Endoprosthetic replacement of the proximal tibia for oncological conditions

被引:5
|
作者
Sacchetti, F. [1 ]
Aston, W. [1 ]
Pollock, R. [1 ]
Gikas, P. [1 ]
Cuomo, P. [1 ]
Gerrand, C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Royal Natl Orthopaed Hosp, London, England
来源
BONE & JOINT OPEN | 2022年 / 3卷 / 09期
关键词
Bone tumour; Proximal tibia; Megaprosthesis; Extensor mechanism; Orthopaedic oncology; ALLOGRAFT-PROSTHETIC COMPOSITE; LIMB-SPARING SURGERY; EXTENSOR MECHANISM; BONE-TUMOR; OSTEOARTICULAR ALLOGRAFTS; MALIGNANT-TUMORS; RECONSTRUCTION; KNEE; RESECTION; INFECTION;
D O I
10.1302/2633-1462.39.BJO-2022-0069.R1
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Aims The proximal tibia (PT) is the anatomical site most frequently affected by primary bone tumours after the distal femur. Reconstruction of the PT remains challenging because of the poor soft-tissue cover and the need to reconstruct the extensor mechanism. Reconstructive techniques include implantation of massive endoprosthesis ( megaprosthesis), osteoarticular allografts (OAs), or allograft-prosthesis composites (APCs). Methods This was a retrospective analysis of clinical data relating to patients who underwent proximal tibial arthroplasty in our regional bone tumour centre from 2010 to 2018. Results A total of 76 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were included in the study. Mean age at surgery was 43.2 years (12 to 86 (SD 21)). The mean follow-up period was 60.1 months (5.4 to 353). In total 21 failures were identified, giving an overall failure rate of 27.6%. Prosthesis survival at five years was 75.5%, and at ten years was 59%. At last follow-up, mean knee flexion was 89.8 degrees (SD 36 degrees) with a mean extensor lag of 18.1 degrees (SD 24 degrees). In univariate analysis, factors associated with better survival of the prosthesis were a malignant or metastatic cancer diagnosis (versus benign), with a five- and ten-year survival of 78.9% and 65.7% versus 37.5% (p = 0.045), while in-hospital length of stay longer than nine days was also associated with better prognosis with five- and ten-year survival rates at 84% and 84% versus 60% and 16% (p < 0.001). In multi-variate analysis, only in-hospital length of stay was associated with longer survival (hazard ratio (HR) 0.23, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.08 to 0.66). Conclusion We have shown that proximal tibial arthroplasty with endoprosthesis is a safe and reliable method for reconstruction in patients treated for orthopaedic oncological conditions. Either modular or custom implants in this series performed well.
引用
收藏
页码:733 / 740
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Silver-coated endoprosthetic replacement of the proximal humerus in case of tumour—is there an increased risk of periprosthetic infection by using a trevira tube?
    Jan Schmolders
    Sebastian Koob
    Paul Schepers
    Michael Kehrer
    Sönke Percy Frey
    Dieter Christian Wirtz
    Peter Heinrich Pennekamp
    Andreas Christian Strauss
    International Orthopaedics, 2017, 41 : 423 - 428
  • [42] Endoprosthetic reconstruction of the proximal humerus in malignoma
    Streitbuerger, A.
    Henrichs, M.
    Hardes, J.
    Dieckmann, R.
    Hoell, S.
    Gosheger, G.
    OPERATIVE ORTHOPADIE UND TRAUMATOLOGIE, 2012, 24 (03): : 174 - 185
  • [43] Proximal Tibia Osteoarticular Allografts in Tumor Limb Salvage Surgery
    Luis Muscolo, D.
    Ayerza, Miguel A.
    Farfalli, German
    Aponte-Tinao, Luis A.
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2010, 468 (05) : 1396 - 1404
  • [44] Internal fixation versus endoprosthetic replacement of the proximal femur for metastatic bone disease: Single institutional outcomes
    Gusho, Charles A.
    Clayton, Bishir
    Mehta, Nabil
    Hmeidan, Wassim
    Colman, Matthew W.
    Gitelis, Steven
    Blank, Alan T.
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS, 2021, 28 : 86 - 90
  • [45] Use of irradiated autologous bone in joint sparing endoprosthetic femoral replacement tumor surgery
    Vijayan, Sridhar
    Bartlett, William
    Lee, Robert
    Ostler, Peter
    Blunn, Gordon W.
    Cannon, Stephen R.
    Briggs, Timothy W. R.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS, 2011, 45 (02) : 161 - 167
  • [46] Endoprosthetic replacement following intercalary resection
    Goebel, L.
    Kohn, D.
    Orth, P.
    ORTHOPADE, 2019, 48 (07): : 572 - 581
  • [47] Poor prognosis and complications are common in limb salvage surgery for malignant tumors of the proximal tibia invading the fibula
    Tang, Xiaodong
    Guo, Wei
    Yang, Rongli
    Wang, Yifei
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2014, 134 (03) : 299 - 304
  • [48] SOFT-TISSUE MANAGEMENT WITH IMMEDIATE FREE FLAP TRANSFER IN SEGMENTAL PROSTHETIC REPLACEMENT OF PROXIMAL TIBIA SARCOMAS
    Sonmez, Erhan
    Kamburoglu, Haldun Onuralp
    Aksu, Ali Emre
    Nasir, Serdar Nazif
    Evrenos, Mustafa Kursat
    Safak, Tunc
    Kecik, Abdullah
    MICROSURGERY, 2011, 31 (08) : 620 - 627
  • [49] Endoprosthetic replacement of distal femoral tumors in Nigeria: A case series
    Idowu, O. K.
    Eyesan, S. U.
    Badmus, H. D.
    Giwa, S. O.
    Badmos, K. B.
    Abdulkareem, F. B.
    NIGERIAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2016, 19 (04) : 567 - 572
  • [50] Extensor Function After Medial Gastrocnemius Flap Reconstruction of the Proximal Tibia
    Jentzsch, Thorsten
    Erschbamer, Matthias
    Seeli, Franziska
    Fuchs, Bruno
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2013, 471 (07) : 2333 - 2339