A method using two dimensions of the patent classification for measuring the technological proximity: an application in identifying a potential R&D partner in biotechnology

被引:19
作者
Angue, Katia [1 ]
Ayerbe, Cecile [2 ]
Mitkova, Liliana [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Reunion, CEMOI, F-97715 St Denis 9, Reunion, France
[2] Univ Nice Sophia Antipolis, GREDEG, F-06560 Valbonne, France
[3] Univ Paris Est, IRG, 2 Rue Albert Einstein, F-77420 Champs Sur Marne, France
关键词
Patents; Strategy; Cooperation; Technological proximity; Choice of partner; International Patent Classification (IPC); OPEN INNOVATION; PHARMACEUTICAL-INDUSTRY; KNOWLEDGE SPILLOVERS; ABSORPTIVE-CAPACITY; LOCAL SEARCH; HIGH-TECH; FIRMS; PERFORMANCE; MARKET; ALLIANCES;
D O I
10.1007/s10961-013-9325-8
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
This paper aims to show how the information contained in patent documents can be used to identify basic and specific technological proximities between firms and therefore a potential research and development (R&D) partner. More generally, it looks at patents as a strategic tool that can be used for concluding cooperative R&D agreements (CRDA). The approach begins by looking at the state of the art on the role of technological proximity in CRDAs. This review clearly raises the problem of measuring technological proximity, which needs to be gauged at a two-fold level: general and specific. Then a dual method based on patent portfolios for analyzing the profiles of different potential partners is described along with an example of its application. Concretely, the exploratory study proposed here is based on an analysis of the patent portfolios of 14 French listed biotechnology companies and those of their main R&D partners. The analysis of 5,603 patents filed by the focal firms and their partners shows how the approach can be used to identify compatible partners that are more or less technologically matched.
引用
收藏
页码:716 / 747
页数:32
相关论文
共 73 条
[1]   Technological acquisitions and the innovation performance of acquiring firms: A longitudinal study [J].
Ahuja, G ;
Katila, R .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2001, 22 (03) :197-220
[2]   Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study [J].
Ahuja, G .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 2000, 45 (03) :425-455
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2004, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, DOI DOI 10.1080/1043859042000234302
[4]   What percentage of innovations are patented? empirical estimates for European firms [J].
Arundel, A ;
Kabla, I .
RESEARCH POLICY, 1998, 27 (02) :127-141
[5]  
Babry B., 2006, WORLD PATENT INFORM, V28, P215
[6]   A measure of technological distance [J].
Bar, Talia ;
Leiponen, Aija .
ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2012, 116 (03) :457-459
[7]   Coopetition in business networks - to cooperate and compete simultaneously [J].
Bengtsson, M ;
Kock, S .
INDUSTRIAL MARKETING MANAGEMENT, 2000, 29 (05) :411-426
[8]   Close to you? Bias and precision in patent-based measures of technological proximity [J].
Benner, Mary ;
Waldfogel, Joel .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2008, 37 (09) :1556-1567
[9]   Organisational modes for Open Innovation in the bio-pharmaceutical industry: An exploratory analysis [J].
Bianchi, Mattia ;
Cavaliere, Alberto ;
Chiaroni, Davide ;
Frattini, Federico ;
Chiesa, Vittorio .
TECHNOVATION, 2011, 31 (01) :22-33
[10]   Motives to patent: Empirical evidence from Germany [J].
Blind, K ;
Edler, J ;
Frietsch, R ;
Schmoch, U .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2006, 35 (05) :655-672