Endoprosthetic replacement of the proximal tibia for oncological conditions

被引:5
|
作者
Sacchetti, F. [1 ]
Aston, W. [1 ]
Pollock, R. [1 ]
Gikas, P. [1 ]
Cuomo, P. [1 ]
Gerrand, C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Royal Natl Orthopaed Hosp, London, England
来源
BONE & JOINT OPEN | 2022年 / 3卷 / 09期
关键词
Bone tumour; Proximal tibia; Megaprosthesis; Extensor mechanism; Orthopaedic oncology; ALLOGRAFT-PROSTHETIC COMPOSITE; LIMB-SPARING SURGERY; EXTENSOR MECHANISM; BONE-TUMOR; OSTEOARTICULAR ALLOGRAFTS; MALIGNANT-TUMORS; RECONSTRUCTION; KNEE; RESECTION; INFECTION;
D O I
10.1302/2633-1462.39.BJO-2022-0069.R1
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Aims The proximal tibia (PT) is the anatomical site most frequently affected by primary bone tumours after the distal femur. Reconstruction of the PT remains challenging because of the poor soft-tissue cover and the need to reconstruct the extensor mechanism. Reconstructive techniques include implantation of massive endoprosthesis ( megaprosthesis), osteoarticular allografts (OAs), or allograft-prosthesis composites (APCs). Methods This was a retrospective analysis of clinical data relating to patients who underwent proximal tibial arthroplasty in our regional bone tumour centre from 2010 to 2018. Results A total of 76 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were included in the study. Mean age at surgery was 43.2 years (12 to 86 (SD 21)). The mean follow-up period was 60.1 months (5.4 to 353). In total 21 failures were identified, giving an overall failure rate of 27.6%. Prosthesis survival at five years was 75.5%, and at ten years was 59%. At last follow-up, mean knee flexion was 89.8 degrees (SD 36 degrees) with a mean extensor lag of 18.1 degrees (SD 24 degrees). In univariate analysis, factors associated with better survival of the prosthesis were a malignant or metastatic cancer diagnosis (versus benign), with a five- and ten-year survival of 78.9% and 65.7% versus 37.5% (p = 0.045), while in-hospital length of stay longer than nine days was also associated with better prognosis with five- and ten-year survival rates at 84% and 84% versus 60% and 16% (p < 0.001). In multi-variate analysis, only in-hospital length of stay was associated with longer survival (hazard ratio (HR) 0.23, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.08 to 0.66). Conclusion We have shown that proximal tibial arthroplasty with endoprosthesis is a safe and reliable method for reconstruction in patients treated for orthopaedic oncological conditions. Either modular or custom implants in this series performed well.
引用
收藏
页码:733 / 740
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Mid- to long-term results of allograft-prosthesis composite reconstruction after removal of a distal femoral malignant tumor are comparable to those of the proximal tibia
    Puerta-GarciaSandoval, Pablo
    Lizaur-Utrilla, Alejandro
    Trigueros-Rentero, Maria A.
    Lopez-Prats, Fernando A.
    KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2019, 27 (07) : 2218 - 2225
  • [32] Endoprosthetic proximal femur replacement to transfemoral amputee as a practical treatment option: A case report
    Tsuda, Yusuke
    Okuma, Tomotake
    Imanishi, Jungo
    Hozumi, Takahiro
    Goto, Takahiro
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SCIENCE, 2021, 26 (02) : 315 - 318
  • [33] Replacement of the proximal humerus with MUTARS tumor endoprostheses
    Raiss, P.
    Kinkel, S.
    Sauter, U.
    Bruckner, T.
    Lehner, B.
    EJSO, 2010, 36 (04): : 371 - 377
  • [34] The Use of Proximal Femur Replacement for the Management of Oncologic Lesions in the Proximal Femur A Review
    Tobey, Devon
    Wing, Clayton
    Calkins, Tyler
    Heck, Robert K.
    ORTHOPEDIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2023, 54 (01) : 23 - 35
  • [35] Reconstruction of the knee extensor mechanism in patients with a malignant bone tumor of the proximal tibia
    Yukihiro Yoshida
    Shunzo Osaka
    Junnosuke Ryu
    Surgery Today, 2010, 40 : 646 - 649
  • [36] Reconstruction of the knee extensor mechanism in patients with a malignant bone tumor of the proximal tibia
    Yoshida, Yukihiro
    Osaka, Shunzo
    Ryu, Junnosuke
    SURGERY TODAY, 2010, 40 (07) : 646 - 649
  • [37] Proximal Tibia Fractures in Osteoporosis
    Sauhta, Ravi
    Makkar, Dheeraj
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS, 2025, 59 (03) : 326 - 345
  • [38] Predictors of Soft-Tissue Complications and Deep Infection in Allograft Reconstruction of the Proximal Tibia
    Lozano-Calderon, Santiago A.
    Swaim, Sara O.
    Federico, Amy
    Anderson, Megan E.
    Gebhardt, Mark C.
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 113 (07) : 811 - 817
  • [39] Endoprosthetic Reconstruction for Proximal Humerus Tumors
    Su, Favian
    Garcia-Lopez, Edgar
    Wustrack, Rosanna
    Lansdown, Drew A.
    CURRENT REVIEWS IN MUSCULOSKELETAL MEDICINE, 2025, 18 (01) : 26 - 37
  • [40] Tumour endoprosthesis replacement in the proximal tibia after intra-articular knee resection in patients with sarcoma and recurrent giant cell tumour
    Jendrik Hardes
    Marcel-Philipp Henrichs
    Georg Gosheger
    Wiebke Guder
    Markus Nottrott
    Dimosthenis Andreou
    Eike Bormann
    Maria Eveslage
    Gregor Hauschild
    Arne Streitbürger
    International Orthopaedics, 2018, 42 : 2475 - 2481