Yamamoto, Takaya [1 ]
Takeda, Kazuya [1 ]
Ishikawa, Yojiro [1 ]
Takahashi, Noriyoshi [1 ]
Kadoya, Noriyuki [1 ]
Matsushita, Haruo [1 ]
机构
[1] Tohoku Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, Aoba Ku, 1-1 Seiryo Chou, Sendai, Miyagi 9808574, Japan
关键词
Locally advanced esophageal cancer; Chemoradiotherapy; FDG-PET; Prognosis; POSITRON-EMISSION-TOMOGRAPHY; CHEMORADIOTHERAPY;
D O I
10.1007/s10147-019-01428-8
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background In Japan, positron emission tomography using F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG-PET) has been covered by the national health insurance for esophageal cancer since 2006. FDG-PET is commonly performed in advanced esophageal cancer. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of FDG-PET on survival in patients with locally advanced inoperable esophageal cancer. Methods We retrospectively reviewed all patients with cT4 and without M1 esophageal cancer on CT in our institution between 2000 and 2014, and data for 78 patients who meet the eligibility criteria described below were used for analysis in this study. The eligibility criteria included (1) cT4 esophageal cancer without distant metastases or M1 lymph node metastasis (UICC 2002), (2) histologically proven squamous cell carcinoma, (3) 20-79years of age, (4) having undergone at least 1 cycle of concomitant chemotherapy, (5) having been irradiated with 50Gy or more, and (6) no other active malignant tumor during treatment. Results Two patients were excluded because abdominal lymph node metastases or neck lymph node metastases were detected by FDG-PET. In 78 eligible patients, FDG-PET was not performed before treatment in 41 of the 78 patients and was performed in the other patients. The median observation period was 68months. The 3-year and 5-year overall survival rates in 78 patients were 36.9% and 30.8%, respectively. There was no significant difference in overall survival or progression-free survival between patients in whom FDG-PET was performed and those in whom FDG-PET was not performed (12.0months vs. 11.0 months, p=0.920 and 6.0months vs. 6.0 months, p=0.844, respectively). Conclusions Compared with only CT, additional information from FDG-PET is not associated with improving survival in patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer. Our results suggest that FDG-PET might not have much meaning for survival in locally advanced esophageal cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:927 / 933
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Prognostic values of mid-radiotherapy 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with esophageal cancer
    Kim, Nalee
    Cho, Hojin
    Yun, Mijin
    Park, Kyung Ran
    Lee, Chang Geol
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2019, 14
  • [32] Chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced cervix cancer without aortic lymph node involvement: can we consider metabolic parameters of pretherapeutic FDG-PET/CT for treatment tailoring?
    Voglimacci, Marie
    Gabiache, Erwan
    Lusque, Amelie
    Ferron, Gwenael
    Ducassou, Anne
    Querleu, Denis
    Motton, Stephanie
    Chantalat, Elodie
    Courbon, Frederic
    Martinez, Alejandra
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2019, 46 (07) : 1551 - 1559
  • [33] Feasibility of FDG-PET/CT imaging during concurrent chemo-radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer
    Bjerregaard, Jon K.
    Fischer, Barbara M.
    Vilstrup, Mie H.
    Petersen, Henrik
    Mortensen, Michael B.
    Hansen, Christian R.
    Asmussen, Jon T.
    Pfeiffer, Per
    Hoilund-Carlsen, Poul F.
    ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2011, 50 (08) : 1250 - 1252
  • [34] Prognostic Significance of Volume-Based FDG PET/CT Parameters in Patients with Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer Treated with Chemoradiation Therapy
    Choi, Hye Jin
    Lee, Jeong Won
    Kang, Beodeul
    Song, Si Young
    Lee, Jong Doo
    Lee, Jae-Hoon
    YONSEI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2014, 55 (06) : 1498 - 1506
  • [35] Prediction of neoadjuvant radiation chemotherapy response and survival using pretreatment [18F]FDG PET/CT scans in locally advanced rectal cancer
    Bang, Ji-In
    Ha, Seunggyun
    Kang, Sung-Bum
    Lee, Keun-Wook
    Lee, Hye-Seung
    Kim, Jae-Sung
    Oh, Heung-Kwon
    Lee, Ho-Young
    Kim, Sang Eun
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2016, 43 (03) : 422 - 431
  • [36] Predictive value of 18F-FDG PET/CT on survival in locally advanced rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation
    Asabella, A. Niccoli
    Mone, M. S.
    Ballini, A.
    Altini, C.
    Ferrari, C.
    Lavell, V
    De Luca, R.
    Inchingolo, F.
    Rubin, G.
    EUROPEAN REVIEW FOR MEDICAL AND PHARMACOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2018, 22 (23) : 8227 - 8236
  • [37] Predictive Value of Initial PET-SUVmax in Patients with Locally Advanced Esophageal and Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma
    Rizk, Nabil P.
    Tang, Laura
    Adusumilli, Prasad S.
    Bains, Manjit S.
    Akhurst, Timothy J.
    Ilson, David
    Goodman, Karyn
    Rusch, Valerie W.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2009, 4 (07) : 875 - 879
  • [38] The Impact of FDG-PET for the Preoperative Management of Patients with Colorectal Cancer
    Kilbas, Zafer
    Yigit, Taner
    Ilgan, Seyfettin
    Arslan, Nuri
    Mentes, Oner
    Oner, Koksal
    Kozak, Orhan
    Tufan, Turgut
    BALKAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2011, 28 (02) : 133 - 137
  • [39] Role of surgical resection in complete responders on FDG-PET after chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
    Jeong, Yuri
    Kim, Jong Hoon
    Kim, Sung-Bae
    Yoon, Dok Hyun
    Park, Seung Il
    Kim, Yong Hee
    Kim, Hyeong Ryul
    Jung, Hwoon Yong
    Lee, Gin Hyug
    Ryu, Jin-Sook
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 109 (05) : 472 - 477
  • [40] Prognostic value of 18FDG PET/CT volumetric parameters in the survival prediction of patients with pancreatic cancer
    Mohamed, Eyas
    Needham, Alexander
    Psarelli, Eftychia
    Carroll, Melvyn
    Vinjamuri, Sobhan
    Sanghera, Bal
    Wong, Wai Lup
    Halloran, Christopher
    Ghaneh, Paula
    EJSO, 2020, 46 (08): : 1532 - 1538