The mechanisms for detecting compressively sampled gratings

被引:0
作者
Rainville, SJM
Kingdom, FAA
机构
[1] McGill Vision Research Unit, Montréal, Que. H3A 1Al
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会; 英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
sampling; contrast sensitivity; gain control;
D O I
10.1016/S0042-6989(97)00070-9
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Contrast thresholds for sine-wave gratings are raised when the gratings are compressively sampled into a set of narrow bright bars on a dark background, even though this method of sampling preserves the mean luminance and contrast of the grating, Purr et al. [(1985). Vision Research, 25, 717-727] suggested threshold elevation was due to localized luminance adaptation to the sample bars, whose average peak luminance necessarily increased when fewer bars per cycle were present. Previously, we reported results using decrement-bar compressively sampled gratings (CSGs), which consist of dark sample bars on a bright background, which favoured the local luminance adaptation hypothesis (Kingdom & Rainville, 1995), Here we report experiments that suggest that this hypothesis is untenable, Using increment-bar CSGs (bright sample bars on a dark background) we found that raising background luminance while holding sample bar luminance constant reduced thresholds by as much as a factor of ten, This suggests that it is the contrast of the bars, rather than their luminance, which determines thresholds, Further experiments showed that CSG detection was facilitated by unsampled grating pedestals, and thresholds were elevated when the fundamental was physically cancelled, This implied that CSGs were detected by the same mechanisms as the unsampled gratings from which they are derived, Finally, we provide evidence for the involvement of a dynamic gain control component for increment-bar CSG detection. (C) 1997 Elsevier Science Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:3237 / 3254
页数:18
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   INCREMENT THRESHOLDS AT LOW INTENSITIES CONSIDERED AS SIGNAL-NOISE DISCRIMINATIONS [J].
BARLOW, HB .
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 1957, 136 (03) :469-488
[2]   A 2-PROCESS ANALYSIS OF PATTERN MASKING [J].
BOWEN, RW ;
WILSON, HR .
VISION RESEARCH, 1994, 34 (05) :645-657
[3]   A COMPARISON OF CONTRAST DETECTION AND DISCRIMINATION [J].
BRADLEY, A ;
OHZAWA, I .
VISION RESEARCH, 1986, 26 (06) :991-997
[4]   LOCAL-REGULATION OF LUMINANCE GAIN [J].
BURR, DC ;
ROSS, J ;
MORRONE, MC .
VISION RESEARCH, 1985, 25 (05) :717-+
[5]   ORIENTATIONAL SELECTIVITY OF HUMAN VISUAL SYSTEM [J].
CAMPBELL, FW ;
KULIKOWSKI, JJ .
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 1966, 187 (02) :437-+
[6]   THE SPREAD OF ADAPTATION IN HUMAN FOVEAL AND PARAFOVEAL CONE VISION [J].
CICERONE, CM ;
HAYHOE, MM ;
MACLEOD, DIA .
VISION RESEARCH, 1990, 30 (11) :1603-1615
[7]  
CLELAND BG, 1988, J PHYSL, V404, P592
[8]   VISUAL ADAPTATION IN RELATION TO BRIEF CONDITIONING STIMULI [J].
CRAWFORD, BH .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY SERIES B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1947, 134 (875) :283-302
[9]   DETECTION OF SPATIAL BEATS - NONLINEARITY OR CONTRAST INCREMENT DETECTION [J].
DERRINGTON, AM ;
BADCOCK, DR .
VISION RESEARCH, 1986, 26 (02) :343-&
[10]  
FINKELSTEIN MA, 1981, VISION RES, V21, P271