Two commercial extenders for cryopreservation of epididymal bull sperm

被引:4
作者
Formighieri Bertol, Melina Andrea [1 ]
Weiss, Romildo Romualdo [1 ]
Fujita, Aline Silva [2 ]
Kozicki, Luiz Ernandes [2 ]
Machinski Rangel de Abreu, Ana Claudia [3 ]
Scheffer Pereira, Joao Filipi [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Parana, Area Concentracao Saude Anim & Humana, Programa Posgrad Engn Bioproc & Biotecnol, BR-80035050 Curitiba, PR, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Parana, Dept Vet Med, BR-80035050 Curitiba, PR, Brazil
[3] Pontificia Univ Catolica Parana, Ctr Ciencias Agr & Ambientais, Curitiba, PR, Brazil
来源
CIENCIA RURAL | 2014年 / 44卷 / 09期
关键词
extender; sperm viability; epididymis; computer assisted sperm analysis (CASA); BOVINE SEMEN; SPERMATOZOA; QUALITY; STORAGE;
D O I
10.1590/0103-8478cr20130747
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Recovery and cryopreservation of epididymal sperm is a viable alternative for preservation of genetically valuable animals. The aim of this study was to veriry, and to compare the effect of two commercial extenders for conventional semen on post-thawing viability of bovine epididymal sperm. For this purpose, the spermatozoa was recovered from the tail of 20 epididymis of Tabapua bulls (Bos Taurus indicus) using retrograde flow method. After sperm recovery, the cells were centrifuged and divided for dilution with the diluents Botu-Bov (R) (BB) or Bovimix (R) (BY) for cryopreservation at -196 degrees C. After thawing, all samples were evaluated using computer assisted sperm analysis (CASA), and by microscopic analysis for determination of integrity of plasma and acrossomal membrane and morphology Statistical evaluation was pet:formed by analysis of variance (ANOVA) with post-test for multiple comparisons, the Tukey-Kramer test, with significance level (P<0.05). The results of the sperm movement for diluent BB and BV evaluated with CASA, showed no difference for both (P>0.05). There was also no difference between the percentage of deformed sperm, acrosome defects and the sperm with intact plasma membrane after thawing with BB or BV We conclude that both extenders (RB and BV) are efficient and can be used for freezing sperm collected from the epididymis of bulls, showing no difference for all the parameters studied
引用
收藏
页码:1658 / 1663
页数:6
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
Arruda R. L., 2010, Revista Brasileira de Reproducao Animal, V34, P168
[2]  
BERTOL M.A.F., 2012, THESIS U FEDERAL PAR, P76
[3]  
BLOM E, 1973, NORD VET MED, V25, P383
[4]  
CBRA, 1998, MAN EX ANDR AV SEM A
[5]   Improvement of parameters of freezing medium and freezing protocol for bull sperm using two osmotic supports [J].
Chaveiro, A. ;
Machado, L. ;
Frijters, A. ;
Engel, B. ;
Woelders, H. .
THERIOGENOLOGY, 2006, 65 (09) :1875-1890
[6]  
Costa PD, 2011, CIENC RURAL, V41, P869, DOI 10.1590/S0103-84782011005000045
[7]  
CRESPILHO A.M., 2007, THESIS U ESTADUAL PA, P124
[8]   Evaluation of epididymal semen quality using the Hamilton-Thorne analyser indicates variation between the two caudae epididymides of the same bull [J].
Goovaerts, I. G. F. ;
Hoflack, G. G. ;
Van Soom, A. ;
Dewulf, J. ;
Nichi, A. ;
de Kruif, A. ;
Bols, P. E. J. .
THERIOGENOLOGY, 2006, 66 (02) :323-330
[9]  
HARRISON RAP, 1990, J REPROD FERTIL, V88, P343, DOI 10.1530/jrf.0.0880343
[10]   Sperm survival versus degradation in the mammalian epididymis: A hypothesis [J].
Jones, R .
BIOLOGY OF REPRODUCTION, 2004, 71 (05) :1405-1411