FDG-PET might not contribute to improving survival in patients with locally advanced inoperable esophageal cancer

被引:7
|
作者
Jingu, Keiichi [1 ]
Umezawa, Rei [1 ]
Yamamoto, Takaya [1 ]
Takeda, Kazuya [1 ]
Ishikawa, Yojiro [1 ]
Takahashi, Noriyoshi [1 ]
Kadoya, Noriyuki [1 ]
Matsushita, Haruo [1 ]
机构
[1] Tohoku Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, Aoba Ku, 1-1 Seiryo Chou, Sendai, Miyagi 9808574, Japan
关键词
Locally advanced esophageal cancer; Chemoradiotherapy; FDG-PET; Prognosis; POSITRON-EMISSION-TOMOGRAPHY; CHEMORADIOTHERAPY;
D O I
10.1007/s10147-019-01428-8
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background In Japan, positron emission tomography using F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG-PET) has been covered by the national health insurance for esophageal cancer since 2006. FDG-PET is commonly performed in advanced esophageal cancer. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of FDG-PET on survival in patients with locally advanced inoperable esophageal cancer. Methods We retrospectively reviewed all patients with cT4 and without M1 esophageal cancer on CT in our institution between 2000 and 2014, and data for 78 patients who meet the eligibility criteria described below were used for analysis in this study. The eligibility criteria included (1) cT4 esophageal cancer without distant metastases or M1 lymph node metastasis (UICC 2002), (2) histologically proven squamous cell carcinoma, (3) 20-79years of age, (4) having undergone at least 1 cycle of concomitant chemotherapy, (5) having been irradiated with 50Gy or more, and (6) no other active malignant tumor during treatment. Results Two patients were excluded because abdominal lymph node metastases or neck lymph node metastases were detected by FDG-PET. In 78 eligible patients, FDG-PET was not performed before treatment in 41 of the 78 patients and was performed in the other patients. The median observation period was 68months. The 3-year and 5-year overall survival rates in 78 patients were 36.9% and 30.8%, respectively. There was no significant difference in overall survival or progression-free survival between patients in whom FDG-PET was performed and those in whom FDG-PET was not performed (12.0months vs. 11.0 months, p=0.920 and 6.0months vs. 6.0 months, p=0.844, respectively). Conclusions Compared with only CT, additional information from FDG-PET is not associated with improving survival in patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer. Our results suggest that FDG-PET might not have much meaning for survival in locally advanced esophageal cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:927 / 933
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] FDG-PET/CT Might Be a Predictor for Residual Disease in Advanced NSCLC after Chemoradiotherapy
    Sawada, Toru
    Kondo, Kazuya
    Tsuboi, Mitsuhiro
    Kawakita, Naoya
    Kajiura, Koichiro
    Toba, Hiroaki
    Kawakami, Yukikiyo
    Yoshida, Mitsuteru
    Takizawa, Hiromitsu
    Tangoku, Akira
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2017, 12 (01) : S560 - S560
  • [22] The utility of FDG-PET in the preoperative staging of esophageal cancer
    Gananadha, S.
    Hazebroek, E. J.
    Leibman, S.
    Berry, H.
    Osgood, L.
    Shon, I. Ho
    Pavlakis, N.
    Marx, G.
    Smith, G. S.
    DISEASES OF THE ESOPHAGUS, 2008, 21 (05) : 389 - 394
  • [23] Neoadjuvant chemoradiation for esophageal cancer Surgery improves locoregional control while response based on FDG-PET/CT predicts survival
    Hegemann, Nina-Sophie
    Koepple, Rebecca
    Walter, Franziska
    Boeckle, David
    Fendler, Wolfgang P.
    Angele, Martin Kurt
    Boeck, Stefan
    Belka, Claus
    Roeder, Falk
    STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2018, 194 (05) : 435 - 443
  • [24] FDG-PET-based prognostic nomograms for locally advanced cervical cancer
    Kidd, Elizabeth A.
    El Naqa, Issam
    Siegel, Barry A.
    Dehdashti, Farrokh
    Grigsby, Perry W.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2012, 127 (01) : 136 - 140
  • [25] Total Lesion Glycolysis Using 18F-FDG PET/CT as a Prognostic Factor for Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer
    Hong, Ji Hyung
    Kim, Hyon Ho
    Han, Eun Ji
    Byun, Jae Ho
    Jang, Hong Seok
    Choi, Eun Kyoung
    Kang, Jin Hyoung
    Yoo, Ie Ryung
    JOURNAL OF KOREAN MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2016, 31 (01) : 39 - 46
  • [26] Accuracy of PET-CT in Predicting Survival in Patients with Esophageal Cancer
    Brown, Claire
    Howes, Ben
    Jamieson, Glyn G.
    Bartholomeusz, Dylan
    Zingg, Urs
    Sullivan, Thomas R.
    Thompson, Sarah K.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2012, 36 (05) : 1089 - 1095
  • [27] Utility of FDG-PET/CT in the Evaluation of the Response of Locally Advanced Breast Cancer to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
    Ogino, Kei
    Nakajima, Masanobu
    Kakuta, Miyako
    Hayashi, Mitsuhiro
    Yamaguchi, Satoru
    Tsuchioka, Takashi
    Kubota, Keiichi
    Sakamoto, Setsu
    Kato, Hiroyuki
    INTERNATIONAL SURGERY, 2014, 99 (04) : 309 - 318
  • [28] FDG-PET/CT in the Radiotherapy Treatment Planning of Locally Advanced Anal Cancer: A Monoinstitutional Experience
    Di Carlo, Clelia
    di Benedetto, Maika
    Vicenzi, Lisa
    Costantini, Sara
    Cucciarelli, Francesca
    Fenu, Francesco
    Arena, Eleonora
    Mariucci, Cristina
    Montisci, Maria
    Panni, Valeria
    Patani, Fabiola
    Valenti, Marco
    Palucci, Andrea
    Burroni, Luca
    Mantello, Giovanna
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2021, 11
  • [29] Systematic Review of FDG-PET Prediction of Complete Pathological Response and Survival in Rectal Cancer
    Memon, Sameer
    Lynch, A. Craig
    Akhurst, Timothy
    Ngan, Samuel Y.
    Warrier, Satish K.
    Michael, Michael
    Heriot, Alexander G.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 21 (11) : 3598 - 3607
  • [30] Metabolic activity by FDG-PET/CT after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic cancer and association with survival
    Lee, Woohyung
    Oh, Minyoung
    Kim, Jae Seung
    Park, Yejong
    Kwon, Jae Woo
    Jun, Eunsung
    Song, Ki Byung
    Lee, Jae Hoon
    Hwang, Dae Wook
    Yoo, Changhoon
    Kim, Kyu-Pyo
    Jeong, Jae Ho
    Chang, Heung-Moon
    Ryoo, Baek-Yeol
    Park, Seo Young
    Kim, Song Cheol
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2022, 109 (01) : 61 - 70